Donald Trump clashes repeatedly with judge in heated New York testimony

[Danderman123]

How much did Trump's testimony hurt him?

 

Just as importantly, the judge can ban Trump from doing business in New York. Possibly the judge could ban Trump just on the basis of his courtroom craziness.

[bendejo]

I think the judge's shut-him-up-or-I-will remark actually penetrated the hair spray and made an impact. 

When you see vid clips of him exiting the courtroom check out the facial expressions on the bailiffs, it looks like they're just waiting for an excuse to kick his azz, just like with any other criminal.

BTW, for those who may not be familiar with NYC, being known for buddying up to racist leaders will make you unpopular person there. 

[Tug]

Poor Donnie he must be so tired of all the winning or was that whining?

[Danderman123]

It looks like it is taking FOX News a long time to issue their Ivanka testimony talking points.

 

When they are available, the Trump cultists will post them here.

[bendejo]

18 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

It looks like it is taking FOX News a long time to issue their Ivanka testimony talking points.

When they are available, the Trump cultists will post them here.

Something to take note of with your attention to Fox Channel: they will deliberately leave things out.  A consequence of this is that people who only get their current events info from Fox likely will not believe it when hearing things for the first time from other sources. 

When the EJean verdict came in they got him for three out of four charges, the one for rape he walked on and that was the headline.  Maybe guilty for sexual assault was buried in the final paragraph.

 

Oh, and the GOP primary debates ran for a few hours and just finished in the past hour.

 

Edited November 9, 2023 by bendejo

[Skipalongcassidy]

2 hours ago, LosLobo said:

I did say 'possibly you are getting your President Roosevelts mixed up' and this was based on evidence of Theodore Roosevelt being bipolar and my failure to find any to support your claim.

 

Theodore & the Roosevelt Bipolar Inheritance - International Bipolar Foundation (ibpf.org)
 

Perhaps you can humour me and provide your evidence that Franklin Roosevelt was 'mentally crippled'?

 

As you know that on this forum facts need to be supported with evidence

And yes, I did say 'facts don't seem to be your friend' which was evident based on your previous posts and lack of evidence on this post.

1. Literally Rounded Up 120,000 Japanese Americans, and put them in Concentration Camps.  2. FDR Outlawed Private Ownership of Gold.  3. FDR was Pen Pals With Mussolini, Whom he Admired.  4. The Roosevelt Administration was Infested with Soviet-Russian Spies.  5. FDR Hated the Press and Suppressed Free Speech.  6. The Roosevelt administration seized and destroyed crops while Americans starved... It's in the history books that haven't been rewritten yet.  Pay more attention in class...

[LosLobo]

3 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

1. Literally Rounded Up 120,000 Japanese Americans, and put them in Concentration Camps.  2. FDR Outlawed Private Ownership of Gold.  3. FDR was Pen Pals With Mussolini, Whom he Admired.  4. The Roosevelt Administration was Infested with Soviet-Russian Spies.  5. FDR Hated the Press and Suppressed Free Speech.  6. The Roosevelt administration seized and destroyed crops while Americans starved... It's in the history books that haven't been rewritten yet.  Pay more attention in class...

Though facts (supported by evidence) may not be your friend.

 

It seems deflection and denial may be.

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

did you know that the prosecuting attorney that brought these charges is fully bought and paid for by George Soros who is an enemy of the United States... Let's go after ALL OF THEM. 

 

1 hour ago, candide said:

 

 

According to this article, she received $34,000 from the Soros family.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-judge-letitia-james-trial-george-soros-truth-social-republicans-1841020

 

@Skipalongcassidy

 

So, giving a candidate less than 1% of their campaign funding means that you have bought and paid for them?

 

Really?

 

Care to reconsider your comment?

 

Or, do you want to double down?

[Skipalongcassidy]

15 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Though facts (supported by evidence) may not be your friend.

 

It seems deflection and denial may be.

Typical libtard response... if you knew how to properly use search engines in this day and age it could help you make up for not paying attention in history class.

[Skipalongcassidy]

15 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

 

So, giving a candidate less than 1% of their campaign funding means that you have bought and paid for them?

 

Really?

 

Care to reconsider your comment?

 

Or, do you want to double down?

So your article is the end all information source... I have found many other articles that say it was anywhere from your 34k to over a million... When you use search engines for your information it is not ethical to only pick and choose which source has the honest truth... it's only right to read them all and state ranges of all the articles

[Chomper Higgot]

20 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

It's in the history books that haven't been rewritten yet.

 

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

if you knew how to properly use search engines in this day and age it could help you make up for not paying attention in history class.

So what books where using in history class?

[LosLobo]

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Typical libtard response... if you knew how to properly use search engines in this day and age it could help you make up for not paying attention in history class.

 

I suggest 'ad hominem' attacks in a discussion are generally a last resort of desperation and an admission from someone that they have no evidence to support their claims.

