Trump says he ‘wouldn’t protect’ Prince Harry if he’s reelected

[ozimoron]

1 minute ago, Dolf said:

Terrorism how dramatic. Look at the middle east terrorism.

 

My post was about US domestic terrorism. Trump is up to his neck in trying to provoke it, with some degree of success. Your post is an off topic deflection. This is about Trump's attempt to provoke an assassination of a foreign prince if he continues to live in the US and Trump becomes president. Telegraphing to the world that the US secret service will be nowhere to be seen, go right ahead.

[Roo Island]

2 minutes ago, Dolf said:

Terrorism how dramatic. Look at the middle east terrorism.

One of the biggest problems in the US. Domestic terrorists.

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/12/us/politics/domestic-terror-white-supremacists.html

 

Top law enforcement officials say the biggest domestic terror threat comes from white supremacists.

[Dolf]

2 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

My post was about US domestic terrorism. Trump is up to his neck in trying to provoke it, with some degree of success. Your post is an off topic deflection. This is about Trump's attempt to provoke an assassination of a foreign prince if he continues to live in the US and Trump becomes president. Telegraphing to the world that the US secret service will be nowhere to be seen, go right ahead.

Your post is off topic nonsense. The topic is about Trump not paying for Harry's lifestyle.

 

Then you made wild terrorist comments.

 

Lost the plot.

[JonnyF]

Another loss for Harry.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/28/prince-harry-loses-high-court-challenge-to-personal-security-downgrade

 

Seems like nobody wants to give him something for nothing. Biting the hand that feeds him appears to have been a bad idea. Who knew?

 

He must rue the day he met that Markle woman. 

[ozimoron]

1 minute ago, Dolf said:

Your post is off topic nonsense. The topic is about Trump not paying for Harry's lifestyle.

 

Then you made wild terrorist comments.

 

Lost the plot.

 

No, it isn't it's an announcement that he would not PROTECT Harry nothing about paying for his lifestyle. You're such a troll.

[Dolf]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

Another loss for Harry.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/28/prince-harry-loses-high-court-challenge-to-personal-security-downgrade

 

Seems like nobody wants to give him something for nothing. Biting the hand that feeds him appears to have been a bad idea. Who knew?

 

He must rue the day he met that Markle woman. 

He bit the hand that feeds him.

[Dolf]

Just now, ozimoron said:

 

No, it isn't it's an announcement that he would not PROTECT Harry nothing about paying for his lifestyle. You're such a troll.

Only trolls play the troll card. Topic has nothing to do with terrorism.

[transam]

10 hours ago, candide said:

Rather something like: "How low has our colony sunk!" 😀

I doubt that very much, one only has to look at presidency contenders across the pond......😁

[ozimoron]

Just now, Dolf said:

Only trolls play the troll card. Topic has nothing to do with terrorism.

 

Of course it does. Why would any sane politician announce to the world that he won't protect a public figure who clearly has a target on his back by MAGA nut cases. If it was really about the money then he would do it and shut up about it. His words now compel the US to provide security for Harry. Trump just made it so.

[thaibeachlovers]

19 hours ago, Emdog said:

Trump has such respect for royal family (not!). Recall his visit to the Queen: not walking beside her, but doing his typical strut in front of her.... Trump has class: lowest of low

LOL. America fought a war not to respect English royalty. Seems some think that means nothing and an American president should be grovelling in front of them.

I stopped standing up in cinemas when they played the bit with the Queen where we were supposed to show our servitude to her, long before they stopped playing it because no one was.

[ozimoron]

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. America fought a war not to respect English royalty. Seems some think that means nothing and an American president should be grovelling in front of them.

I stopped standing up in cinemas when they played the bit with the Queen where we were supposed to show our servitude to her, long before they stopped playing it because no one was.

 

You think it's a good look when Trump tramples international protocol into the mud? I'm a republican to the core but decency is decency and Trump doesn't have it. If he wants to make a statement, Washington was the place to do it, not London. Anyway, stay on topic, this is about Harry.

[OneMoreFarang]

I don't like Trump. But to be fair, sometimes he has good ideas. 

[ozimoron]

Just now, OneMoreFarang said:

I don't like Trump. But to be fair, sometimes he has good ideas. 

 

On what planet is inviting the assassination of a public figure a good idea?

[JonnyF]

8 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Of course it does. Why would any sane politician announce to the world that he won't protect a public figure who clearly has a target on his back by MAGA nut cases. If it was really about the money then he would do it and shut up about it. His words now compel the US to provide security for Harry. Trump just made it so.

