Jump to content

No vaccine, no entry – the next challenge of Covid-19


webfact

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, tribalfusion001 said:

Easyjet and Ryanair said for travel within the EU they won't require a vaccine to board. Boycott those companies and countries that insist on vaccines.

Or even better , use only them who do insist on it .

In fact , as soon as i can fly again , i will certainly keep it in mind who let's every idiot in , or insist on best security .

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sezze said:

Or even better , use only them who do insist on it .

In fact , as soon as i can fly again , i will certainly keep it in mind who let's every idiot in , or insist on best security .

I've been on 7 flights so far this year, 6 of them during the pandemic with no problems at all. UK, Thailand, Malaysia, Thailand, UK, Greece, Germany and the UK. Try North Korea for best security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2020 at 9:40 PM, ThailandRyan said:

And does that mean their own Thai Nationals as well, since currently a pre-flight Covid test is not needed.

This being referred to as the "dirty grandpa clause".....I suggest free soapies upon arrival at swampy!!! ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2020 at 1:58 PM, Jingthing said:

Yes, I'm sure a good portion of those avoiding the vaccine will be persuaded over time assuming that there are no indications of serious safety issues with the many millions getting it during the earlier phases. Of course if there are serious safety issues that are revealed, then that will be a big problem. On the other hand, there are already multiple vaccines that are going forward, so there could be a safety issue with one and that could be dropped without too much damage.

I disagree. All of the vaccines that anti-vaxxers currently won't take have been around for many, many years and have been fully vetted for safety. All that will happen is that anti-vaxxers will troll the conspiracy websites, as they do now, and will find enough nonsense there to suit their confirmation bias.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, brucec64 said:

I disagree. All of the vaccines that anti-vaxxers currently won't take have been around for many, many years and have been fully vetted for safety. All that will happen is that anti-vaxxers will troll the conspiracy websites, as they do now, and will find enough nonsense there to suit their confirmation bias.

 

You didn't understand my comment. 

People that identify as anti vaccers are only a subset of the people that will initially avoid getting vaccinated. Obviously the extremists are off the table.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2020 at 6:42 PM, herfiehandbag said:

I understand that it is only one of a range of vaccines about to become available that needs to be "super cold". The rest just require normal refrigeration.

Of the three I've read about so far only the Oxford (Astro Zeniga) doesn't and it has a much lower success rate. It depends on the regimen though. 60-70% I think. Can't remember for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brucec64 said:

I disagree. All of the vaccines that anti-vaxxers currently won't take have been around for many, many years and have been fully vetted for safety. All that will happen is that anti-vaxxers will troll the conspiracy websites, as they do now, and will find enough nonsense there to suit their confirmation bias.

 

 

Looking back at this five years from now, antivaxxers will be saying that the death rate from Covid19 was going down anyway and that Covid would have gone away naturally even without a vaccine. For extra points, they'll claim that as with polio, the measles, and smallpox, improvements in sanitiry conditions were what really brought the disease under control and that the vaccine had nothing to do with it.

Edited by suzannegoh
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, elgenon said:

Of the three I've read about so far only the Oxford (Astro Zeniga) doesn't and it has a much lower success rate. It depends on the regimen though. 60-70% I think. Can't remember for sure.

First shot is about 70% but second approximate 90 %.  Still a bit lower than Moderna and Pfizer, but it's so much cheaper and easier to distribute, so it's has its advantage. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2020 at 1:30 PM, Virt said:

First shot is about 70% but second approximate 90 %.  Still a bit lower than Moderna and Pfizer, but it's so much cheaper and easier to distribute, so it's has its advantage. 

 

 

 

Yet yesterday and today AstraZenica is backpedaling on its results and trying to explain some issues due to several inconsistencies.  One of which is why a first injection given as a full injection was less effective than that of a half injection.  The devils in the details and waiting to hear clarifying info as to what in the hell is really going on.

 

AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 Vaccine: What You Need to Know - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

Edited by onthedarkside
questionable source link removed
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheFreqFlyer said:

When I saw the source I immediately knew the writers were trying to sell us their speculative version of the future as if they know what will happen. The Thaiger is also a very biased source so I take what they are trying to sell us with a grain of salt. 


