Jump to content
All visa questions and fresh Immigration updates here ×

Judge in Trump case in Georgia sets hearing over Fani Willis conflict-of-interest claims

stats

By stats
in World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Posted
Posted

This woman clearly has no ethics. What a disgrace. No surprise she is a Democrat. The hypocrisy of these people is astounding. 

 

I wonder how long before she plays the race card - oh... wait a minute...

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Danderman123
Danderman123

He was separated when they allegedly hooked up.   He's got a reasonable resume for the job, and she broke no laws hiring him.    So far, it's distasteful, but not a showstopper.

impulse
impulse

She was the beneficiary of the people's money that she arranged to pay him.   Big showstopper.    Not only that, it goes to her ethics, and what other ethical tenets she'd be willi

Hanaguma
Hanaguma

OK. So she was banging a married guy. Threw him a lucrative job contract which he was really not qualified to do. He made more than half a million bucks. Took her on trips etc.  Nothing to see here...

Posted Images

impulse Star Member

impulse

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Was that rant not hilarious? 

 

I was almost expecting a bolt of lightning.  

 

Of course, at the time the receipts weren't in about pay scale discrepancies, so the rant gets better and better each time new info is revealed and exposes more fibs.

 

BTW, I can't post a link, but you may want to Google "Georgia state senate special committee "  Case LC 47 2726  It could get interesting in about a week.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

It is the mechanics of the case that are at risk. So now there are motions and response to motions and hearings that would be totally unnecessary except for the possible violations of state law that are now being discussed.

‘Mechanics of the case’?

 

The divorce court judge will examine if Willis has an argument to negate the subpoena that calls for her testimony, Willis has made compelling arguments to court in her filing.

 

The criminal court judge will examine if the allegations have any legal bearing on the criminal case and if they present evidence of the defendant’s rights having been infringed. The accuser has made a very weak argument with zero grounds or evidence of his rights to a fair trial having been infringed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerrymahoney Platinum Member

jerrymahoney

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

‘Mechanics of the case’?

 

The divorce court judge will examine if Willis has an argument to negate the subpoena that calls for her testimony, Willis has made compelling arguments to court in her filing.

 

The criminal court judge will examine if the allegations have any legal bearing on the criminal case and if they present evidence of the defendant’s rights having been infringed. The accuser has made a very weak argument with zero grounds or evidence of his rights to a fair trial having been infringed.

 

 

You shoulda stuck with:

 

So do you want to address the matter of others spending their wages as they see fit? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

‘Mechanics of the case’?

 

The divorce court judge will examine if Willis has an argument to negate the subpoena that calls for her testimony, Willis has made compelling arguments to court in her filing.

 

The criminal court judge will examine if the allegations have any legal bearing on the criminal case and if they present evidence of the defendant’s rights having been infringed. The accuser has made a very weak argument with zero grounds or evidence of his rights to a fair trial having been infringed.

 

 

Do you have anything that supports your ridiculous claims? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerrymahoney Platinum Member

jerrymahoney

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Feel free to counter the argument I made.

or not to. Hearing in the big case (not the divorce case)is FEB 15.

 

And Ms. Willis's response to the Roman Motion is due FEB 2.

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

or not to. Hearing in the big case (not the divorce case)is FEB 15.

 

And Ms. Willis's response to the Roman Motion is due FEB 2.


You are overlooking a detail in Willis’ filing in the divorce case.

 

Her legal team have laid out the basis of criminal conspiracy on the part of the divorcing couple.

 

I look forward to her filing on Feb 2, I expect to hear more of this ‘criminal conspiracy’, you should too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Yellowtail Star Member

Yellowtail

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:


You are overlooking a detail in Willis’ filing in the divorce case.

 

Her legal team have laid out the basis of criminal conspiracy on the part of the divorcing couple.

 

I look forward to her filing on Feb 2, I expect to hear more of this ‘criminal conspiracy’, you should too.

So, her boyfriend is conspiring against her? 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
impulse Star Member

impulse

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Well that clears up who’s money it was that was being spent.

 

So that means she's guilty of conflict of interest and he's stealing his ex wife's money.

 

What a team...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
impulse Star Member

impulse

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

What trump gets out of it is delay especially if there is mandate for a change in the prosecution team.

 

More than that...  All the Trumpers who were coerced into pleading guilty and testifying in return for leniency, may not have to testify.  Immediately after the judge rules the guy can't get a fair trial with her at the helm, their lawyers will be filing appeals.  Then, the lawsuits will start.

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ozimoron Star Member

ozimoron

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, impulse said:

 

More than that...  All the Trumpers who were coerced into pleading guilty and testifying in return for leniency, may not have to testify.  Immediately after the judge rules the guy can't get a fair trial with her at the helm, their lawyers will be filing appeals.  Then, the lawsuits will start.

 

 

What she has done is neither illegal nor a conflict of interest. Any disciplinary action against her will not affect the trial other than a short delay at best.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dhupverg Senior Member

dhupverg

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

 

What she has done is neither illegal nor a conflict of interest. Any disciplinary action against her will not affect the trial other than a short delay at best.

Hiring a guy you are blowing may not be illegal, but certainly unethical.  

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ozimoron Star Member

ozimoron

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, dhupverg said:

Hiring a guy you are blowing may not be illegal, but certainly unethical.  

 

Sure, but my point is just don't think this is a godsend for Trump unless what I've been reading is  wildly wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Purdey Platinum Member

Purdey

Posted
Posted

I had assumed that in America, like many other places, that if a judge were recused, fired or set aside, they would simply get another judge? Presumably, all documents would be handed in to the new judge and the case would continue based on facts and law. What bearing would it have on the Trump case except timing?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerrymahoney Platinum Member

jerrymahoney

Posted
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

What she has done is neither illegal nor a conflict of interest. Any disciplinary action against her will not affect the trial other than a short delay at best.

Fulton official grills DA Fani Willis over alleged relationship
Commissioner Bob Ellis is asking Willis questions over her relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who assisted in her Donald Trump investigation.


Published: Jan. 22, 2024 at 10:11 PM GMT+7|Updated: 15 hours ago
ATLANTA, Ga. (Atlanta News First) - A Fulton County commissioner has become the latest public official to demand information from embattled District Attorney Fani Willis about her relationship to the special prosecutor she hired to help investigate former President Donald Trump.

 

On Friday, Commissioner Bob Ellis sent a letter to Willis over allegations she has a personal relationship with Nathan Wade, who has been paid almost $1 million in taxpayer funds for his services in Willis’ investigation of the nation’s 45th president. Newly released bank statements show Willis and Wade took vacations together, and Wade is alleged to have used part of his salary from the district attorney’s office to travel with Willis.

 

“As the chair of the Fulton County audit committee, I must reasonably inquire about allegations that contained in recent court filing asserting that you misused County funds and accepted valuable gifts and personal benefits from a contractor/recipient of County funds,” Ellis wrote.

 

“These allegations involve your decision to appoint Nathan Wade as a special prosecutor in the matter in which former President Trump is a co-defendant,” the letter said. “Mr. Wade is alleged to (1) lack relevant prosecutorial experience in a case of this type and complexity, (2) have paid for your portion of multiple instances of joint leisure travel, and (3) be in a romantic relationship with you that was not disclosed to the court or to the parties in this case.”

 

https://www.atlantanewsfirst.com/2024/01/22/fulton-official-grills-da-fani-willis-over-alleged-relationship/

 

2024-01-23_12h00_33.png.e7953c0bf0b9dd96ebb27463c7e02115.png

Edited by jerrymahoney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...