 

If Harry has a target on his back it will most likely be The Taliban after he bragged about his kill count in his revengeful book of fiction, Spare. 

 

Trump has no responsibility to protect The Markles any more than he has a duty to protect Hugh Grant.

 

You can't quite your job and expect to keep the benefits. If Harry was a bit smarter he would have known that. 

[Social Media]

Topic Update: Prince Harry loses High Court challenge over UK security levels

 

The Duke of Sussex has lost a High Court challenge against the government over his security when in the UK. 

 

The judge ruled there had been no unlawfulness in the decision-making or anything that could be called irrational in the changes to Prince Harry's security in February 2020 - and even if there had been any "procedural unfairness" it would not have changed the outcome.

 

Much of the hearing had been heard in private for security reasons - and parts of the ruling were redacted - but the ruling found that the approach of having a "bespoke" arrangement for Prince Harry, rather than the same as working royals, was "legally sound".

 

Source

 

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

 

On what planet is inviting the assassination of a public figure a good idea?

 

He can hire private security if he thinks his comments about killing Taliban members will come back to bite him.

 

Why should Trump provide it?

 

[JonnyF]

Just now, Social Media said:

Much of the hearing had been heard in private for security reasons - and parts of the ruling were redacted - but the ruling found that the approach of having a "bespoke" arrangement for Prince Harry, rather than the same as working royals, was "legally sound".

 

The ruling is correct. He can have protection when on royal duty (which he chose to give up).

 

No need to provide it while he swans around the world on private jets merching his imagined victimhood. Get your own wallet out and hire some goons, same as the Kardashians do. 

[Dolf]

4 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

He must rue the day he met that Markle woman. 

He said he wanted a quiet life then goes on Oprah.

[Dolf]

19 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Of course it does. Why would any sane politician announce to the world that he won't protect a public figure who clearly has a target on his back by MAGA nut cases. If it was really about the money then he would do it and shut up about it. His words now compel the US to provide security for Harry. Trump just made it so.

The British Royal family did the same

[Dolf]

8 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

On what planet is inviting the assassination of a public figure a good idea?

What dramatic nonsense. TDS. 

[Dolf]

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

The ruling is correct. He can have protection when on royal duty (which he chose to give up).

 

No need to provide it while he swans around the world on private jets merching his imagined victimhood. Get your own wallet out and hire some goons, same as the Kardashians do. 

Ben Shapiro spends 2 million a year on security.

[Lacessit]

Seems to me Trump will say anything to get himself another headline and more attention, however irrelevant it may be.

 

 

 

 

[ozimoron]

10 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

If Harry has a target on his back it will most likely be The Taliban after he bragged about his kill count in his revengeful book of fiction, Spare. 

 

Trump has no responsibility to protect The Markles any more than he has a duty to protect Hugh Grant.

 

You can't quite your job and expect to keep the benefits. If Harry was a bit smarter he would have known that. 

 

The taliban terrorists love Trump. He released 5,000 of them from prison.

 

Harry never had a job, he was dealt a bad hand by birth.

[Dolf]

15 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I don't like Trump. But to be fair, sometimes he has good ideas. 

Lots of them. Spends money on Americans not wars or celebrities.

[ozimoron]

4 minutes ago, Dolf said:

Lots of them. Spends money on Americans not wars or celebrities.

 

Yep, lots of Americans made  good coin making those gold sneakers. Right?

[OneMoreFarang]

22 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

If Harry was a bit smarter he would have known that. 

He probably asked his beloved wife... 

[ozimoron]

3 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

He probably asked his beloved wife... 

 

Guilty of being black while married to a white prince. Nothing else.

[Dolf]

23 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Guilty of being black while married to a white prince. Nothing else.

She looks light brown to me. Doesn't talk to her father and is full of herself like Harry

[JonnyF]

23 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

 

Guilty of being black while married to a white prince. Nothing else.

 

If Meghan Markle is black then that's a pretty serious case of cultural appropriation.

 

 

Seriously though, nobody cares that she is mixed race. They care that she is a nasty piece of work who not content with ripping apart her own family, now tries to do the same with Harry's. 

[Dolf]

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

If Meghan Markle is black then that's a pretty serious case of cultural appropriation.

 

 

Seriously though, nobody cares that she is mixed race. They care that she is a nasty piece of work who not content with ripping apart her own family, now tries to do the same with Harry's. 

I'm darker than her. Where's my princess?