Jump to content

Tourism fee fund to be fast-tracked after payouts to families in the Siam Paragon mass shooting


webfact

Recommended Posts

If it covers medical it’s a step in the right direction. Court of public opinion can’t moan about GoFundMe hard luck stories on one hand and then demonise this, which apparently has “medical” coverage.Let’s see what the “other benefits” are before it’s written off..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, bendejo said:

While living in Malaysia I decided to do a trip to Siem Reap (Angkor Wat, Cambodia) a few years back.  The visa on arrival, and the stuff I had to pay when leaving (can't recall the names, exit fee or airport tax etc) combined cost more than my round-trip Kuala Lumpur ticket. 

 

Today, it is impossible for your airport fees to exceed the total cost of your air ticket, unless you are taking Khmer souvenirs (eg wooden carvings) back home via checked in baggage.

Current status: 

Entry to Siem Reap. Yes, one has to pay for tourist visa on entry (30-41$US depending on method used to get it). 

Exit from Siem Reap is FREE. Personally, I have never had to pay on leaving Cambodia during many flights in the past 8 years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mokwit said:

They think they can do anything and foreigners will just stand for it. 

I think there’s some truth to that… but… I don’t think it’s perhaps as narrow as that.

 

Looking back to all the various “rough” patches thailand has been through.. we’ll be that civil unrest, C19, etc., by and large Thailand tourist appeal - it’s “draw” has remained quite high… again, that’s not to say that they can’t do any wrong — but more to say that the appeal to Thailand has remained fairly strong across the rough spots .

 

So, my guess is that even IF they go forward with this, I honestly don’t think it’s going to have a long term, sustained and materially negative impact on the nett tourist inflows… 

 

It’s kind of like the tourist appeal here is a semi-teflon exterior.. so… to that end, I can’t say it’s a totally bad bet .. I’ll bet it works out net positive for them.. yes, some will stay away… but the number of those that stay away, and (most importantly the economic value they represent) I’ll bet will be dwarfed by those who come and spend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remind me why I bother to pay my Non-B, work permit, tax, extensions, multiple re-entry, social security and Thai health cover again? Yes, it's only 300 Bhat, but it's just a grubby move and one more small thing to add to the pile of discontent and annoyance at airports.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, khunjeff said:

Right. The Thai son of wealthy Thai parents goes into a Thai shopping mall owned by Thai billionaires and kills some foreigners. To show how much it cares, the Thai government pays compensation to the victims using money coming only from foreign tourists.

 

Wait, what? ????

In the case of the Siam Paragon shooting that is not what happened.  There is no fund providing money coming from foreign tourists in existence at the moment.  You'd know that if you read the whole report.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Matthew2027 said:

A 'High Ranking' BIB explained a few years back regarding a fatal road accident involving a Foreigner... It's the foreigners FAULT, as if they where NOT in Thailand the accident would not have happened....

Garbage...complete myth dragged out now and again as being factual.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Gknrd said:

I think I will come in and retire there... I want to deposit 800K in the Thai bank, also I want to visit immigration every three months to let them know where I am. I also want to pay them extra so I can leave the country and come back in . I also want to go threw this process once a year so I can see them and just say hello, Pay them a few thousand extra.  Sounds like the nice thing to do...  Just a shout out to Thailand for making my retirement relaxing , simple and making me feel loved..

 

See ya soon... Thanks Thailand

 

Hm,...now, look at what you get for all this ! You stay in a sunny paradise like country, where almost everything is cheaper than in your country of origin (if you know the ways) ! And where you could get "companionship" (if you are interested in this) for a fraction of the cost in your country,....and great very affordable restaurants,...and so much more.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

What false assumptions are those?

You made the assumption you knew the accuracy in how the tax would be implemented.

Amazing how many crystal balls come out when a proposal appears in the media.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Because they cannot...the airline industry pushed back and told them to bugger off and collect it themselves when it was last proposed.

Not quite the case, countries add and change taxes regularly. The problem is that airlines cannot apply the tax selectively.

