Jump to content

U.S. aircraft carrier arrives in South Korea as warning to North


Recommended Posts

Posted

US navy aircraft carrier san francisco

BUSAN, South Korea, Sept 23 (Reuters) - A U.S. aircraft carrier arrived in South Korea on Friday for the first time in about four years, set to join other military vessels in a show of force intended to send a message to North Korea.

USS Ronald Reagan and ships from its accompanying strike group docked at a naval base in the southern port city of Busan ahead of joint drills with South Korean forces.

Its arrival marks the most significant deployment yet under a new push to have more U.S. "strategic assets" operate in the area to deter North Korea.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-aircraft-carrier-arrives-south-korea-warning-north-korea-2022-09-22/

image.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, mania said:

Sadly it looks daily more & more like they will get what they want & throw this world into WWIII

Did'nt WWIII start in 2019 when a certain country unleashed Covid 19 on the world that has so far killed more than 6.5 million people?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, 2baht said:

Should the West bow to Emperor Xi, Czar Putin and Rocket Man?

No of course never but John Quincy Adams, Secretary of State

said it best about America..

"But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy"

I have attached his speech which is short & worth the read IMHO

 

1821secofstateJQAdmas.pdf

Edited by mania
  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, mania said:

No of course never but John Quincy Adams, Secretary of State

said it best about America..

"But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy"

I have attached his speech which is short & worth the read IMHO

 

1821secofstateJQAdmas.pdf 15.4 kB · 1 download

Perhaps that speech could be printed on large notice boards to use as protection for American and its allies to ward off the bombs, bullets and missiles of tyrants who are repeatedly stating their military intentions.

Posted
20 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Reversing the groveling and kowtowing of the previous administration is not ‘war mongering’.

 

Being pally with tyrants and saluting their generals has only emboldened America’s adversaries.

The usual need to deflect to previous admins has nothing to do with now

 

This is war mongering pure & simple

 

Example #1 Giving Billions in weapons to Ukraine has nothing to do with so called caring for democracy as they could care less for the Ukrainians instead it is selling weapons albeit once again on US taxpayers dime & then given freely to the Ukranians to Taunt Russia & Let Ukraine fight a proxy war

 

Example #2 The so called love of Taiwan & helping to protect their freedoms? Right...  first House Speaker to visit Taiwan since Newt Gingrich in 1997

So instead just once again selling/promising  weapons/support again while US taxpayers pay & to Taunt China

 

Example #3 now this silly show in South Korea to what? Taunt N Korea is all

 

America's only adversaries these days are in the White House & trying their best to start a WWIII

Posted
3 hours ago, heybruce said:

Right.  It's not like North Korea is building nuclear weapons, testing ICBM's, threatening its neighbor, or has ever attacked anyone.

 

Oh, wait.....

So we should also attack Israel or thats ok?

Cut the nonsense we are not the police of this world

 

Posted
2 hours ago, mania said:

The usual need to deflect to previous admins has nothing to do with now

 

This is war mongering pure & simple

 

Example #1 Giving Billions in weapons to Ukraine has nothing to do with so called caring for democracy as they could care less for the Ukrainians instead it is selling weapons albeit once again on US taxpayers dime & then given freely to the Ukranians to Taunt Russia & Let Ukraine fight a proxy war

 

Example #2 The so called love of Taiwan & helping to protect their freedoms? Right...  first House Speaker to visit Taiwan since Newt Gingrich in 1997

So instead just once again selling/promising  weapons/support again while US taxpayers pay & to Taunt China

 

Example #3 now this silly show in South Korea to what? Taunt N Korea is all

 

America's only adversaries these days are in the White House & trying their best to start a WWIII

Out of curiosity.

 

Where do you get your news?

Posted
2 hours ago, mania said:

So we should also attack Israel or thats ok?

Cut the nonsense we are not the police of this world

 

The US has in the past tried isolationism, how did that work out?

 

What kind of world does Putin have in mind?

 

How about Kim, what do you think he wants?

 

Or the  Chinese, what are their ambitions?

 

And since you dragged Israel into this (I wonder why), should the Israeli’s sit on their hands while history repeats itself.

Posted (edited)
On 9/24/2022 at 10:20 AM, mania said:

No of course never but John Quincy Adams, Secretary of State

said it best about America..

"But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy"

I have attached his speech which is short & worth the read IMHO

 

1821secofstateJQAdmas.pdf 15.4 kB · 2 downloads

 

3 hours ago, mania said:

So we should also attack Israel or thats ok?

Cut the nonsense we are not the police of this world

 

North Korea is not simply a country with a different political approach or different world view - it is a obviously controlled by a dictator who can only keep his people, and the world, at bay by threatening death and destruction, including a nuclear arsenal that can strike harder and further, with each year that passes.

One needs to be proactive. In Adams times, we are talking about attacks by wooden war ships with cannon balls, and soldiers with bayonets. Not ballistic missiles sent from 15,000 kilometres away. 

Edited by Fat is a type of crazy
  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, mania said:

So we should also attack Israel or thats ok?

Cut the nonsense we are not the police of this world

 

Why would we attack anyone?

 

I also think that Israel would not threaten to nuke its neighbors if US ships visited neighboring countries.

Posted

Back when DT went to N. Korean there were clues that his real motivation was to open a resort on the NK coast.  Dig through archives and you'll find his hints.  Wouldn't it be something if he ended up in exile there?

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, bendejo said:

Back when DT went to N. Korean there were clues that his real motivation was to open a resort on the NK coast.  Dig through archives and you'll find his hints.  Wouldn't it be something if he ended up in exile there?

 

 

Haven't the North Koreans suffered enough?

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...