Jump to content

1,882 new COVID-19 hospitalisations and 16 deaths in the last week


webfact

Recommended Posts

Just now, connda said:

I bet you're up to date on your Covid vaccines and your boosters?

 

Actually no and I only had the first ones to protect my elderly parents.  Considering my late mother had mid/latter stage Alzheimer's at the time, my father was her main carer and made her a promise that he would never have her placed in a care home, I thought it was the responsible thing to do.  Why, do you have any problems with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, AhFarangJa said:

Also, do the maths, if every person on the planet was supposed to have the shots needed to clear covid, it would take all the manufacturers 30 years to produce enough vaccines.

 

No idea what numbers you're on about.

 

Since COVID vaccines were begun 3-1/2 years ago in late 2020, more than 13 Billion doses have been given. The world has a population of about 8 billion.

 

Screenshot_6.jpg.e8a1d04a121eaa6a2b0e2e409b80ca3a.jpg

 

Source:

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No free boosters for elderly or vulnerable citizens in Thailand, they cost money , and the government in Thailand don't like spending money on its people , excluding themselves , of course . I'm 75 and here in Ireland I got messages from the health authority , my GP, my local health nurse and followed by a reminder , to get my free booster recently. Same with the flu vaccine every autumn.
 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

wait a minute didnt the orange guy say covid would go away when biden won??? im confused

 

slow clap for all the grandpas that get angry here when they see thais wearing masks...going to the funeral are you????

 

i must of missed where they talked about trump in this thread. are you sure you are posting in the right place ? 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, connda said:

Good lord, put it into perspective:

1,882 Covid cases in one week out of a population of...71,877,145 people in Thailand.

 

I already did:

 

The numbers always look small when you look at them one week at a time vs. an entire country's population base. But not so small when you look at the broader picture.

 

Cumulative since the start of the pandemic in Thailand -- 34,641 COVID deaths and 4.77 million COVID hospitalizations, including 1,882 new ones just in the past week.

 

Screenshot_5.jpg.777b6543b078499e09dee44667d5cd57.jpg

 

https://ddc.moph.go.th/covid19-dashboard/?dashboard=main

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

This is something I would say to someone who is about to get a booster.

Yeah, that's a funny reply🤗. Thanks. However, I would say this to you, because I get the benefit and you have to expect to suffer 🥴

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, BKKBike09 said:

Wearing face masks did not reduce risk of Covid infection after first Omicron wave, research shows

 

Thursday 16 May 2024

 

There's separate questions that arise in such debate, and they're different.

 

1. Does mask wearing at the society level reduce the spread of COVID in a society at large? Different studies have made different judgments about this, where many factors other than masking can drive infection rates.

 

2. Does proper mask wearing protect the mask wearer, e.g., reduce their individual risk of contracting COVID...  The scientific opinion on this is overwhelmingly yes.

 

The Evidence Is Clear: Wearing a Mask Does Reduce the Spread of COVID-19

A new review of studies from around the world finds that masking can reduce the odds of getting the virus.

 

Published on November 1, 2023

 

Yes, wearing a mask really does work to reduce the spread of COVID-19, according to a new comprehensive review published October 31, 2023, in JAMA Network Open.

 

After analyzing more than 40 studies conducted with seven different methodologies, the evidence was clear: Masks can reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19 and of being infected by COVID-19, says coauthor Tom Frieden, MD, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives and former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

 

https://www.everydayhealth.com/coronavirus/the-evidence-is-clear-wearing-a-mask-does-reduce-the-spread-of-covid-19/

 

 

Face mask effectiveness: What science knows now

October 29, 2023

 

When the COVID-19 pandemic took off in 2020, so too did questions over the effectiveness of wearing a face mask to prevent the spread of the virus. Now, three and a half years later, what does the science say?  

 

In an interview for 60 Minutes, CBS News chief medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook posed that question to Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech university professor specializing in aerosol science.

 

"They are very helpful in reducing the chances that the person will get COVID because it's reducing the amount of virus that you would inhale from the air around you," Marr said about masks.  

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-mask-effectiveness-what-science-knows-now-60-minutes/

 

 

April 23, 2024

 

Hospital-onset COVID-19 surged after end of universal screening, masking

 

HOUSTON — Ending universal masking and admission testing of all hospitalized patients was associated with an increase in hospital-onset COVID-19 at five Massachusetts hospitals, researchers found.