 

And, It is also a subliminal yield to a better argument and opponent. So, thanks for the acknowledgement!

 

I never attended a history class, that was not an academic subject in the 'A' stream, and I studied Latin instead.

 

Perhaps you should study the relevance of the 'Burden of Proof' and the importance of 'semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit'.

 

[Danderman123]

2 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

So your article is the end all information source... I have found many other articles that say it was anywhere from your 34k to over a million...

Please provide a link to an article stating that George Soros donated more than $34,000 to the Leticia James campaign.

 

Maybe you don't know this, but campaign finances are public information.  So, it's easy to find on the Google.

[candide]

7 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

So your article is the end all information source... I have found many other articles that say it was anywhere from your 34k to over a million... When you use search engines for your information it is not ethical to only pick and choose which source has the honest truth... it's only right to read them all and state ranges of all the articles

Which articles? Why don't you link them?

 

Even Fox News mentions only 34,000! 😅

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/soros-family-other-high-profile-megadonors-helped-fuel-political-career-new-york-ag-suing-trump

Edited November 10, 2023 by candide

[billd766]

On 11/7/2023 at 11:44 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

Didn't he already "lose" the case and this is only to decide how much to fine him?

I think he expects to get screwed over and is just using the opportunity to to stick it to the judge and his enemies out there.

I that is what he expects then he deserves everything he gets

 

Sensible, normal people would look abject** and apologetic in the hope of a lower penalty.

 

We are however talking about Trump.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=abject+meaning&sca_esv=581117380&sxsrf=AM9HkKmOrrvd5AvIQUnSSyG0Mr2mddf_3A%3A1699599242856&source=hp&ei=itNNZaXfMZKQoAS1v4DQAQ&iflsig=AO6bgOgAAAAAZU3hmvTqIRkFfZT3NnDRdcKuCWE37j1X&oq=abject&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IgZhYmplY3QqAggAMgwQIxiKBRgnGEYY-QEyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyChAAGIAEGBQYhwIyBRAAGIAEMgUQABiABEjJOFAAWMEhcAB4AJABAJgBcaAB7wSqAQMyLjS4AQHIAQD4AQHCAgcQIxiKBRgnwgIHEC4YigUYJ8ICBxAAGIoFGEPCAgsQLhiABBjHARivAQ&sclient=gws-wiz

 

** abject

 

abject meaning

2. (of a person or their behavior) completely without pride or dignity; self-abasing.
"an abject apology"

 

[thaibeachlovers]

12 hours ago, billd766 said:

Sensible, normal people would look abject** and apologetic in the hope of a lower penalty.

 

We are however talking about Trump.

Indeed, and why else do you think he has millions of supporters? If he behaved like a normal person in the presence of a mere judge he would likely lose almost all his support, as they want someone to poke a stick in the establishment's eye, not some wishy washy loser.

[FritsSikkink]

Trump is an absolute disgrace to the country:

 

Trump Admits Staff Has Seen Documents (msn.com)

 

What muppet is still believing that this clown is fit for presidency?

 

"before admitting that Mar-a-Lago employees "of course" have seen some of the classified documents he stored at the Florida resort."

 

 

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

21 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Trump is an absolute disgrace to the country:

 

Trump Admits Staff Has Seen Documents (msn.com)

 

What muppet is still believing that this clown is fit for presidency?

 

"before admitting that Mar-a-Lago employees "of course" have seen some of the classified documents he stored at the Florida resort."

 

 

 

 

If he's upsetting certain people he's doing a good job then. He wasn't elected to be nice to the opposition.

One hopes for him to win again so we can watch entertaining U Tube VDOs of snowflakes melting down, like last time.

[Georgealbert]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If he's upsetting certain people he's doing a good job then. He wasn't elected to be nice to the opposition.

One hopes for him to win again so we can watch entertaining U Tube VDOs of snowflakes melting down, like last time.

Another morning of your non stop Trump propaganda and support. But last week you posted you do not support him.

 

You post are so inconsistent, you really must be in on an alternative reality, or you are just a troll, or you need a cognitive function examination.

[heybruce]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

If he's upsetting certain people he's doing a good job then. He wasn't elected to be nice to the opposition.

One hopes for him to win again so we can watch entertaining U Tube VDOs of snowflakes melting down, like last time.

Now it comes out:  Trump is upsetting the US government by stealing, sharing, and in general mishandling classified documents and putting the country at risk.  Clearly you think Trump regards the US as the opposition.  That may be correct, he certainly regards rule of law as the opposition.

[billd766]

10 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed, and why else do you think he has millions of supporters? If he behaved like a normal person in the presence of a mere judge he would likely lose almost all his support, as they want someone to poke a stick in the establishment's eye, not some wishy washy loser.

TBH if it were me, I would rather not have that sort of support and lose anyway