Matches what I experienced; I was about 50 when I became aware of the sad reality that I needed more than 20 to 30 minutes between ejaculations. Now I've learnt to deal with it and make sure to get into some novel kinky stuff in between penetrations. Otherwise, especially with viagra, a long session of "in and out may" and up in pitiful exhaustion instead of a glorious climax. 

I'm not as good as I once was..

 

But I'm as good once as I ever was..

1 hour ago, RafPinto said:

Chasing young women????

Why not?

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Define "downhill"

I can confirm that 20 years ago I was horny all the time. Now not (all the time) anymore.

Is that good or bad?

Personally I think it's good. Because if I think now about the time when I was young and the late night adventures to Thermae and other places and what I f$#%# at that time I don't really want to remember that too clearly anymore.

Now if I go out and I meet a girl who makes me horny, fine. And if not that is also fine, no "I need to find something/anything" anymore.

Don't all men want a decreased libido when older to renuncuiate?

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

How the Brit government can consider moving the state pension age to 70 years old is totally incomprehensible.

not if they are the ones paying

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

At 66 the best I can manage is walking 6Km/day.

not too bad - you will be on the beach in Vietnam in a few months... 

2 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Don't all men want a decreased libido when older to renuncuiate?

No.

I get a pension on 11 years, I hope I can keep it up til then. Actually, be quite content to make it to 67, but would be nice to get 10 years of spending it.