 

“What prompted the study was our published viewpoints that the use of universal masking and testing continues to have value in hospitals where there is a high concentration of vulnerable patients during times of substantial respiratory virus transmission,” Theodore R. Pak, MD, PhD, an infectious diseases fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, told Healio.

 

https://www.healio.com/news/infectious-disease/20240423/hospitalonset-covid19-surged-after-end-of-universal-screening-masking

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, connda said:

Virtually all of my Thai family with the exception of my wife got the shots.  Many of them have gotten Covid two, and some, three times.  Out of my friends, family, and acquaintances (most in the US) who did not get the shots, those who have gotten Covid have only gotten in once.

 

I'm sure your personal stories are scientifically significant....

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, terryofcrete said:

No free boosters for elderly or vulnerable citizens in Thailand, they cost money , and the government in Thailand don't like spending money on its people , excluding themselves , of course . I'm 75 and here in Ireland I got messages from the health authority , my GP, my local health nurse and followed by a reminder , to get my free booster recently. Same with the flu vaccine every autumn.
 

I got three Pfizer jabs 'on the house' here in Phitsanulok.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Are you saying natural imminuty doesn't exist?

 

Immunity protections from prior COVID infections and immunity protections from COVID vaccinations both contribute to immune protections in society, but neither is a permanent or total immunity against COVID.

 

What Is Natural Immunity?

For example, if someone gets natural immunity from a COVID-19 infection, the immunity may fade after 3 months.

...

What Is Vaccine-Induced Immunity?

Vaccines can protect your immune system against diseases without making you sick.

...

Severe vaccine side effects are rare. In most cases, the benefits of getting vaccinated against a disease far outweigh the risks.

 

COVID: Natural vs. Vaccine Immunity

Some people who haven’t gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 worry about the safety of the vaccines and say they’d prefer to get natural immunity. But there are several dangers to doing that.

 

If you’re not vaccinated, there’s a much bigger chance that the virus could make you seriously sick or kill you.

 

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/natural-immunity-overview

 

 

Is natural immunity better than a vaccine?

Natural immunity is the antibody protection your body creates against a germ once you’ve been infected with it. Natural immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19 is no better than vaccine-acquired immunity, and it comes with far greater risks. Studies show that natural immunity to the virus weakens over time and does so faster than immunity provided by COVID-19 vaccination.

 

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

Posted 11/22/23

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ryandb said:

Not this bs again, I've never had one and never had covid once or been sick in the 4 plus years over this hypercondriacs wet dream people are living in, it's a cold unless you have underlying health problems, if you do, treat them or act accordingly.

 

Far from a cold Sir, and no it's not the flu either.....

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Immunity protections from prior COVID infections and immunity protections from COVID vaccinations both contribute to immune protections in society, but neither is a permanent or total immunity against COVID.

 

What Is Natural Immunity?

For example, if someone gets natural immunity from a COVID-19 infection, the immunity may fade after 3 months.

...

What Is Vaccine-Induced Immunity?

Vaccines can protect your immune system against diseases without making you sick.

...

Severe vaccine side effects are rare. In most cases, the benefits of getting vaccinated against a disease far outweigh the risks.

 

COVID: Natural vs. Vaccine Immunity

Some people who haven’t gotten vaccinated against COVID-19 worry about the safety of the vaccines and say they’d prefer to get natural immunity. But there are several dangers to doing that.

 

If you’re not vaccinated, there’s a much bigger chance that the virus could make you seriously sick or kill you.

 

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/natural-immunity-overview

 

 

Is natural immunity better than a vaccine?

Natural immunity is the antibody protection your body creates against a germ once you’ve been infected with it. Natural immunity to the virus that causes COVID-19 is no better than vaccine-acquired immunity, and it comes with far greater risks. Studies show that natural immunity to the virus weakens over time and does so faster than immunity provided by COVID-19 vaccination.

 

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

Posted 11/22/23

 

As I say only one side of the story is allowed on here and that's the side you continue to post.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

As I say only one side of the story is allowed on here and that's the side you continue to post.

 

You mean you're unhappy that you can't post nonsense YouTube videos about COVID, or posts by "doctors" who aren't really MDs, or those who have long histories of peddling documented COVID misinformation, running businesses that sell fake COVID "cures," writing bogus journal articles that end up getting retracted, etc etc....  Yes, they all have quite some stories to tell.

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Far from a cold Sir, and no it's not the flu either.....

