PFIZER - Covid-Vax contract with South-Africa released by court-order

[peter zwart]

On 9/9/2023 at 2:02 PM, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

This whole thread is a lot of anti-vax nonsense by the same familiar crowd of anti-vaxers and conspiracy theorists here...

 

The contract conditions listed above are hardly surprising, given that Pfizer at the time, back early in the pandemic, was rolling out an entirely new vaccine on a rapid time schedule demanded by the world, even though it had already been widely tested in clinical trials.

 

But, what ultimately matters in all this is that the COVID vaccines have worked and have saved, and continue to save, cumulatively millions of lives by protecting people from COVID death and illness...

 

And, while there always is the possibility of side effects from any medication or vaccine, the past several years of worldwide COVID vaccine use and more than 13 BILLION doses administered worldwide have shown that serious side effects actually linked to the vaccines are very rare.

 

 

Source link

 

No Evidence Excess Deaths Linked to Vaccines, Contrary to Claims Online

Posted on April 17, 2023

"COVID-19 vaccines substantially reduce the risk of dying from COVID-19, and serious side effects are very rare. Excess deaths among working-age adults in 2021 and 2022 were driven by COVID-19 and other factors, not vaccination. Faulty logic underlies claims that vaccines caused mass disability and economic harm."

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/04/scicheck-no-evidence-excess-deaths-linked-to-vaccines-contrary-to-claims-online/

 

Benefits of Vaccination Outweigh the Risks

Serious side effects that could cause a long-term health problem are extremely rare following any vaccination, including COVID-19 vaccination. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the known and potential risks.

 

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/safety-of-vaccines.html

 

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Vaccines and vaccine safety

28 June 2023

 

"Like with any vaccine, some people will experience mild to moderate side effects after being vaccinated against COVID-19. This is a normal sign that the body is developing protection....

 

More serious or long-lasting side effects to COVID-19 vaccines are possible but extremely rare."

 

https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-vaccines

 

keep on dreaming

 

[Red Phoenix]

It took more than a year of legal battles before a judge ordered Pfizer and the South African government to release the content of the covid-vax contract.

Some AN-members might not be aware of a somewhat similar case in 2021.  More specifically, it did take an epic battle to get a court-order to release the 55.000 internal Pfizer-documents on which the FDA had based its decision to 'approve' the roll-out of the covid-vaccine.  While the FDA needed less than 3 months to approve the jabs based on these data, they requested that the release of the data would be postponed for 75 YEARS!   Luckily the judge did not agree with that preposterous request and ordered the piece-meal release of these documents. 

And from the moment these documents became available a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years.

You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.

Shocking is a grave understatement to describe the gaslighting of the public that these jabs were 'safe and effective' while both Pfizer and the FDA were well aware of the horrible facts from the clinical trials, reason they wanted to bury these data for 75 years...

[KhunLA]

10 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

It took more than a year of legal battles before a judge ordered Pfizer and the South African government to release the content of the covid-vax contract.

Some AN-members might not be aware of a somewhat similar case in 2021.  More specifically, it did take an epic battle to get a court-order to release the 55.000 internal Pfizer-documents on which the FDA had based its decision to 'approve' the roll-out of the covid-vaccine.  While the FDA needed less than 3 months to approve the jabs based on these data, they requested that the release of the data would be postponed for 75 YEARS!   Luckily the judge did not agree with that preposterous request and ordered the piece-meal release of these documents. 

And from the moment these documents became available a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years.

You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.

Shocking is a grave understatement to describe the gaslighting of the public that these jabs were 'safe and effective' while both Pfizer and the FDA were well aware of the horrible facts from the clinical trials, reason they wanted to bury these data for 75 years...

Big surprise ... none of those reports are making it into the MSM ????

[Eleftheros]

It's too bad that we are barred here from discussing the VAERS data (US) or Yellow Card (UK) data or EUDRAVigilance (EU), because one look at those figures is enough to curl your toes up when you think about getting injected with any of those Big Pharma products.

