Jump to content

Why the hush money case against Donald Trump is on shaky ground


Social Media

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Yes, the walls are closing in.

The lastest bombshell allegation.

This is the beginning of the end.


Think we have all heard this tune before..

Adam, is that you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:


The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine. 

Meanwhile in New York, criminal illegal aliens that have been convicted of violent crimes and that have been arrested again for gun and drug charges are released on their own recognizance.

 

It is interesting that the same people that want to take guns from all law-abiding citizens do not want to prosecute and incarcerate criminals arrested with illegal guns. 

 

Get Trump. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Violent crime rates in large cities have fallen sharply during Biden’s presidency and you are using anecdotal point to make an argument. You are dismissed. 

Rachel Maddow tell you that?  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stoner said:

 

don't bother. tired of the same routine of our guy is not as much of an asshat as your guy. no matter the side. 

 

I would really like to know. No baiting here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

You mean like you and the rest of the haters when they display their TDS

TDS is a term created for school age children. Along with the other childish names the right came up with. Not very smart people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

TDS is a term created for school age children. Along with the other childish names the right came up with. Not very smart people

I'm always amused when people like you accuse others of not being smart. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Roo Island said:

What? Bizarre term to use. And not true.

Bizarre that you do not understand how it is true. It is the basis of leftism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

TDS is a term created for school age children. Along with the other childish names the right came up with. Not very smart people

really,  so there isn't any name calling in any of these threads from anyone opposed to El Trumpo?

Edited by frank83628
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/26/2024 at 1:36 PM, Roo Island said:

I tend to avoid opinion pieces unless from a really respected source.

unless they're bias against Trump you mean, then anything goes!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

really,  so there isn't any name calling in any of these threads from anyone opposed to El Trumpo?

 

Some, but MAGA members take the prize for name calling. Mostly just falling in line with their leader.

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

unless they're bias against Trump you mean, then anything goes!

 

Nope. Don't agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

 

Some, but MAGA members take the prize for name calling. Mostly just falling in line with their leader.

Nope. Don't agree.

Is MAGA not name calling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Stormy absolutely. MaDougal I frankly don't know enough about to make an informed guess.

 

So yeah I am sure he paid Stormy to shut up. She saw an opportunity to sell her story once Trump was in the spotlight as a Presidential candidate. And he wanted the story to go away. 

I agree with you on this.

 

What do you think of Trump telling the jury that he never had sex with either lady?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

As far as the case is concerned, it makes no difference if Trump has sex with them or not. 

 

I think he probably did, but what difference does it make? 

 

Again, no one seems to know what the crime is, beyond the misdemeanor bookkeeping charges. 

 

The NDA was legal, and influencing an election is legal. 

 

 

The substantive problem is that Trump has already told the jury that he never had sex with either lady.

 

You may remember that false testimony or  an attorney telling lies is very damaging to the side that lies

 

 

As for your tired "questions" about the underlying crime, I will give you the same advice that I gave your fellow Trump fan:

 

There is no point in trying to influence this crowd with your talking points - the verdict will come, and then all of your posts won't matter. No one will care about your or my opinion about the case after the verdict. Because in Trump World trying to win the day with transitory talking points is job #1, but you could win every day and it will all be forgotten after the verdict.

 

So relax. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

misdemeanor

Unless it's to conceal an underlying crime, then it's a felony. Which is what Trump is charged with.

 

The crimey stuff will be outlined later in the trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

It was you that made the false claim, and you want me to prove it. Typical leftist. 

 

OMG. Ya can't! Caught out again. Must be embarrassing. :cheesy:

Ok. Answer my question. What president was the biggest liar? Facts only. Credible sites only. No deflection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I agree with you on this.

 

What do you think of Trump telling the jury that he never had sex with either lady?

Did he tell them that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...