Yep it's not a cold and it's not the flu you are correct. Three different virus although the common cold and the flu come in different varieties. I guess Omicron does too. But for saying it's far from a cold this is not the case for the vast majority of people. Covid 19, the flu and the common cold share many symptoms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Covid 19, the flu and the common cold share many symptoms. 

 

Some things the same... some not.

Study: COVID Still Deadlier Than the Flu -- But the Gap Is Narrowing

 

"...5.7% of patients with COVID-19 died within 30 days of admission versus 4.24% of patients with influenza, reported Ziyad Al-Aly, MD, of the VA St. Louis Health Care System, and colleagues.

 

After adjusting for variables, the risk of death in people hospitalized for COVID-19 was 35% higher (adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.66), the authors detailed in a research letter in JAMA.

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1327600-study-covid-still-deadlier-than-the-flu-but-the-gap-is-narrowing/

 

 

"...there were nearly twice as many hospitalizations for COVID-19 compared with the flu for the 2023-2024 season, according to CDC surveillance data. In the study population, over three times the number of people were hospitalized for COVID-19 than for the flu."

 

https://archive.ph/Fru20#selection-1363.47-1363.48

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Youtube vids featuring this person will not be allowed. His views oppose the narrative

 

no, the forum's policy in general doesn't allow private party social media content (including YouTube) in news and current affairs topic, except as follows, regardless of their particular views:

 

"18. Social media content is acceptable in most forums. However in factual areas such as but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency, and must include a link to the original source."

 

https://aseannow.com/forum_rules/

 

But the Wikipedia entry you linked to for that individual did include the following interesting notation:

 

"During the COVID-19 pandemic Clancy was involved in controversy when he was quoted by Australian MP Craig Kelly in support of unverified information about claimed benefits of the drugs hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Newcastle University issued a statement in which it distanced itself from Clancy's views, mentioning also that the vice-chancellor had said the university did "not consider Robert Clancy a subject matter expert on COVID-19".[5]

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Guess that depends on how much you follow the news, and what sources you follow. UK still running almost 100 COVID deaths per week:

 

Surge in Covid cases prompt fears of a mini-wave

Proportion of people testing positive for the virus has jumped from 4.6 per cent to 7.1 per cent in the space of a week

May 2, 2024

 

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/surge-covid-cases-prompt-fears-mini-wave-3037684?ITO=newsnow

 

NHS in England facing ‘storm of pressure’ as flu and Covid cases surge

Average of 3,631 patients in hospital with Covid during Christmas week, data shows, a rise of 57% in a month

 

Dec. 2023

 

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/dec/29/nhs-england-storm-of-pressure-flu-covid-cases-surge

 

 

UKHSA current info:

 

Screenshot_2.jpg.469443667a643494ef2162b74de1a09f.jpg

 

https://ukhsa-dashboard.data.gov.uk/

 

 

That's one onliine news source and a Guardian article from December. I'll stick to my views. I won't requote your other post but I did state how most people feel when they have covid. I didn't mention hospitalisations or deaths. I was in hospital with flu pre-covid and I felt awful but my two covid bouts were pretty mild.

 

I did know that you'd be the one replying to my posts as you seem to be one of few posters that still takes covid seriously....and there's nothing wrong with that, it's not a dig. We all have our own viewpoints.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

That's handy isn't it even if said YT vids supply links it cannot be posted. You didn't answer my question though. Do you think he is qualified enough to take a medical/scientific opinion opposing the narrative? Your post was it's all disinformation from unqualified people.

 

I did answer your question above, citing your own Wiki entry on Clancy... that's also been reported elsewhere.

Hydroxychloroquine in Australia: a cautionary tale for journalists and scientists

...

Sometimes news organisations face a dilemma covering scientists recognised as specialists but whose views sit outside the mainstream. Retired immunologist Robert Clancy was an advocate for hydroxychloroquine frequently cited by Australian MP Craig Kelly. In February 2021, Sydney Morning Herald published an opinion piece by Clancy touting the drug’s benefits alongside an opinion piece by epidemiologist Catherine Bennett arguing there was insufficient evidence. 

 

The effect was to falsely suggest an evenly balanced debate within the scientific community. To address this, the newspaper added a note from Liam Mannix to the op-eds stating that “[t]he evidence shows hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are not effective in treating or preventing COVID-19.” The University of Newcastle issued a statement that it “does not consider Robert Clancy a subject matter expert on COVID-19.” 

 

Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism

https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/hydroxychloroquine-australia-cautionary-tale-journalists-and-scientists

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...