Jump to content

EU's Barnier says: just hours left for a Brexit trade deal


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Loiner said:

I'm not absolutely sure what your point is here, but absolutely sure it's rubbish anyway. You told us that "...it's a little bit more difficult to agree on a compromise when 27 sovereignties work together.." and I understand that to mean the EU cannot be pragmatic.

 

Whatever you are trying to say above does not display any pragmatism in obtaining a deal with a strong negotiator like the UK. Your 27 as 1 vs 1 would be accepted as bullying in the school yard, but hasn't been successful anyway. Time for the strongest of your 27 to start being pragmatic with your remainder.

what else do you have in your hand when EU fishermen receive financial support in compensation for losing access to British waters?    

What do you have in your hand when negotiating with China or the US? 

What do you get whith your post-Brexit deals that you wouldn't get as member as the EU? 

Edited by Opl
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Surelynot said:

Johnson...folding, as expected, like a cheap suit.

Screen Shot 2563-12-22 at 03.27.07.png

The British demand for a 60% reduction in the catch by value in British waters had been reduced to 35%, far closer to the 25% reduction that Frost’s EU counterpart, Michel Barnier, had said he would be prepared to accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

Funny how Remainers always confuse compromising during a negotiation as folding ????.

 

Fortunately, since the EU is unable to compromise on absolutely anything, Boris' kind offer to get this deal through will come to nothing. Obviously he knows that, which is why he made the offer in the first place. This very generous offer by the UK and subsequent refusal by the EU will be another excellent example of the bad faith exhibited by the EU when we rip up the WA in a few months time.

Excellent reponse.......very good.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Opl said:

You're right.

it was also easier to compromise in order to "please" and keep a member, than to compromise to cope with the consequences of a leaving member's sole decision. 

The Single Market integrity is as prevalent to the remaining members, as it was to the UK - there is no change. 

Perhaps if the EU and the UK had compromised back in 2015/2016, Brexit may not have happened.

 

You cannot change history, but you can learn from it if you want to. That goes equally for both sides.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, overherebc said:

How many of those who voted to leave had the slightest idea what they were voting for?

My opinion, they only thought they had was that it would make a difference to immigration figures. Outside that idea they had no other thoughts.

Here is snapshot of why voters voted remain or leave

Nearly half (49%) of leave voters said the biggest single reason for wanting to leave the EU was “the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK”. One third (33%) said the main reason was that leaving “offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.”

https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vinny41 said:

Here is snapshot of why voters voted remain or leave

Nearly half (49%) of leave voters said the biggest single reason for wanting to leave the EU was “the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK”. One third (33%) said the main reason was that leaving “offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.”

https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/

Those could have been negotiated for the same length of time and watered down versions implemented to keep the great unwashed happy.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, overherebc said:

Those could have been negotiated for the same length of time and watered down versions implemented to keep the great unwashed happy.

Negotiate?

 

With the EU?

 

Have you learned nothing? ????????????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

since the EU is unable to compromise on absolutely anything

 

I don't know the real reason.

 

Put I wrote here already my " Conspiration Theory " being :

 

The E.U. wasn't pleased at all when the U.K. left the Union.

They decided that further cooperation with the U.K. would only be at their specific conditions, and only prepared to compromise a itsy-bitsy.

If the U.K. would accept their conditions or a part of it, it would be a " sweet revenge " for the E.U..

They know that the U.K. could step away at any time.

(In the meantime , it is a fact that after years and years, they still haven't)

The E.U. know that no deal will certainly cause a lot of problems, they are however convinced that the U.K. would be confronted with a lot of problems too.

So a loose-loose seems acceptable for the E.U., hence a no real desire to compromise.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...