Etaoin Shrdlu Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 7 minutes ago, bignok said: Just expressed his opinion. The election wasnt overturned. Free speech is no longer in the USA. Freedom of speech in the US means that the government will not in advance say what one may or may not say before one says it. It does not mean that there won't be consequences of one's speech, including criminal prosecution for fraud or other criminal activity furthered by such speech. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 8 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said: Freedom of speech in the US means that the government will not in advance say what one may or may not say before one says it. It does not mean that there won't be consequences of one's speech, including criminal prosecution for fraud or other criminal activity furthered by such speech. So lying is ok if done by the mob. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pomchop Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 9 minutes ago, bignok said: Just expressed his opinion. The election wasnt overturned. Free speech is no longer in the USA. If you actually read the indictment and you think it was only about expressing his opinion then I hope you have no legal ambitions as you missed the entire points laid out. The primary reason that donnie is in deep doo doo is not that he expressed his opinion but that he conspired with others in a variety of crimes as are laid out in excruciating details backed by a mountain of evidence. The indictment spells out fact after fact that is no doubt further corraberated by documents, emails, texts, first hand testimony, audio and video tapes. Jack Smith is too smart to throw out a bunch of charges that can be shot down by claiming first amendment free speech. The crimes charged have nothing to do with free speech which anyone who has read it would recognize. In fact the very first page points out that trump has to right to run his big fat mouth and tell all the lies he wants to his supporters and the media. The fact that the election was not overturned has ZERO to do with the conspiracy charges....a conspiracy does not have to suceed to prove that there was a conspiracy to commit a crime which is against the law. First year law school stuff. 4 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 Name 1 US president who never told lies. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 Just now, pomchop said: If you actually read the indictment and you think it was only about expressing his opinion then I hope you have no legal ambitions as you missed the entire points laid out. The primary reason that donnie is in deep doo doo is not that he expressed his opinion but that he conspired with others in a variety of crimes as are laid out in excruciating details backed by a mountain of evidence. The indictment spells out fact after fact that is no doubt further corraberated by documents, emails, texts, first hand testimony, audio and video tapes. Jack Smith is too smart to throw out a bunch of charges that can be shot down by claiming first amendment free speech. The crimes charged have nothing to do with free speech which anyone who has read it would recognize. In fact the very first page points out that trump has to right to run his big fat mouth and tell all the lies he wants to his supporters and the media. The fact that the election was not overturned has ZERO to do with the conspiracy charges....a conspiracy does not have to suceed to prove that there was a conspiracy to commit a crime which is against the law. First year law school stuff. The BBC link has few details. I did first year Law. I see nothing in the link but fluff. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bkk Brian Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 Just now, bignok said: Name 1 US president who never told lies. Probably none. Now name one president who has conspired to overturn an election as laid out in the indictment. 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 hour ago, bignok said: I don't anything real here. All fake trumped up charges. He didn't cause the riots. All he did was question the election results. What part of enrolling people as fake electors is "questioning election results"? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pomchop Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 minute ago, bignok said: The BBC link has few details. I did first year Law. I see nothing in the link but fluff. you know a 30 second google would provide you with the indictment in full...you might want to take the time to read it ALL. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/01/politics/read-trump-january-6-indictment/index.html 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bkk Brian Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 minute ago, bignok said: The BBC link has few details. I did first year Law. I see nothing in the link but fluff. Fluff......? https://apnews.com/trump-election-2020-indictment The full indictment above 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pomchop Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: What part of enrolling people as fake electors is "questioning election results"? Edited August 2, 2023 by pomchop 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 hour ago, bignok said: Judge is a black woman appointed by Obama. No bias here. Tell us about Aileen Cannon. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 This guy looks dodgy as 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 minute ago, pomchop said: Wow... did you actually READ the indictment in full? I don't think so. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/01/politics/read-trump-january-6-indictment/index.html Yeah, there is a section on civil rights violations having to do with fake electors. Maybe you read it, but didn't understand it. Are there any alleged facts in the indictment that you think are untrue? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, pomchop said: Wow... did you actually READ the indictment in full? I don't think so. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/01/politics/read-trump-january-6-indictment/index.html Bunch of he said fluff. Sad sad US these days. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pomchop Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said: Fluff......? https://apnews.com/trump-election-2020-indictment The full indictment above It is obvious that a lot of the posters here have NOT read the indictment. Anyone with even a shred of understanding of the charges filed and the outline of evidence supporting those charges would grasp that donnie is in deep doo doo. Trump is free to lie all he wants and spin all he wants to his cult and to the media. Courts do not operate that way. https://www.cnn.com/2023/08/01/politics/read-trump-january-6-indictment/index.html 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 3 minutes ago, bignok said: This guy looks dodgy as If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, attack the prosecutor. 7 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pomchop Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, bignok said: Bunch of he said fluff. Sad sad US these days. Right. Got it. You did not read the indictment in full. 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 7 minutes ago, bignok said: Bunch of he said fluff. Sad sad US these days. Do you believe that all conspiracies are inherently legal because of the First Amendment? 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 Just now, Danderman123 said: Do you believe that all conspiracies are inherently legal because of the First Amendment? Free speech. End of story. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pomchop Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 10 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: Yeah, there is a section on civil rights violations having to do with fake electors. Maybe you read it, but didn't understand it. Are there any alleged facts in the indictment that you think are untrue? sorry i did not mean to respond to your post...a different one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post earlinclaifornia Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 6 minutes ago, bignok said: Free speech. End of story. Plead that to Fox News and send some dough to help pay that bill. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said: Can you stay on topic or just troll. Your so far off the beaten path. Free Speech by the way does not give one the ability to try and circumvent an election one lost like the indictment states. Try and read the indictment. Biden won. Trump didnt stop him. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
placeholder Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 9 minutes ago, bignok said: Free speech. End of story. Is making death threats also protected under free speech? Free speech is not an unlimited right. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post placeholder Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 1 minute ago, bignok said: Biden won. Trump didnt stop him. Failure does not exempt Trump from having committed a crime. 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post johnnybangkok Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 2 hours ago, bignok said: I don't anything real here. All fake trumped up charges. He didn't cause the riots. All he did was question the election results. Denial isn't just a river in Egypt. If it was simply just about him questioning the election results then it wouldn't be as serious as it is. However, he and his cohorts went waaaaaay beyond just 'questioning', hence the indictment. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacessit Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 3 hours ago, Hanaguma said: If he is found guilty, put him in prison. I have no problem with that. Just do it in time for the GOP to have a fair chance at selecting another nominee for the 2024 election. There are still knuckle-draggers who want to have him as President even if he is in prison. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, bignok said: Free speech. End of story. So Conspiracy as a crime is invalid? Planning a second Holocaust would be protected speech? How about people discussing a plan to murder you? If you had a recording, you wouldn't report it to the police? Edited August 2, 2023 by Danderman123 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 Posts and replies have been removed due to a claim of miss-quoting a member's quoted content. Troll posts have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bignok Posted August 2, 2023 Share Posted August 2, 2023 4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said: So Conspiracy as a crime is invalid? Planning a second Holocaust would be protected speech? How about people discussing a plan to murder you? If you had a recording, you wouldn't report it to the police? Who did he plan to murder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lacessit Posted August 2, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted August 2, 2023 35 minutes ago, bignok said: The BBC link has few details. I did first year Law. I see nothing in the link but fluff. You obviously spent most of that year asleep. I'd back Jack Smith's knowledge and experience of the law against yours. I'm reminded of the aphorism a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. 5 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now