Jump to content

EURO 2020


stament

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Kadilo said:

Simple. He’s still a human being and no amount of money can buy perfection. 

It could buy it in the case of Thierry Henry. 22 penalties in the Prem, none missed.

 

Or in the case of Peter Beardsley, 17 pens, none missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its about time these players and managers were paid on a performance based criteria, most certainly the England manager. The sole aim of a national team is to win tournaments. Not just have a nice game, get compliments for playing attractive football but still losing. Not having excuses like "our best player" was injured etc etc. but actually winning major tournaments. In the case of England there is the World cup, Euros and now the Nations cup.  The aim should be to win them. The FA should appoint a manager on that basis and pay him accordingly, not pay him millions as is the case now to not win anything. In they years he has been there  and won nothing they still want him to go to Quatar where no doubt this tactically useless manager will succeed in winning nothing again.

 

No, time for a change, time for people, especially an England manager to get paid for what he is worth and his worth can only be determined by what the national team wins.  So pay him still a high salary of say 150 k per year ( well they need that don't they to buy their designer suits when they prance up and down the technical area), and if they win one of those major tournaments he gets a bonus of say 2 million. You may then get a manager then whose sole intent is to win, rather than never win anything and make excuses but spend more time wondering how to invest his multi million pound salary earned winning nothing

Edited by Excel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Excel said:

Its about time these players and managers were paid on a performance based criteria, most certainly the England manager. The sole aim of a national team is to win tournaments. Not just have a nice game, get compliments for playing attractive football but still losing. Not having excuses like "our best player" was injured etc etc. but actually winning major tournaments. In the case of England there is the World cup, Euros and now the Nations cup.  The aim should be to win them. The FA should appoint a manager on that basis and pay him accordingly, not pay him millions as is the case now to not win anything. In they years he has been there  and won nothing they still want him to go to Quatar where no doubt this tactically useless manager will succeed in winning nothing again.

 

No, time for a change, time for people, especially an England manager to get paid for what he is worth and his worth can only be determined by what the national team wins.  So pay him still a high salary of say 150 k per year ( well they need that don't they to buy their designer suits when they prance up and down the technical area), and if they win one of those major tournaments he gets a bonus of say 2 million. You may then get a manager then whose sole intent is to win, rather than never win anything and make excuses but spend more time wondering how to invest his multi million pound salary earned winning nothing

The the next job managerial role applications  would receive applications from Paul Gascoigne, Sol Campbell and Harry , current job being part time manager of the Kings head Sunday league team and part time steward at Wembley 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...