proof of return flight for visa purposes

[jimwah]

Good day everyone. This is my first post so i hope you will forgive if my questions are in the incorrect forum.

I will be travelling(hopefully) to Thailand in July, this year. I am planning on applying for a tourist visa from the Thai Embassy in Los Angeles. Upon arrival in Thailand, i will be applying for a 9 month Education Visa, with one of the language schools in Pattaya. I have spoken and emailed the school(which receives high marks from students, plus from 2 friends who have attended). They will submit my request for a ED visa for me. 

My question is this: When applying to the Thai Embassy in Los Angeles,  they require proof of a return flight to my home country. Since my tourist visa will be for 60 days, do i book a flight showing a return flight 60 days after departure (i assume the embassy will want exact dates of arrival and departure, since i have to provide them with written flight confirmation) or since i will actual be in Thailand for nearly 1 year, should i book a flight that returns in one year? i am concerned they could deny my visa, because i am applying for a 60 day visa but my  flight itinerary shows a return flight nearly 1 year after arrival.

Your suggestions are very much appreciated.

[justmaybe]

A ticket out of the Kingdom is all you will need- I usually purchase one to Singapore, but no specific destination is required. It does not need to be a ticket home. That is a legitimate way to solve the problem in my experience.

 

[jimwah]

Justmaybe--Thank you so much for your feedback. I do not have previous experience in this type of situation, so i was not sure.

[UncleMhee]

@jimwah I'd suggest to book your outward bound flight for 60 days after entry as at that is the length of stay you're assured of. Talk to the carrier re changing dates for free or at low cost should the Ed visa plans come to fruition.

Just my personal opinion and I'm sure I'll be put back in my box if I'm speaking BS

[ubonjoe]

You will need a flight out of the country to apply for a single entry tourist visa.

Info here on LA consulate website. https://thaiconsulatela.org/en/visa/visa-type/tourist-visa-category-tr-single/

[mtls2005]

DC , not LA but perhaps informative.

 

 

[mtls2005]

Maybe consider a round-trip ticket on Qatar Airways - they have an extremely flexible change policy - for LAX-DOH-BKK/BKK-DOH-LAX ($1,280 all in) with a return within your CoE window (45/60 days). Then once in Thailand re-arrange your return? You may be subject to a fare increase if your desired fare bucket is sold out. It wouldn't be much more than $200 if anything?

https://www.qatarairways.com/en/travel-with-confidence.html

 

8 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Would seem to me, or my thought, would be my usual jump from LAX, as Ive done over a dozen times, to BKK......NEVER ever in those times have I ever had a visa

 

This is more about the requirement for an onward ticket in the current COVID/CoE times. At least that's what I took from the title and OP.

 

 

[mtls2005]

 

23 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Not sure due to crazy covid rules..Ive always gone to LOS with a one way tix....a dozen times...never been an issue with airlines at LAX

Yes, we are talking about the current situation.

[DrJack54]

34 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

.Ive always gone to LOS with a one way tix....a dozen times...never been an issue with airlines at LAX,

I'm not doubting your statement, however I would caution people taking your experience as the norm since it is not the norm. Prior to Covid I flew in and out of Thailand every month. I can assure you that at places such as Saigon at check in they look in your passport for reentry permit or visa if not there they will ask to see onward ticket. Don't have then you don't fly.

[DrJack54]

Just now, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Makes note to stay out of Saigon........

I used it as an example. I have had same experience in various places. Not sure what point your trying to prove. I can assure you what I posted is the norm.

[mtls2005]

Just to be very, very clear, one needs a Certificate of Entry, among other requirements: Covid test, Fit to Fly certificate, insurance, ASQ rez, etc., from a Thai embassy/consulate in order to travel to Thailand.

Some/most/many/all? Thai embassies and consulates require proof of onward travel within the term of your intended stay prior to issuing a CoE.

I think we can all agree that pre-COVID some airlines did not enforce the proof of onward travel requirement, and some others did.  Obviously this is not relevant to the current situation, or to this topic.

[natway09]

A decent airline will understand what you want & as long as the right class of ticket will issue a return within the 60 days which you can change 2 times without a charge except the $20 ticket fee (Some airlines up to 2 years)

[BUMMERJACK]

I got to my ASQ 24h ago, so I've done all of this. I booked a 60$ ticket from BKK to Malaysia, which I'm just gonna throw in the bin. However, some people do get flights where you can cancel for refund, or simply reschedule to a later date. All of them work, it's just a matter of what option you prefer.

The "just getting oneway tix saying ill leave in a month" will 100% not work under current circumstances.

[jimwah]

Thanks for all of your responses. Most likely, i will book a return flight in 60 days and then change my return date with the airlines. Time for me to contact the different carriers for further info. I will pass on my outcome in the future.

