Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, novacova said:

they were arresting people for going to empty beaches.

 

They shut the beaches and arrested people here in Thailand too.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

The claim that the mRNA injection saved lives to the extent it's claimed is a strawman because it's impossible to definitively prove.

 

... and the reverse is equally impossible to prove, so what is your point?

 

Do I believe medical experts or some random conspiracy theorist on a minor forum who is apparently "seeking the truth"?

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The Pro-Vax team is becoming less and less vocal as the true facts emerge daily.  Hard to keep fighting when you've got no legs to stand on.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Posts with unsourced and unsubstantiated claims have been removed, along with off-topic posts commenting on fellow forum members.

Posted
3 hours ago, Gsxrnz said:

The best part of covid was the sign-in register at the malls. I routinely signed in as George Orwell, Eric Arthur Blair, Winstin Smith, Ray Bradbury, or Aldous Huxley.

 

I always took the time to look at the list of those preceding me into the mall.  Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Winston Churchill, and Adolf Hitler were frequent attendees. Once I even saw a Donald Trump on the list.:coffee1:

 

Edit: Just remembered - my phone number was 451 1984 1984

 

   All those heat testing when entering shops , putting an electronic thermometer to your head .

Did they ever catch even one person with a high temperature ?

I was getting tested numerous times every day , as was everyone else 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

We can certainly get a good idea of how many were killed via ventilators

 

You think a significant number of people were killed by ventilators? Why were they on the ventilator in the first place?

 

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

But which medical experts?  You seem to imply that Fauci is an exemplary example of a trusted medical expert.

 

Too may assumptions and inferences from things I've not implied. I'm not from the US. Fauci worked directly or indirectly for Trump. I'll give him some credit for at least having the balls to show us how much of a nutter Trump was for suggesting we get injected with bleach or disinfectant, or irradiated with massive doses of UV. I tend to believe the doctors and nurses that were working on the front line and seeing what COVID did to previously healthy people first hand. There were many such cases all across the UK media (left leaning, right leaning and closer to central). The flu this was not (to another poster).

 

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

That's what differentiates you from others like me.  We don't attempt to uphold our beliefs in favour of what the real truth is.

 

Actually there we would be similar, except that I'm on to other things now as I don't have the time to polish my hindsight glasses and shout "I told you so" while denigrating the majority of the world's medical experts with no personal credential greater than a boy scout first aid badge.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Remember this?

 

Lockdowns and face masks ‘unequivocally’ cut spread of Covid, report finds

 

Royal Society review looks at non-pharmaceutical interventions when applied in packages of several measures

 

Measures taken during the Covid pandemic such as social distancing and wearing face masks “unequivocally” reduced the spread of infections, a report has found.

 

Experts looked at the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) – not drugs or vaccines – when applied in packages that combine a number of measures that complement one another.

 

The Royal Society report, called Covid-19: examining the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions, reviewed the evidence gathered during the pandemic for six groups of NPIs and their effectiveness in reducing transmission.

...

When assessed individually, there was positive – if limited – evidence of transmission reduction from many of the NPIs used in the pandemic, the review found. However, evidence of a positive effect was clear when countries used combinations of NPIs.

 

(more)

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/24/lockdowns-face-masks-unequivocally-cut-spread-covid-study-finds

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Posted (edited)

Remember this?

 

Earlier lockdown could have saved lives of 30,000, Hancock tells Covid inquiry

Tens of thousands of lives could have been saved if the UK had locked down three weeks earlier, Matt Hancock has told the Covid inquiry, as he described the operation of Boris Johnson’s Downing Street as undermined by a “culture of fear”.

 

The former health secretary said his staff were abused by Dominic Cummings and that Johnson’s then chief adviser attempted to exclude ministers and even Johnson himself from key decisions at the start of the pandemic, hampering the government’s response.

...

Hancock argued that in retrospect the ideal date for a first lockdown would have been three weeks earlier than the eventual date of 23 March 2020, saying this could have prevented about 90% of the death toll in the first Covid wave, or more than 30,000 lives.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/nov/30/hancock-tells-covid-inquiry-of-toxic-culture-in-johnson-government

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Or this:

 

What We’ve Learned About So-Called ‘Lockdowns’ and the COVID-19 Pandemic

"Plenty of peer-reviewed studies have found government restrictions early in the pandemic, such as business closures and physical distancing measures, reduced COVID-19 cases and/or mortality, compared with what would have happened without those measures.

...

In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, as the virus spread around the globe, many countries implemented restrictions on movement and social gatherings in an effort to flatten the curve — or reduce sharp spikes in caseloads to avoid overwhelming health care facilities. Without vaccines or evidence-based treatments, these non-pharmaceutical interventions, or NPIs, were the only public health measures available for months to combat the pandemic.

...

There have been a lot of studies assessing whether and to what extent so-called “lockdowns” and various NPIs have been effective, and plenty of research that has concluded these measures can limit transmission, or reduce cases and deaths.

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/03/scicheck-what-weve-learned-about-so-called-lockdowns-and-the-covid-19-pandemic/

 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Or this:

 

Study: Physical distancing better at stemming COVID-19 than US/Mexico border closure

 

A genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in San Diego and Mexico reveals that physical distancing was more effective than international border closures in containing the virus.

 

Scripps Research scientists and colleagues sequenced more than 82,000 SARS-CoV-2 samples gathered from routine genomic surveillance in San Diego and the state of Baja California, Mexico, to reconstruct viral spread dynamics from March 2020 to the end of the first Omicron surge in December 2022.

...

Mandate relaxation led to more distant travel

During stay-at-home and physical distancing mandates early in the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 spread primarily within and between adjacent counties. But as mandates eased, people started to travel farther, and COVID-19 spread from distant locations rose.

 

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/study-physical-distancing-better-stemming-covid-19-usmexico-border-closure

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

  It would be interesting to see a genuine study of how many years of life were added by the Orwellian way Covid was handled, and how many years of life were taken away by the Orwellian way Covid was handled.

 

 

Study finds more than 28 million extra years of life lost in 31 countries in 2020

Over 28 million more years of life were lost than expected in 2020 in 31 upper-middle and high-income countries, finds a study published by The BMJ today.

 

Except for Taiwan, New Zealand, Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and South Korea, all other countries examined had more premature deaths than expected in 2020, with a higher rate in men than women. The highest rates of excess premature deaths were in Russia, Bulgaria, Lithuania, and the US.

 

Understanding the full impact of the covid-19 pandemic requires not only counting excess deaths (difference between observed and expected numbers of deaths from all causes), but also analysing how premature those deaths are. 

 

https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom/study-finds-more-than-28-million-extra-years-of-life-lost-in-31-countries-in-2020/

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...