Jump to content

‘A deadly societal force’: A Q&A with author Dr. Peter Hotez on the anti-science movement


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

You're, predictably, not quoting a credible news source above, but instead, a Letter to the Editor by....

 

"Dr. Tom Lankering

bio-energetic chiropractor"

 

Always good to get your vaccine and COVID info from chiropractors..... ????

 

Im fitter and stronger than you. Enough said. You get your info from drug reps.

  • Sad 4
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

And back on the topic of the thread:

 

From Hotez:

How did you see this play out during the COVID-19 pandemic?

"Some 200,000 Americans died because of anti-science aggression....

 

"When I went into the more conservative, rural areas of east Texas, essentially everyone I talked to had lost a loved one because they refused a COVID-19 vaccine. In the intensive-care unit, you saw some people deny COVID-19 existed, yet in their dying words feel remorse and advise their friends: ‘Don’t do what I did, get your COVID-19 immunization.’

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02981-z

 

There's an excellent article here that discusses covid and more generally the nature of viruses and vaccines with David Mina, an epidemiologist and virologist.

 

This is precisely the long transition from emergency to normality that the immunologist and epidemiologist Michael Mina has predicted since almost the beginning of the pandemic. Beginning in 2020, Mina took pains to describe Covid-19 as a “textbook virus,” with features that may have startled lay people — long Covid and post-acute sequelae, waning immunity and reinfection — but were, in his view, simply what could be expected from a new pathogen spreading through a global population with no immunity.

I spoke to Mina about what seeing Covid as a textbook virus tells us about the nature of the pandemic off-ramp — and about everything else we should’ve known about the disease from the outset.

https://archive.ph/JLwSH

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/05/opinion/covid-pandemic-michael-mina.html

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Keep Right said:

Another quack scientist trying to stifle any criticism of those who question scientific methods. 

Exactly how am I trying to stifle criticism? Do you believe that engaging in criticism is somehow an attempt to stifle criticicism?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bignok said:

Not sure what the point is. Average age back then wasnt high.

So human beings, unlike other animals, evolved to be nutritionally deficient? You really want to run with that? Domesticated animals tend to live a lot longer than their wild counterparts. Is their diet healthier? You don't think it possible that other factors might be the cause? It's ludicrous to claim that stone ages peoples  lived shorter lives because they didn't have access to magnesium tablets.

Edited by placeholder
  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

So human beings, unlike other animals, evolved to be nutritionally deficient? You really want to run with that? Domesticated animals tend to live a lot longer than their wild counterparts. Is their diet healthier? You don't think it possible that other factors might be the cause? It's ludicrous to claim that stone ages peoples  lived shorter lives because they didn't have access to magnesium tablets.

They have limited food options. Plus no treatments for snake bites or wounds. Limited shelter.

 

If you get a flu you can dose up on zinc and magnesium tablets now. Back then you couldnt.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuperSaiyan said:

It's solely because science went from loving to being questioned to being "The Science" made by blue/geen hair "professors" which aren't allowed to be questioned.

 

Btw, the guy in the picture looks like he should not be near children alone. Just my scientifically feeling.

And he looks pretty unhealthy. This guy obviously has no clue about health.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bignok said:

They have limited food options. 

 

 

False

Paleolithic Diet

It is clear that "Stone Age" humans did eat a variety of high-quality foods that were rich in nutrients and fiber. Compared to this diet, modern diets provide much less variety and are loaded with artificial sugars and salt.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482457/

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, placeholder said:

False

Paleolithic Diet

It is clear that "Stone Age" humans did eat a variety of high-quality foods that were rich in nutrients and fiber. Compared to this diet, modern diets provide much less variety and are loaded with artificial sugars and salt.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482457/

I find that hard to believe in many cases. Inland people didnt have much seafood and catching animals wasnt easy.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, placeholder said:

False

Paleolithic Diet

It is clear that "Stone Age" humans did eat a variety of high-quality foods that were rich in nutrients and fiber. Compared to this diet, modern diets provide much less variety and are loaded with artificial sugars and salt.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482457/

It's not just about diet. The introduction of clean water and sanitation systems was pivotal in increasing life expectancy.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...