[Aomelia]

For years I came to Thailand on TV and never had return flt booked has it changed I know one time I came over with no visa and  airline had me book refundable ticket 

[Aomelia]

10 hours ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Not sure due to crazy covid rules..Ive always gone to LOS with a one way tix....a dozen times...never been an issue with airlines at LAX, as I say I will fly out after my 30 days.....or I say its not my final destination Im just packing around, as I always just take a carry on... Ive come to use EVA air..nice and reliable..red eye out of LAX $550

Did you have tourist visa , if you have I’ve never been stopped but I didn’t one time and made me book RT

[DrJack54]

4 minutes ago, Aomelia said:

For years I came to Thailand on TV and never had return flt booked has it changed I know one time I came over with no visa and  airline had me book refundable ticket 

If you have a visa the airline has no issue.

If you are flying visa exempt to Thailand then in most cases the airline will insist on an onward flight.

The onward flight is an airline issue. Very rarely with immigration is it a problem.

[Greenwich Boy]

I have one of those faces that check in staff love. In the last couple of years I have been asked for an onward flight twice from Hong Kong and once Yangon. I have always had one.

You can get away with it as many times as you like but you only need to come unstuck once. There are plenty of legit options. Just pony up a few quid and avoid the hassle.

[gargamon]

Pre-Covid I would always go without an onward ticket. If they(always the airline) require one, I'd log into expedia.com, purchase a fully refundable within 24 hours ticket, and give the info to the airline agent. Then, after I'm at the gate, I'd log in again to expedia and cancel the ticket. Total costs $0.00. 

Never buy an onward ticket from the airline you're about to fly on.

[AUinAsia]

10 hours ago, BUMMERJACK said:

I got to my ASQ 24h ago, so I've done all of this. I booked a 60$ ticket from BKK to Malaysia, which I'm just gonna throw in the bin. However, some people do get flights where you can cancel for refund, or simply reschedule to a later date. All of them work, it's just a matter of what option you prefer.

The "just getting oneway tix saying ill leave in a month" will 100% not work under current circumstances.

Are you sure a ticket to Malaysia will help though? Considering travel to Malaysia is considered likely to be banned until at least 2022. I am assuming they will think about that when checking the ticket. I was thinking about booking a cheap ticket to Singapore, but thinking it won't live since travel to Singapore is also forbidden.

[Aomelia]

On 3/21/2021 at 8:42 AM, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Nope..have gone to LOS over a dozen times--depart out of LAX...NEVER have i had a VISA..always get the 30 days stamp arriving at BKK..always one way tix

this may have changed due to covid..but I last went in nov 2018--left march 16 2019..regretfully

Japan Airlines made me buy return , shocking they let you fly 

[DrJack54]

15 minutes ago, Aomelia said:

Japan Airlines made me buy return , shocking they let you fly 

Don't believe every tale that you read.

[ubonjoe]

2 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Been doing this since my first arrival in 2008 and been doing it yearly

 

You have not gotten everything you wrote about since 2008.

The 30 day extensions of visa exempt entries did start until August of 2014.

At border crossings it was a 15 day visa exempt until 2015. That is also when they started restricting them to 2 per calendar year.

You have only been lucky you were not forced to buy a ticket out of the country within 30 days. I certainly would not suggest anybody try it or at least be prepared to buy a ticket.

[mtls2005]

10 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Arrive swampy---USA passport---flip-flip-flip--then bam--stamped

This is irrelevant in the current situation.

 

Pre-COVID some airlines might deny boarding to traveller without a visa (TVE), without proof of onward travel. 

 

Now, you might need proof of onward travel in order to obtain permission (CoE) to Thailand, with our without a visa (TVE).

 

And you might need proof of onward travel when checking in for your first segment traveling to Thailand.

 

It's really a simple concept: then and now, not same-same.

[Salerno]

6 minutes ago, ubonjoe said:

At border crossings it was a 15 day visa exempt until 2015.

 

G7 nations still got 30 days when it was reduced to 15 for other nationalities if memory serves, so it's plausible for the BM in question given he's American.

[ubonjoe]

10 minutes ago, Salerno said:

G7 nations still got 30 days when it was reduced to 15 for other nationalities if memory serves, so it's plausible for the BM in question given he's American.

That did not start until late 2014. Until then it was 15 days for everybody.

[Salerno]

4 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

but my point being I have never boarded a plane in LAX headed to LOS with a VISA.

 

I've never gotten a visa either; but that's totally irrelevant to this thread and the current requirements.

[mtls2005]

12 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Is one not allowed to reminisce?

 

Sure. We can always make room for memories. 

 

But generally staying relevant and on topic is preferred.

 

Your constant harkening back to the mystical days of yore may confuse some who think you actually know what you're talking about.

 

 

[Salerno]

9 minutes ago, ubonjoe said:

That did not start until late 2014. Until then it was 15 days for everybody.

 

1st of November 2013 actually but yes, doesn't gel with the BM talking about doing it since 2008.