Chomper Higgot Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 42 minutes ago, morrobay said: Here is admission by one of these racist jurors saying most of them knew he was guilty.But they aquitted oj for payback in Rodney king case. * Oh and you are calling that detective a racist . From what the racist lawyers said?? I can't believe some of "you people"https://www.pinkvilla.com/sports/when-a-juror-from-oj-simpson-case-confessed-the-verdict-was-payback-for-rodney-king-case-1295002 Pinkvilla! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said: I thought it was because the glove did not fit, so the jury had to acquit. And here is another one of these people making these trite one liners from a distance. That don't have the facts/ circumstances: The glove was dried and stiff from the dried blood and oj was wearing rubber gloves while making big act trying to put it on. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 3 minutes ago, impulse said: Given the racially charged atmosphere of the time (especially in So Cal), I certainly wouldn't have wanted to be on that jury and exposed myself to retribution had there been a guilty verdict, or even a hung jury. There would have been entire city blocks burned down had he been convicted. Just like the Rodney King riots and the Summer of Love (and mostly peaceful city burnings). As I recall, they had whittled it down to Bigfoot, space aliens, or OJ did it... Apparently, the jury figured that was enough reasonable doubt. It may have been Bigfoot or aliens... Laden with baseless assertions. Hardly a surprise given the source. But let’s put a pin in this idea of jurors being threatened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 1 minute ago, morrobay said: And here is another one of these people making these trite one liners from a distance. That don't have the facts/ circumstances: The glove was dried and stiff from the dried blood and oj was wearing rubber gloves while making big act trying to put it on. I saw him trying to put it on and I disagree with you. It definitely looked too small to me. They'd have to be very thick rubber gloves to make a difference, like so thick the opposition lawyers would have said something about it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 (edited) 10 minutes ago, impulse said: Given the racially charged atmosphere of the time (especially in So Cal), I certainly wouldn't have wanted to be on that jury and exposed myself to retribution had there been a guilty verdict, or even a hung jury. There would have been entire city blocks burned down had he been convicted. Just like the Rodney King riots and the Summer of Love (and mostly peaceful city burnings). As I recall, they had whittled it down to Bigfoot, space aliens, or OJ did it... Apparently, the jury figured that was enough reasonable doubt. It may have been Bigfoot or aliens... Well maybe you are right about that rioting. So that is what martial law is for. Edited April 14 by morrobay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Carter icp Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 9 minutes ago, impulse said: As I recall, they had whittled it down to Bigfoot, space aliens, or OJ did it... Apparently, the jury figured that was enough reasonable doubt. It may have been Bigfoot or aliens... O.J's Son was also on that list . He was the one who could wear that small glove . O.J didn't want to snitch on his Son Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impulse Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said: O.J's Son was also on that list . He was the one who could wear that small glove . O.J didn't want to snitch on his Son Hell, it could have been me. I was living in Huntington Beach at the time. Anyone who's ever tried to put on a dried leather golf glove knows that it's not going to fit unless you either soak it again, or force it on. They're meant to be snug. So are leather driving gloves. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 9 minutes ago, morrobay said: And here is another one of these people making these trite one liners from a distance. That don't have the facts/ circumstances: The glove was dried and stiff from the dried blood and oj was wearing rubber gloves while making big act trying to put it on. You know the great thing about U Tube is that we can see for ourselves. Stiff from dried blood? Really? Those rubber gloves are not thick. I used them every work day for over 2 decades to know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 2 minutes ago, impulse said: Anyone who's ever tried to put on a dried leather golf glove knows that it's not going to fit unless you either soak it again, or force it on. They're meant to be snug. So are leather driving gloves. LOL. I suggest you watch the VDO I posted. The gloves look as stiff as my <deleted> these days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 I just want to say that I don't have an opinion as to whether OJ did it or not, but the entire furore seems based on him being a black man. Had he been a white man, would there have been the same verdict? I'm aware of too many innocent people being falsely convicted to have much faith in the judicial system getting it right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 14 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: You know the great thing about U Tube is that we can see for ourselves. Stiff from dried blood? Really? Those rubber gloves are not thick. I used them every work day for over 2 decades to know. To the person that gave that post a laugh, I wonder what goes through your mind when you put a laugh emoji on something that is nothing to do with me. I doubt you are going to explain so I'll give you an emoji myself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impulse Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 (edited) 24 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: LOL. I suggest you watch the VDO I posted. The gloves look as stiff as my <deleted> these days. YouTube's blocked here, but I watched the original video yesterday. He didn't even make an effort to get the glove on. And while the latex gloves may be thin, they completely change the coefficient of friction, especially dry. Had the prosecution been on the ball, they would have found a new pair of gloves of the same model and size and had him try to put one on, without the latex. My experience with golf gloves and driving gloves... I'd have gotten that glove on. May have taken a soak or just more effort. But I'd have done it to save $10-15 on a new glove. (Of course, being evidence, I can understand why they wouldn't have allowed soaking the glove, and being on trial for his life, I can understand why his efforts weren't sincere) What I don't understand is anyone not seeing through the charade. Edited April 14 by impulse 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rexpotter Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Why did she marry him? Not possibly for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyF Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Good riddance to bad rubbish. Acquitted