Fact is, no one actually knows. As you rightfully point out, there are many practical and ethical concerns. However, Thailand will not, and can not, impose a unilateral vaccine mandate on it's own volition. It's international bodies such as the WHO that set the policy. If the WHO makes such a policy recommendation AND Thailand adopts it, then so too will nearly every country in the region and most countries on Earth. Thailand's policy will not be either less or more stringent than that of any other nation. Just look at the situation pre-Covid.

 

Like most thinking folk, I have serious concerns about the legality, risk of side effects, especially of a rushed pandemic vaccine using new experimental technology never previously employed before and the practicality of all this. I don't see a vaccine requirement being imposed in the near term. There is no precedent for a mandatory pandemic vaccine as a travel requirement, so to see it rolled out in 2021 is wishful thinking.

 

Instead, a digital health pass with testing information is much more likely. Prior to Covid, I became aware of an EU digital vaccine passport initiative being developed, but this is not expected to enter into force until at least 2023. I think that IF a vaccine requirement were to come into play to cross borders, I don't see it happening before 2022 or 2023 at the earliest. 

enough time to go off grid

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaccines start in the US next week!

 

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/donald-trump-says-coronavirus-vaccine-deliveries-to-begin-next-week/story-jtYmYoZ7txwn2vG3q2aLvM.html

 

Fly to the US and get your shot and onward to Thailand. That is, if Thailand allow entry. I don't see the need for quarantine if someone has been vaccinated. Might need 2 shots though.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Virt said:

First shot is about 70% but second approximate 90 %.  Still a bit lower than Moderna and Pfizer, but it's so much cheaper and easier to distribute, so it's has its advantage. 

 

 

 

I question Thailand's ability to distribute a drug that needs to be at a very low temp.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, elgenon said:

Yes, I know but so far it sounds less effective. Who knows which ones they will pick.

It sounds just as effective as the other front runners. When administered as a half dose followed by a full dose its 90+% effective. Thailand and UK have opted for AZ vaccine. More doses of AZ vaccine have already been manufactured than any other and, being less sensitive to storage temperature, makes it ideal for distribution in 3rd world countries. AZ are also distributing it at cost ie $3 per dose. Phizer will cost $19.50 per dose and Moderna want to make a real killing selling their vaccine at $25-$37 per dose. Bear in mind that the US vaccines require 2 doses and the UK vaccine 1 1/2 doses.

 

https://www.biospace.com/article/comparing-covid-19-vaccines-pfizer-biontech-moderna-astrazeneca-oxford-j-and-j-russia-s-sputnik-v/

 

 

Edited by polpott
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here the one for AZ

Astra vaccine's 90% efficacy in COVID came in younger population - BNN Bloomberg

Make your evaluation then.

 

AZ is selling already this vaccine.

Thailand signs deal with AstraZeneca for Covid vaccine – Malaysia Today (malaysia-today.net)

 

 

 

 

Edited by onthedarkside
quote of hidden post removed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tech65 said:

AZ are also distributing it at cost ie $3 per dose. Phizer will cost $19.50 per dose and Moderna want to make a real killing selling their vaccine at $25-$37 per dose.

I don't quite understand the relevance of price difference of $10-20 when it comes to life and death..14 year olds in 3rd world countries like Cuba are holding $500 smartphones..If they can find money for a stupid phone 20 times the price of a vaccine, they sure as hell can be creative and find $20 to save their lives

Edited by pattayadude
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2020 at 3:05 PM, Tech65 said:

 

 

Regarding the under 55 data, here's an extract from your link that explains what I've alreadty explained to you.

"The dose of AstraZeneca Plc’s Covid vaccine that showed the highest level of effectiveness was tested in a younger population than a bigger dose that showed less efficacy, according to the head of the U.S. Operation Warp Speed program.

The vaccine being developed with Oxford University was 90 per cent effective when a half-dose was given before a full-dose booster, the partners said on Monday. However, that regime was administered to participants in a group whose age was capped at 55,"

Edited by onthedarkside
hidden content removed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...