Even if they had come up with some arrangement it still left a problem with the land borders. The latest proposal would address both issues.

I suspect it may end up like the new motorway arrangement where you get so many days to pay.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Iamloki said:

2. 90 day check in... 3 minutes online - such a burden. (I think a pc works better than a telephone...)

Took me the whole morning, incl. four hours to/from Chaengwattana Immigration (and hours waiting there). All because my online report was declined as 'a new TM.30 was needed', which was bollo**s, as it was not... More and more fees incorporated into flight tickets, entry fees, taxes on any funds transferred to Thailand, overcharging, scams; I get it, not wanted here! No problem, Thailand, instead of 365 days a year, in the future, I may stay 2 weeks (in transit) only...

Edited by StayinThailand2much
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StayinThailand2much said:

All because my online report was declined as 'a new TM.30 was needed', which was bollo**s, as it was not...

How did Immigration deliver the message to you saying they wanted you to file an updated TM30.

 

And, what was your visa / extension / reentry permit situation in the months prior to your most recent 90-day report filing that got rejected?

 

Thanks!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

How did Immigration deliver the message to you saying they wanted you to file an updated TM30.

 

And, what was your visa / extension / reentry permit situation in the months prior to your most recent 90-day report filing that got rejected?

 

Thanks!

 

I filed my TM.47 online. (It was rejected by email.) It was my second TM.47. The first one was, as is required, also done in person.

Edited by StayinThailand2much
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

I filed my TM.47 online. (It was rejected by email.) It was my second TM.47. The first one was, as is required, also done in person.

I asked you about your visa / extension / re-entry permit status during the period leading up to this, because, normally, Immigration has NOT been requiring new TM30 filings for people on extensions with valid reentry permits, even if they travel abroad, so long as they're returning back home to the same address already on file for them.

 

But if you had changed your residence after your prior TM30, got a new visa or didn't have a reentry permit, then they likely WOULD be expecting you to file a new TM30.

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

But if you had changed your residence after your prior TM30, got a new visa or didn't have a reentry permit, then they likely WOULD be expecting you to file a new TM30.

My residence did not change. Why the online TM.47 system wanted me to file a new TM.30, I do not know. Besides, I live in a rental property, so it is neither my duty to file a TM.30, nor am I able to, as I do not have copies of the property docs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mike Lister said:

Yes, it's a Foreign Tourist Levy, nota general levy for anyone who travels!

 

New taxes on tourists have become common in many countries:

 

Barcelona taxes foreigners staying in tourist accommodation

Portugal charges foreign tourists 1 Euro per night

Austria adds 3.02% to foreign tourists bills

Belgium add about 7 Euro's per night to room bills

Bhutan charges foreigners a whopping USD 250 per day!

Bulgaria adds 1.50 Euro per night to bills

Caribbean islands, Croatia, Czech republic, 

France, Germany, Greece, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Malaysia

etc etc etc, all charge foreign tourists more.

 

https://www.euronews.com/travel/2023/09/11/tourist-taxes-all-of-the-countries-you-will-have-to-pay-to-enter-in-2022

 

 

but Thailand already changes a departure tax, which used to be paid when leaving but now included in your ticket. So they are now double taxing you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ericthai said:

but Thailand already changes a departure tax, which used to be paid when leaving but now included in your ticket. So they are now double taxing you!

Airports around the world charge a myriad of fees in different disguises, Departure Tax, Passenger Service Charge, Airport Tax, Arrivals Tax and doubtless others. So?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mike Lister said:

Airports around the world charge a myriad of fees in different disguises, Departure Tax, Passenger Service Charge, Airport Tax, Arrivals Tax and doubtless others. So?

yes, those are normal fees (landing, airport etc).  but as stated the Thai govt already has a separate charge as an exit fee (used to have to pay in cash before leaving), now they want to charge an entry fee too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ericthai said:

yes, those are normal fees (landing, airport etc).  but as stated the Thai govt already has a separate charge as an exit fee (used to have to pay in cash before leaving), now they want to charge an entry fee too.

Creative and innovative, no?  ????

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...