by a mostly black jury looking for revenge for Rodney King. The politics of hate and payback later promoted by BLM. 2 sides of the same coin. Fortunately the brutal murder he committed still effectively ruined his life. Forever remembered as a lying brutal killer. Quite the legacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 46 minutes ago, JonnyF said: Good riddance to bad rubbish. Acquitted by a mostly black jury looking for revenge for Rodney King. The politics of hate and payback later promoted by BLM. 2 sides of the same coin. Fortunately the brutal murder he committed still effectively ruined his life. Forever remembered as a lying brutal killer. Quite the legacy. Do you have any evidence that the Jury were looking for revenge? Or is this another of your ill-informed baseless allegations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 3 hours ago, rexpotter said: Why did she marry him? Not possibly for money. Could be. Their house on Victoria beach,Laguna was just about next to my grandparents house. Ive seen them walking up to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Victoria Beach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john donson Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 so many people get harmed or killed, so they bleed you dry if you 'had' some money... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 (edited) 16 minutes ago, john donson said: so many people get harmed or killed, so they bleed you dry if you 'had' some money.. It's really high time to stick a fork in this one. Like these off the wall comments - enough is enough Edited April 14 by morrobay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyF Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: Do you have any evidence that the Jury were looking for revenge? Or is this another of your ill-informed baseless allegations? One of them recently admitted it. Cant be bothered to find the link. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyF Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: Do you have any evidence that the Jury were looking for revenge? Or is this another of your ill-informed baseless allegations? https://www.essence.com/news/oj-simpson-not-guilty-verdict-payback-rodney-king/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: Do you have any evidence that the Jury were looking for revenge? Or is this another of your ill-informed baseless allegations? https://www.thewrap.com/oj-simpson-juror-not-guilty-verdict-was-payback-for-rodney-king/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 Knowingly returning a false verdict , not guilty in a criminal case. Is not punishable. It's called jury nullification. So that results in some laws being unenforceable. Another case for professional jurors https://fija.org/library-and-resources/library/jury-nullification-faq/what-is-jury-nullification.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 14 Share Posted April 14 20 hours ago, impulse said: He didn't even make an effort to get the glove on. I guess we have to differ on that. He gave it a good try IMO. I guess you don't want to admit that there is any doubt in the case, but I'm with the jury. If in doubt do not convict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 20 hours ago, impulse said: YouTube's blocked here, but I watched the original video yesterday. He didn't even make an effort to get the glove on. And while the latex gloves may be thin, they completely change the coefficient of friction, especially dry. Had the prosecution been on the ball, they would have found a new pair of gloves of the same model and size and had him try to put one on, without the latex. My experience with golf gloves and driving gloves... I'd have gotten that glove on. May have taken a soak or just more effort. But I'd have done it to save $10-15 on a new glove. (Of course, being evidence, I can understand why they wouldn't have allowed soaking the glove, and being on trial for his life, I can understand why his efforts weren't sincere) What I don't understand is anyone not seeing through the charade. At least you are not trying to tell us that the glove was dry and stiff from dried blood. Ain't VDOs great? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrobay Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 26 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: At least you are not trying to tell us that the glove was dry and stiff from dried blood. Ain't VDOs great Enough is enough with this ongoing nonsense. The jurors already said they believe oj did it. Re the glove : Link And Adios ! https://people.com/oj-simpson-everything-to-know-about-infamous-glove-trial-8630341 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impulse Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said: At least you are not trying to tell us that the glove was dry and stiff from dried blood. Ain't VDOs great? I've owned quite a few leather golf gloves and a few pairs of leather driving gloves. Any time I put one up for awhile, they dry out and shrink and putting them back on requires re-hydrating them to get them back up to size. That's the nature of the leather. I saw the videos. I could have gotten the glove on. I've done it hundreds of times with gloves that shrank even more. But he obviously didn't want to... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 5 minutes ago, impulse said: I've owned quite a few leather golf gloves and a few pairs of leather driving gloves. Any time I put one up for awhile, they dry out and shrink and putting them back on requires re-hydrating them to get them back up to size. That's the nature of the leather. I saw the videos. I could have gotten the glove on. I've done it hundreds of times with gloves that shrank even more. But he obviously didn't want to... That doesn’t negate reasonable doubt. The glove performance introduced reasonable doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyF Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: That doesn’t negate reasonable doubt. The glove performance introduced reasonable doubt. Why am I not surprised you would side with OJ being found not guilty for a crime he clearly committed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonnyF Posted April 15 Share Posted April 15 2 hours ago, impulse said: I've owned quite a few leather golf gloves and a few pairs of leather driving gloves. Any time I put one up for awhile, they dry out and shrink and putting them back on requires re-hydrating them to get them back up to size. That's the nature of the leather. I saw the videos. I could have gotten the glove on. I've done it hundreds of times with gloves that shrank even more. But he obviously didn't want to... Totally agree. Same with motorcycle gloves/leathers. He could also have put on weight between the crime and the trial. Either way he was guilty as sin and escaped justice due to the demographics of the jury which was deliberately selected for that purpose. A shameful example of the American legal system and a terrible example of a human being. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now