Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Inside McCarthy’s sudden warming to a Biden impeachment inquiry

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, Trippy said:

Only the dept of justice can prosecute, congress has no such power.

And what does the DoJ need to prosecute?

 

Hard verifiable proof and evidence.

 

So where IS the hard verifiable proof and evidence?

  • Replies 109
  • Views 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Naa it’s about taking heat off and or distracting from trumpeys very real and serious legal problems  it’s so obvious even a child can see through it McCarthy got his orders meh…..

  • SunnyinBangrak
    SunnyinBangrak

    Absolutely untrue.   The worst allegations are that Biden took part in extorting Chinese nationals as per the infamous "im sitting here with my father.." texts, and that Biden acted to enric

  • Why bother? Dems will never publicly believe, Senate will never convict, and justice dept will never prosecute. Bidens are above the law presently. 

Posted Images

I think all this political hammering is just another smokescreen—so they can jack up the Baht without anyone noticing or caring.

5 minutes ago, Isaan sailor said:

I think all this political hammering is just another smokescreen—so they can jack up the Baht without anyone noticing or caring.

OMG. Nobody would notice?

40 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

That's it? On what grounds?

Watch the vdo.

20 minutes ago, billd766 said:

And what does the DoJ need to prosecute?

 

Desire! No matter the evidence they can decline to prosecute. You think the people in charge are not biased?

 

The impeachment investigation and this thread is like hitting your head against a wall. Nobody's mind will be changed no matter anything said. It's all a waste of time.

36 minutes ago, billd766 said:

And you believe a proven serial liar?

Which one?

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, Trippy said:

Desire! No matter the evidence they can decline to prosecute. You think the people in charge are not biased?

 

The impeachment investigation and this thread is like hitting your head against a wall. Nobody's mind will be changed no matter anything said. It's all a waste of time.

No, they are not biased, they are career professionals. Cut the conspiracy BS.

  • Popular Post
1 minute ago, nauseus said:

Watch the vdo.

I did and I also read this so I stand by my claim

 

“It’s clear that Donald Trump is the real Speaker of the House,” Jaime Harrison, chair of the Democratic National Party, said in a statement. “He has made sure the House majority is little more than an arm of his 2024 campaign, and Kevin McCarthy is happy to do his bidding.”

 

Whereas you have?

  • Popular Post
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

I did and I also read this so I stand by my claim

 

“It’s clear that Donald Trump is the real Speaker of the House,” Jaime Harrison, chair of the Democratic National Party, said in a statement. “He has made sure the House majority is little more than an arm of his 2024 campaign, and Kevin McCarthy is happy to do his bidding.”

 

Whereas you have?

Well I can have a bit of a laugh at that. The DNC continue to make fantastic claims, as they always do, to direct focus onto Trump, instead of the Bidens. A lot like many of the pro Biden posters on here. 

  • Popular Post
2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Well I can have a bit of a laugh at that. The DNC continue to make fantastic claims, as they always do, to direct focus onto Trump, instead of the Bidens. A lot like many of the pro Biden posters on here. 

There's nothing against the Bidens except whack job accusations so far. When some tangible evidence leads to an indictment wake me up.

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Well I can have a bit of a laugh at that. The DNC continue to make fantastic claims, as they always do, to direct focus onto Trump, instead of the Bidens. A lot like many of the pro Biden posters on here. 

Yea you can laugh but Trump has been at it for months, this from Nov last year.

 

DONALD TRUMP IS calling his top allies in Congress to push for details on their plans for impeaching President Joe Biden and top administration officials

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/biden-impeachment-trump-republicans-midterms-1234625755/

13 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

There's nothing against the Bidens except whack job accusations so far. When some tangible evidence leads to an indictment wake me up.

Whack job accusations including from Democratic IRS agents?

 

If there is an indictment I'm sure you won't need me to wake you up.

11 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea you can laugh but Trump has been at it for months, this from Nov last year.

 

DONALD TRUMP IS calling his top allies in Congress to push for details on their plans for impeaching President Joe Biden and top administration officials

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/biden-impeachment-trump-republicans-midterms-1234625755/

I'm so glad I can't open that. Saves wasting my time.

Just now, nauseus said:

I'm so glad I can't open that. Saves wasting my time.

Ok don't bother with this link to it then. https://archive.ph/2if1M

28 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

There's nothing against the Bidens except whack job accusations so far. When some tangible evidence leads to an indictment wake me up.

