Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

"the former prime minister is suffering from numerous illnesses." The issue isn't about the "numerous illnesses", but to what degree Thaksin's "suffering" is that it necessitates 6+ months of hospitalization. The proposed home-stay detention would render this question moot. So he's gotten the red carpet treatment, when is the parade?

Posted
1 hour ago, 1duckyboy said:

"the former prime minister is suffering from numerous illnesses." The issue isn't about the "numerous illnesses", but to what degree Thaksin's "suffering" is that it necessitates 6+ months of hospitalization. The proposed home-stay detention would render this question moot. So he's gotten the red carpet treatment, when is the parade?

Sure...

 

I'm guessing the home-stay detention also means (in his version of the world) that it's OK to do basic things that non prisoner detention folks can do; shopping - and who would approach him and his mafia gang and would he respond 'but be reasonably officer, it's Just 10 minutes'.  

Posted
3 hours ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

 

I am a permanent resident that owns businesses, works and pays taxes in Thailand, I have every right to comment. 

 

:thumbsup:

 

I'm also a PR (27 years), worked as a snr. organizational consultant for years and as an MBA lecturer for many years. 

Posted
21 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Never forget!

 

20110921_Thaksin-Supporters1.jpg

 

thailand02_wide-0382ddb22bd17e8311c06342

Of course, nothing to do with the fact that they had been slaughtered by the army the same day, included in a temple! 😃

  • Confused 1
Posted

Some posts with veiled speculative comments toward the Monarchy contravening our Forum Rules and the replies have been removed:

 

4. You will not express disrespect of the King of Thailand or any member of the Thai royal family whether living or deceased. You will not criticize the monarchy as an institution. Speculation, comments or discussion of either a political or personal nature are not allowed when discussing His Majesty The King of Thailand or the Thai royal family. You will not link to or discuss any website which contravenes this rule.

  • Like 1
Posted

???? 
 

I doubt he will get any support from the thousands of left behind family and friends of the 2500 extrajudicially executed after the «war on drugs» campaign. And Im pretty sure the ditto left behinds of the 84 killed in the Tak Bai incident also will be a bit questionous about this claim…

  • Thanks 2
Posted
51 minutes ago, Mangkhut said:

???? 
 

I doubt he will get any support from the thousands of left behind family and friends of the 2500 extrajudicially executed after the «war on drugs» campaign. And Im pretty sure the ditto left behinds of the 84 killed in the Tak Bai incident also will be a bit questionous about this claim…

Do you know who 'asked' Thaksin to do the war on drugs? (Don't tell who did it, just yes or no)?

(Hint: there have been no completed investigation about the war on drugs, even after Thaksin was ousted. It's been buried by the army and the Dems)

 

Do you know who took the initiative in the Tak Hai incident? (You can answer more explicitly to this one)

  • Confused 2
Posted
1 minute ago, OneMoreFarang said:

The red-shirt occupied Bangkok for months. They had huge barricades and war weapons. The authorities ask them to leave, many times, they didn't. The authorities provided free busses for them to go home, then didn't. 

And then finally, much too late, the army had to remove them all. The tomato police didn't do anything.

Nobody had to die. And I am sorry for the soldiers who lost their lives while doing their job. 

Nobody would have died if Abhisit had done like Yingluck. Both had their legimity contested (Abhisit hadn't even been elected PM in the previous elections). One dissolved the house, switched to caretaker mode, and organised elections. The other wanted to wait until after the new army chief would be appointed in September, and sent the troops. You know who became army chief, the same Prayut who was commanding the army in Bangkok when the 19 May slaughter happened. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 1/4/2024 at 2:51 PM, ikke1959 said:

A peacemaker and praised?? for not being in jail? for divide the Thai society more than ever??

 

A divided society would suit the powers that be very nicely, I'd have thought...

Posted
On 1/4/2024 at 7:54 AM, WhatMeWorry said:

I wonder how much was in this guy's brown envelope. Thailand is such a pathetically corrupt country.

