Jump to content

As legal blitz flounders, Trump protesters back false election claims


rooster59

Recommended Posts

On 11/15/2020 at 7:13 AM, placeholder said:

But the good thing is they now realize that they've been lied to by their alternative sources and will soon be subscribing to the NY Times and the Washington Post. 


Not a chance, both are behind paywalls. Why pay for journalism when you can lap up drivel for free watching Fox?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RobFord said:


Not a chance, both are behind paywalls. Why pay for journalism when you can lap up drivel for free watching Fox?

You can always look at ABC news Australia, funded by the taxpayer for free. Of course, right wing media tycoons such as Murdoch would prefer it wasn't around, as it interrupts their narrative with fact-checking.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, ExpatOK said:

The really sad thing is 75+ million voted for Biden who clearly exhibits signs of dementia.   I have lost my country and while I can certainly defend Biden, who cannot be held responsible for his actions, I cannot defend those who used him to get the presidency. He should have been put in a home, but his family allowed him to be used and abused by the Democrat machine. Shame on all of those who let this happen.

If you lost your country on the basis of The Donald being fired, for cause, you have not lost anything worth saving. He has documented for all times that he and his ilk are anathema to the hopes and promise that citizens are capable of governing themselves.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fangless said:

W*T-F. Trump's only cause is himself.  He has no morals and he does not know right from wrong!

 

 

 

 

Trump - thanks to his followers -  will come out more bankable when anyone else would have lost all dignity acting the same way - Trump considers he has nothing to lose. 

Edited by Opl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Phoenix Rising said:

A sign was spotted, oh the horror. Anyone could have brought that sign.

Edited by onthedarkside
racist/anti-gay image removed
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Trump supporters brought that sign. 

 

Not necessarily; nut jobs on the left are just as capable as nut jobs on the right to insert agitators to kick <deleted> off.

 

Edited by Salerno
Typo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, olfu said:

Somehow its always loosing side not happy with election results and start trouble. Kinda about time to fix problem in advance.

Please inform us when have situations like this occurred before?

Especially the incumbent refusing to concede thhe result and denying the president (alledged) elect briefings and being contradicted by his own legal persons and the courts denying his claims of fraud?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Nonsense.

American televangelist Pat Robertson, with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order, became the most prominent Christian disseminator of conspiracy theories about recent American history. He describes a scenario where Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging people constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.[6]

It was observed that, throughout the 1990s, the galvanizing language used by conspiracy theorists such as Linda Thompson, Mark Koernke and Robert K. Spear led to militancy and the rise of the militia movement.[19] 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Order_(conspiracy_theory)

Open borders is one of their wants, Does that sound conservatish?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Open borders is one of their wants, Does that sound conservatish?

Open Borders is one of whose wants? You mean the desire of the global conspiracy that Pat Roberts alleges exists? It's crazy right wingers who go on about a New World Order conspiracy. It's not an obsession of the left.

Edited by placeholder
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:
13 minutes ago, impulse said:

It didn't.  But the transition to a Bush presidency didn't start until the court case was decided.  Kind like 2020.

Huge difference. There were 2 potential new administrations back then. Now there's only one.

 

Yeah, like a transition to a Gore presidency would have been a big deal.  All they would have done is move a little furniture.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...