The evidence is the bank records showing millions of dollars were funneled to the Bidens from foreign companies through multiple shell corps. There are also multiple witnesses and Hunter's emails that explain what the payments were for. 

 

But the Bidens are above the law, so who cares!

17 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Ok don't bother with this link to it then. https://archive.ph/2if1M

You are persistent - I read it - just a story with no real evidence of anything, as I supposed. 

3 minutes ago, nauseus said:

You are persistent - I read it - just a story with no real evidence of anything, as I supposed. 

Isn't that a bit like the accusations against Biden

 

"Trump’s ongoing discussions with Capitol Hill allies reveal his ongoing influence over the GOP caucus, as well as the power he’ll wield if Republicans win enough seats in Tuesday’s midterm elections to take over the House."

Edited by Bkk Brian

23 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Whack job accusations including from Democratic IRS agents?

 

If there is an indictment I'm sure you won't need me to wake you up.

The main claims of the whistleblowers (if true) are about events which occurred during Trump's mandate (they were alegedly prevented to investigate Hunter further, interview his children, etc...). How can it be a ground to impeach Joe?

  • Popular Post
10 minutes ago, Trippy said:

The evidence is the bank records showing millions of dollars were funneled to the Bidens from foreign companies through multiple shell corps. There are also multiple witnesses and Hunter's emails that explain what the payments were for. 

 

But the Bidens are above the law, so who cares!

Show the proof instead of just repeating the same drivel where there has never been shown what you state.

  • Popular Post
16 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Show the proof instead of just repeating the same drivel where there has never been shown what you state.

I'm a nobody living in Thailand, you think I have evidence in my hands. James Comer and congress has it.

 

 

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Trippy said:

I'm a nobody living in Thailand, you think I have evidence in my hands. James Comer and congress has it.

 

 

Comer said it! That's your evidence? 

  • Popular Post
33 minutes ago, Trippy said:

The evidence is the bank records showing millions of dollars were funneled to the Bidens from foreign companies through multiple shell corps. There are also multiple witnesses and Hunter's emails that explain what the payments were for. 

 

But the Bidens are above the law, so who cares!

Money was transferred. Ok. Emails explain it was about fees and expenses related to the project of creating a JV (which would, for example, have invested in a liquefied gas unit in the U.S.).

What's illegal about it?

What has Joe to do with it?

You have nothing!

  • Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Trippy said:

I'm a nobody living in Thailand, you think I have evidence in my hands. James Comer and congress has it.

No they don't and living in Thailand doesn't prevent you from knowing that they don't. I'm a nobody living in Thailand and I've never seen Comey front a scintilla of evidence. It looked like he might do until his main witness became a fugitive. Perhaps you think the DoJ charged him because they think he had something on Biden?

1 hour ago, Trippy said:

Desire! No matter the evidence they can decline to prosecute. You think the people in charge are not biased?

 

The impeachment investigation and this thread is like hitting your head against a wall. Nobody's mind will be changed no matter anything said. It's all a waste of time.

To initiate ANY prosecution I was under the impression that evidence and proof has to be brought before a public prosecutor before any prosecution can go forward or be declined.

 

Do you know something different? I am always willing to learn?

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

No they don't and living in Thailand doesn't prevent you from knowing that they don't. I'm a nobody living in Thailand and I've never seen Comey front a scintilla of evidence. It looked like he might do until his main witness became a fugitive. Perhaps you think the DoJ charged him because they think he had something on Biden?

Real evidence is usually presented at trial, not released to the public beforehand. But I tend to think a sitting US congressmen would not lie about having it in a speech. 

3 minutes ago, billd766 said:

To initiate ANY prosecution I was under the impression that evidence and proof has to be brought before a public prosecutor before any prosecution can go forward or be declined.

 

Do you know something different? I am always willing to learn?

Sounds right to me, did I say different?

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, nauseus said:

Which one?

There is only one serial liar with more than 30,xxx proven lies and falsehoods increasing every day. Its name is EX president Donald J Trump.

 

Just now, Trippy said:

Sounds right to me, did I say different?

Yes

2 minutes ago, Trippy said:

Real evidence is usually presented at trial, not released to the public beforehand. But I tend to think a sitting US congressmen would not lie about having it in a speech. 

Sure, but real evidence leads to an indictment where there is a prosecutable offense. The lack of an indictment is a hint that there is no evidence of an offense. The DoJ will prosecute every prosecutable offense.

Just now, billd766 said:

Yes

Sorry, I don't remember. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.