Same same - have a read up on the post office scandal in the uk 

Posted
1 hour ago, candide said:

Nobody would have died if Abhisit had done like Yingluck. Both had their legimity contested (Abhisit hadn't even been elected PM in the previous elections). One dissolved the house, switched to caretaker mode, and organised elections. The other wanted to wait until after the new army chief would be appointed in September, and sent the troops. You know who became army chief, the same Prayut who was commanding the army in Bangkok when the 19 May slaughter happened. 

For those who approved Abhisit's behaviour in 2010, and are now complaining about the fate imposed to MFP, a reminder of the sequence of events:

Abhisit refuses to dissolve house before nomination of army chief => Prayut army chief => coup => Junta constitution => Senators elect PM => MFP PM rejected

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Mangkhut said:

???? 
 

I doubt he will get any support from the thousands of left behind family and friends of the 2500 extrajudicially executed after the «war on drugs» campaign. And Im pretty sure the ditto left behinds of the 84 killed in the Tak Bai incident also will be a bit questionous about this claim…

Deplorable though the war on drugs was, particularly its brutal implementation, there is reason to believe that very many of the murdered 2500 were criminally involved in the drug trade.None of them deserved to die in this way but it's striking how some restrict their concern to the alleged drug dealers' families and friends (many of whom were criminals though many were not) but there never seems to be any mention or concern for the hundreds of thousands of Thais whose lives have been blighted or ended by this disgusting trade.It probably explains why most Thais of all classes supported the campaign.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, George FmplesdaCosteedback said:

What an utter load of nonsense. Ask the families and friends of The 2,500 from Thaksin's "war on drugs" what they think of this dreadful crawling to man who should have been in jail for life from the day after the coup.

 

51 minutes ago, jayboy said:

Deplorable though the war on drugs was, particularly its brutal implementation, there is reason to believe that very many of the murdered 2500 were criminally involved in the drug trade.None of them deserved to die in this way but it's striking how some restrict their concern to the alleged drug dealers' families and friends (many of whom were criminals though many were not) but there never seems to be any mention or concern for the hundreds of thousands of Thais whose lives have been blighted or ended by this disgusting trade.It probably explains why most Thais of all classes supported the campaign.

It should have been investigated and all the people responsible for it convicted!

Any idea why the army and the Dems buried the investigation, while Thaksin was already ousted?

Posted
15 hours ago, Red Forever said:

The only division around this issue is that the vast majority of Thais are indifferent to the ongoing circus.

The HiSo of Bangkok and the fulminating farang on here need their red meat in order to satiate their hatred for an old man who they have never met and who has had no negative impact on their lives.

 

Red Forever

Is that you Takki, from the VIP section?

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Ben Zioner said:

Do uou know who started those fires? I'd look first at those who gained from them.

I think I do, but would welcome some information.  Would it really be unsafe for you to add more?

Posted
13 hours ago, candide said:

Do you know who 'asked' Thaksin to do the war on drugs? (Don't tell who did it, just yes or no)?

(Hint: there have been no completed investigation about the war on drugs, even after Thaksin was ousted. It's been buried by the army and the Dems)

 

Do you know who took the initiative in the Tak Hai incident? (You can answer more explicitly to this one)

Taksin was prime minister when both of these things took place. He was the leader of the country, nothing was initiated unless Thaksin approved it….

 

In a democratic country he would have been impeached and convicted for such atrocities!

Instead he was prosecuted for some economical stuff…

  • Agree 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Mangkhut said:

Taksin was prime minister when both of these things took place. He was the leader of the country, nothing was initiated unless Thaksin approved it….

 

In a democratic country he would have been impeached and convicted for such atrocities!

Instead he was prosecuted for some economical stuff…

About the second point: sure, we all know the army always obeys the government in this country! 😁

 

About the first one: you are right. In a democratic country, there would have been an investigation and people responsible for It would have been convicted. Why did the army and the Dems bury the case, as it would have been the ideal occasion to nail Thaksin?

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
12 hours ago, candide said:

About the second point: sure, we all know the army always obeys the government in this country! 😁

 

About the first one: you are right. In a democratic country, there would have been an investigation and people responsible for It would have been convicted. Why did the army and the Dems bury the case, as it would have been the ideal occasion to nail Thaksin?

Then he would rise again 

Posted

Justice Minister, laughable some of the titles they give themselves, and the lies and stories they tell are amazing

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...