Jump to content

Ex-mayor’s sentence for pant-stripping assault commuted


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

Ex-mayor’s sentence for pant-stripping assault commuted

By The Nation

 

800_6b351615a5cd295.jpg

Former Ban Phai mayor Premsak Piayura

 

The Supreme Court on Wednesday commuted the jail sentence of a veteran Khon Kaen politician found guilty of indecent assaulting a journalist to two months in detention.

 

Former Ban Phai mayor Premsak Piayura and his aide Buathong Lokan locked several reporters in his office in July 2016, berated them for staining his honour and stripped one to his underpants.

 

The attack came after the Daily News reporter questioned Premsak, then 51, over rumours and evidence he was engaged to a schoolgirl and had paid the bride price of a car and Bt400,000.

 

The court commuted Premsak and his aide’s sentence on grounds that this was their first criminal offence and they had agreed to pay compensation of Bt100,000.

 

Media representative Pramote Sribura said Wednesday's decision was satisfactory, though he had expected stronger punishment for the attack.

 

Premsak’s Bt100,000 compensation offer was refused by reporters, who said they would not be bought off and should not be harassed for doing their journalistic duties.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30394255

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-09-09
 
  • Sad 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites


14 hours ago, sammieuk1 said:

Sounds like a Tory party to me remove his whip and flog him with it he sounds like a right bleeding pervert ????

 

More like a Keith Vaz party! 

 

Read about his little parties and how he avoided a police inquiry over his unusual wealth; lied to Parliament and went into a mental health hospital. Now back as the Chair of his former constituency's Labour Party!

 

Politicians seem to enjoy immunity from the laws we mere plebs are ruled by. In every country,

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

berated them for staining his honour

Yeah, right. What honor?

 

BTW: Did he, or did he not, "engage" to a (underage) schoolgirl as alleged? Does anyone know? Because if so, he had already stained his oh so precious honor at that very moment and no outside "staining assistance" was needed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Misterwhisper said:

Yeah, right. What honor?

 

BTW: Did he, or did he not, "engage" to a (underage) schoolgirl as alleged? Does anyone know? Because if so, he had already stained his oh so precious honor at that very moment and no outside "staining assistance" was needed.

That was proven earlier.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Misterwhisper said:

Yeah, right. What honor?

 

BTW: Did he, or did he not, "engage" to a (underage) schoolgirl as alleged? Does anyone know? Because if so, he had already stained his oh so precious honor at that very moment and no outside "staining assistance" was needed.

There were pictures published at the time of him handing over the dowry although he claimed he was just helping them out.

 

premsak.jpg.c3a3d56207e9129a310ea827ca9d0d64.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Misterwhisper said:

Yeah, right. What honor?

 

BTW: Did he, or did he not, "engage" to a (underage) schoolgirl as alleged? Does anyone know? Because if so, he had already stained his oh so precious honor at that very moment and no outside "staining assistance" was needed.

The issue of his "engagement" and "paid bride price" was soundly avoided in the article.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...