Jump to content

Britain, EU set Sunday deadline to clinch Brexit trade deal


webfact

Recommended Posts

Britain, EU set Sunday deadline to clinch Brexit trade deal

By Gabriela Baczynska and Elizabeth Piper

 

2020-12-09T225945Z_2_LYNXMPEGB81M3_RTROPTP_4_BRITAIN-EU-JOHNSON.JPG

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen welcomes British Prime Minister Boris Johnson in Brussels, Belgium December 9, 2020. Olivier Hoslet/Pool via REUTERS

 

BRUSSELS/LONDON (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the European Union's chief executive gave themselves until Sunday for last-ditch negotiations on a post-Brexit trade deal after failing to narrow differences during a "frank discussion" over dinner in Brussels.

 

"Very large gaps remain between the two sides and it is still unclear whether these can be bridged," a senior source in the British prime minister's office said in a statement.

 

He said Johnson did not want to leave "any route to a possible deal untested", and so he and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had agreed to further discussions over the next few days between their negotiating teams.

Von der Leyen echoed the British comments on the meeting in a separate statement.

 

The two sides agreed that a decision on whether a deal is possible before Britain finally leaves the EU's orbit on Jan. 1 would be taken by the end of the weekend.

 

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived for crisis talks over dinner in Brussels with the European Union's chief executive on Wednesday, amid mounting concern that Britain is heading for a turbulent break-up with the bloc in three weeks.

 

Fears are running high of a chaotic no-deal finale to the five-year Brexit crisis.

 

The EU and Britain had cast Thursday's meeting as a chance to break an impasse in negotiations but both acknowledged there was a danger that a trade deal would elude them.

 

Britain formally left the bloc in January, but has since been in a transition period during which it remains in the EU single market and customs union, meaning that rules on trade, travel and business have stayed the same.

 

That ends on Dec. 31. If by then there is no agreement to protect around $1 trillion in annual trade from tariffs and quotas, businesses on both sides will suffer.

 

Earlier Johnson said Brussels wanted Britain to comply with new EU laws in the future or be automatically punished, and was insisting it give up sovereign control over its fishing waters.

 

"I don't believe that those are terms that any prime minister of this country should accept," he told the British parliament, to cheers from lawmakers in his Conservative Party.

 

Johnson said "a good deal" could still be done if the EU scrapped its demands, but Britain would prosper with or without a trade deal, a phrase he repeated as he left for Brussels.

 

Failure to agree a deal would snarl borders, shock financial markets and sow chaos through supply chains in a world already grappling with the economic cost of COVID-19.

 

(Reporting by Paul Sandle, Kate Holton, Padraic Halpin, Elizabeth Piper and William James in London, John Chalmers, Gabriela Baczynska and Robin Emmott in Brussels, and Paul Carrel and Thomas Escritt in Berlin; Writing by Guy Faulconbridge and John Chalmers; Editing by Catherine Evans)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-12-10
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

 

You have that the wrong way round.

The Eu's position was made clear before the referendum. Its you Brexiteers who couldnt make your mind up as to what Brexit actually meant. 

It meant getting out of the EU, the same as you want to get out of the UK, but how strange you slag off UK negotiations yet say nothing about your UK exit futility......But, amusing.....????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rookiescot said:

 

Getting out of the EU under what conditions?

The rest of your post is yet another deflection to a straw man and will be ignored. 

It's great you want to ignore my valid point, because you have no answer ....????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Surelynot said:

So Boris now faces these two choices......

 

1. Accept a deal, annoying the ERG, who will then remove him from office.

 

2. Accept a no deal, selling the whole of the UK down the river, in order to save his own skin.

 

I know which my money is on.

Yes, if you are from across the channel, funding the big UK exit cash hole......????

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Surelynot said:

Rolling over trade deals we already have.

Treating asylum seekers even worse than we do now

Withdrawing from the ECHR

Weakening labour laws and environmental laws

Reducing our commitments to foreign overseas aid

Destroying large sections of our agricultural industry

Destruction of our car industry

Creating a hostile environment for academics and health workers

Allowing tax avoidance for the wealthy to continue whilst reducing Universal Credit

 

What a wonderful future our new found freedoms promise

Still assuming/guessing I see......:clap2:

Oh, did I read you want more UK money given away to foreign lands............:cheesy:

Edited by transam
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Surelynot said:

No.....assuming or intentionally misreading? 

 

The % promised repeatedly by Johnson and Raab will suffice.....bearing in mind it is a % of GDP so the actual value should drop markedly over the next decade.

Hey, you wrote it, but once again your reply is amusing.............????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, edwinchester said:

Is this the 'oven ready', 'easiest deal in history', 'able to be negotiated over a cup of tea in an afternoon' trade deal these charlatans were selling to the British public all those years ago?

Sunday,  scallops will be served for breakfast, lunch and dinner

Edited by Opl
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, transam said:

It's great you want to ignore my valid point, because you have no answer ....????

You didnt make a point. I asked what conditions we were leaving on?

You however again try to deflect onto an argument over your own baseless assertion. 

Again. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...