webfact Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 Picture: Siam Rath Siam Rath reported on a judgment from the Administrative Court in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand, in a high profile forestry land encroachment case. The office of the Court of Justice took the Treasury Department to court over the construction of a housing estate on just over 143 rai of land in Don Kaeo, Mae Rim. It was alleged that houses and administrative offices were in part constructed on land belonging to the Doi Suthep national park. The court has decided that this is not the case and the land is in fact outside the park area and the Treasury Department were within their rights. -- © Copyright ASEAN NOW 2022-07-28 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. Monthly car subscription with first-class insurance, 24x7 assistance and more in one price - click here to find out more! Get your business in front of millions of customers who read ASEAN NOW with an interest in Thailand every month - email [email protected] for more information 3 1
Popular Post AnnaBanana Posted July 28, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 28, 2022 Did they reach this decision after consulting maps or after being bought off? 11 4
Popular Post worgeordie Posted July 28, 2022 Popular Post Posted July 28, 2022 Redraw the maps , everything OK now , but the Army have taken over the houses , will the judges be allowed to move in. regards Worgeordie 2 1
Shuya Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 The court desided the housing estate of the court is not illegal? I can't see any flaw in that... 2
klauskunkel Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 That's probably those vacation homes for judges and court personnel the government built a few years back... 1
Burma Bill Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 6 hours ago, webfact said: The court has decided that this is not the case and the land is in fact outside the park area and the Treasury Department were within their rights Oh really???? I'll let you all decide - photo taken in 2018, but still a "blot on the landscape" today despite more trees (check on Google Earth): https://thethaiger.com/news/national/the-top-10-news-stories-for-thailand-in-2018 2
hotchilli Posted July 28, 2022 Posted July 28, 2022 13 hours ago, Burma Bill said: Oh really???? I'll let you all decide - photo taken in 2018, but still a "blot on the landscape" today despite more trees (check on Google Earth): https://thethaiger.com/news/national/the-top-10-news-stories-for-thailand-in-2018 A few more tree left standing between houses would have been nicer. 1
Katipo Posted July 29, 2022 Posted July 29, 2022 Whether or not it was in protected land would have been obvious from the very beginning. Lines on a map tend to rather east to see. The fact this unsurprisingly reversal of the original judgement took so long suggests strongly that something dodgy took place. I mean, judges deciding whether judges' exclusive hillside compound is legal or not was only ever going to go one way. 1
JeffersLos Posted July 29, 2022 Posted July 29, 2022 Chiang Mai judges find that lovely housing estate built for Chiang Mai judges in Mae Rim is legal. 1 1 1
mania Posted August 25, 2022 Posted August 25, 2022 On 7/28/2022 at 11:42 PM, JeffersLos said: Chiang Mai judges find that lovely housing estate built for Chiang Mai judges in Mae Rim is legal. ^^^ ???? ^^^ True
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now