Jump to content

Takeaways from the Trump hush money trial: Opening statements and the first witness


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump's felony charges hinge on there being an underlying crime. I cited the statute for the underlying crime.

That the statute can proven as the "other crime" is your opinion

 

The 34 Counts against Trump are all  the same statute which includes:

 

The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017, with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof, ...

 

 https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Edited by jerrymahoney
  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, earlinclaifornia said:

The Daily Wire does not claim to be without bias. We’re opinionated, we’re noisy, and we’re having a good time.

And the Daily Wire was just a rehash of the NYTimes article which is paywall.

Posted
On 4/23/2024 at 8:48 AM, Skipalongcassidy said:

For being extremely verbose you sure don't have much of value to say... 

 

Agree!  So much wasted text that says nothing.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I don't think it will be difficult for the Prosecution to prove there was an underlying crime. David Pecker is testifying about all sorts of criming, both state and Federal.

 

Does anyone disagree?


The National Enquirer?  And your types think Fox is not credible.

  • Confused 4
  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

And the Daily Wire was just a rehash of the NYTimes article which is paywall.

Shugerman gives the prosecution some benefit of the doubt, writing that they could still “have some latitude to develop their case during trial.”

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, impulse said:

 

I wonder if they'll get that Dominion money back after a Georgia court case showed you actually can hack the machines with a Bic pen and a $10 USB chip?

 

But only after analysing the system in a lab for months.... 😃

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, stevenl said:

So an opinion piece on perceived bias relates to factual reporting?

Unfortunately that's the level of your posting on here.

It not perceived bias.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 4/24/2024 at 12:49 PM, candide said:
On 4/24/2024 at 10:31 AM, impulse said:

 

I wonder if they'll get that Dominion money back after a Georgia court case showed you actually can hack the machines with a Bic pen and a $10 USB chip?

 

But only after analysing the system in a lab for months....

 

And you figure that any hackers didn't figure it out, even if it took a few months to cut the first USB chip?

  • Confused 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

And you figure that any hackers didn't figure it out, even if it took a few months to cut the first USB chip?

There is no proof anyone got a copy of the system before the election. Also note that the machines are not connected.

The only ones who got a copy of the system have been the Kraken team. They had to illegally enter the office and got caught on camera. That was after the election.

 

As usual, you have nothing.

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, candide said:

There is no proof anyone got a copy of the system before the election. Also note that the machines are not connected.

The only ones who got a copy of the system have been the Kraken team. They had to illegally enter the office and got caught on camera. That was after the election.

 

As usual, you have nothing.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/06/14/politics/dominion-voting-georgia-vulnerabilities-2024/index.html

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436

 

https://apnews.com/article/election-security-voting-machines-software-2024-80a23479d8a767ba9333b2324c4e424b

 

 

  • Confused 1
Posted
19 hours ago, stevenl said:

So an opinion piece on perceived bias relates to factual reporting?

Unfortunately that's the level of your posting on here.

So only your opinion pieces are factual... typical liberal thought process... unfortunately for the forum that is your level on here.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
On 4/24/2024 at 12:19 AM, Danderman123 said:

If the Prosecution used the word "fraud", they were using it in the layman's sense, not a legal sense.

 

pure speculation. 

  • Love It 1
Posted
17 hours ago, impulse said:

 

And you figure that any hackers didn't figure it out, even if it took a few months to cut the first USB chip?

Don't beat around the bush: do you believe Dominion voting machines were hacked during the 2020 Georgia election?

 

Just talking about potential hacking techniques is pointless. I could claim that someone installed counterfeit voting machines, theoretically.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 4/25/2024 at 8:06 AM, Danderman123 said:

Whatever your sources, you post a lot of disinformation. Why is that?

 

 

DISINFORMATION... that's a typical non response to someone else's perception when it doesn't support your narrative... what sources do  support your narrative... I'll wait. 

Posted
On 4/24/2024 at 11:36 AM, Roo Island said:

  You won't know the facts if only reading Faux News or other dodgy media outlets 

Faux is as dodgy as your NYTimes... just on opposite ends of perception.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...