 

I understand (to an extent) the rationale for banning mention of these data, as they are self-reported rather than scientifically rigorous, but then again, people don't report adverse reactions to vaccines for fun, and most likely only a very small proportion of adverse reactions are reported.

 

The data is chilling, but inadmissible as evidence, as they say.

[KhunLA]

44 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

It's too bad that we are barred here from discussing the VAERS data (US) or Yellow Card (UK) data or EUDRAVigilance (EU)

Are we ?  As most of that is submitted by health professional.  And I believe investigated, as best as possible, I think.

 

I believe I've post some numbers in the past, although using; IMHO, suspected or possible always helps not getting things deleted.

 

Staggering numbers of suspected life changing side effects.

 

Although more disturbing numbers (aside from deaths & life changing disabilities possibly caused by vaccines) were from the CDC itself, early on, when they came out and adjusted their numbers of death due to covid vs with covid.  Scratching like 94% (?) of the deaths off the died from covid, and now simply 'suspected' of dying with covid.  As most early deaths, were not even tested or verified to have covid.  Simply have flu symptoms was enough to be listed as having covid.

 

That info is on the CDC site, deep in it, and I've posted it a few times.  The control of information on all aspects of this virus, before-during-after should disturb everyone with a thinking brain ... IMHO.

[rattlesnake]

53 minutes ago, Eleftheros said:

It's too bad that we are barred here from discussing the VAERS data (US) or Yellow Card (UK) data or EUDRAVigilance (EU), because one look at those figures is enough to curl your toes up when you think about getting injected with any of those Big Pharma products.

 

I understand (to an extent) the rationale for banning mention of these data, as they are self-reported rather than scientifically rigorous, but then again, people don't report adverse reactions to vaccines for fun, and most likely only a very small proportion of adverse reactions are reported.

 

The data is chilling, but inadmissible as evidence, as they say.

Saying it is inadmissible as evidence and refusing to take further action is nothing less than a cover-up.

 

VAERS is a tool designed for assessing the safety of vaccines. The data submitted is meant to be assessed and any causation (or lack thereof) with the vaccines is to be established. In any case, any significant variation in data is a red flag.

 

From the VAERS website:

 

The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can often quickly detect an early hint or warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. VAERS is one component of CDC's and FDA's multifaceted approach to monitoring safety after vaccines are licensed or authorized for use. […] VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also referred to as “safety signals.”

https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html

[rattlesnake]

12 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Are we ?  As most of that is submitted by health professional.  And I believe investigated, as best as possible, I think.

 

I believe I've post some numbers in the past, although using; IMHO, suspected or possible always helps not getting things deleted.

 

Staggering numbers of suspected life changing side effects.

 

Although more disturbing numbers (aside from deaths & life changing disabilities possibly caused by vaccines) were from the CDC itself, early on, when they came out and adjusted their numbers of death due to covid vs with covid.  Scratching like 94% (?) of the deaths off the died from covid, and now simply 'suspected' of dying with covid.  As most early deaths, were not even tested or verified to have covid.  Simply have flu symptoms was enough to be listed as having covid.

 

That info is on the CDC site, deep in it, and I've posted it a few times.  The control of information on all aspects of this virus, before-during-after should disturb everyone with a thinking brain ... IMHO.

They are supposed to be investigated as best as possible. In the case of the Covid jab, you would not believe the preposterous explanations I have been given by vaccination proponents over the past couple of years ("even my dog could file a VAERS report" etc.) to dismiss them.

[Eleftheros]

17 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

The control of information on all aspects of this virus, before-during-after should disturb everyone with a thinking brain

Well, that was essentially the point I was making - thinking brains are increasingly being banned everywhere across the online space, because there are too many people in positions of influence who think that pointing out reality is the same as hate speech.

 

They act from a combination of cowardice and narcissism, but there's no point in complaining about it, because that's the way things are right now.

 

And to be honest,  I don't think we've even reached the bottom of the pit yet.