Trump found guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records

[Chomper Higgot]

11 minutes ago, riclag said:

Good news in the Dem trial of Trump in nY. 

Yale Law professor outlines potential Trump legal strategy following guilty verdict: 'What the nation needs'

 

A potential Temporary restraining  order barring Merchan from declaring a guilty judgment through a federal judge.
 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/yale-law-professor-outlines-potential-183007962.html

Oh ‘a potential’.

[earlinclaifornia]

16 minutes ago, riclag said:

Good news in the Dem trial of Trump in nY. 

Yale Law professor outlines potential Trump legal strategy following guilty verdict: 'What the nation needs'

 

A potential Temporary restraining  order barring Merchan from declaring a guilty judgment through a federal judge.
 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/yale-law-professor-outlines-potential-183007962.html

Take years to complete!

Are you serious or 

Trumpers pour all their hopes and dreams into rumors

They’re on an emotional roller coaster as they jump on each new hope only to get dropped on their heads

[Roo Island]

6 hours ago, morrobay said:

First line correction : Isn't relevant how Trump is doing.  Or  It is irrelevant how Trump is doing.  The 2020 election was questionable. I would expect an army of republican poll watchers to be on stations this time.

It wasn't questionable at all. Probably the safest and most secure election in history. Those who question it have drank the kool-aid. Sad

[Roo Island]

24 minutes ago, riclag said:

Good news in the Dem trial of Trump in nY. 

Yale Law professor outlines potential Trump legal strategy following guilty verdict: 'What the nation needs'

 

A potential Temporary restraining  order barring Merchan from declaring a guilty judgment through a federal judge.
 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/yale-law-professor-outlines-potential-183007962.html

More BS from Faux News

[earlinclaifornia]

6 hours ago, morrobay said:

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wing-media-reckoning-outlets-pay-130040167.html

[Roo Island]

5 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wing-media-reckoning-outlets-pay-130040167.html

It boggles my mind how some gravitate to these dodgy media outlets. While claiming MSM can't be trusted. Gotta be a screw loose somewhere

[jerrymahoney]

REDUX 3 June

 

Regarding any (immediate) Supreme Court intervention:

 

Jury Instructions -- THE FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT pg. 31:

The first of the People's theories of “unlawful means" which
I will now define for you is the Federal Election Campaign Act.

 

****************

 

"It is not clear if the federal election law violations could be the basis for prosecution in state court," (UCLA election law expert Richard) Hasen said. "There is also an argument that Trump did not violate federal election law, for example, if his payments were personal and not campaign related."

 

Richard Pildes, law professor at New York University School of Law and an expert on constitutional law, said including the FECA violation as an "unlawful means" provided a federal question for Trump to bring to the Supreme Court.

 

"If the Trump team wants to argue that his actions do not amount to a violation of that federal law, the Supreme Court would have the power to decide on the proper meaning of FECA," Pildes told Salon. "Because it’s a federal law, the Supreme Court has the power to resolve the proper interpretation of that law."

 

https://www.salon.com/2024/06/01/ive-never-seen-that-legal-scholars-say-has-opening-to-turn-to-for-help/

 

****************

 

Looming Over Trump’s Conviction: Reversal by the '13th Juror' - World News - Thailand News, Travel & Forum - ASEAN NOW

 

Edited June 9 by jerrymahoney

[Yagoda]

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And if there is, and the hearing finds that the Posts were made by troll with zero connection to any of the Jurors, you’ll not accept the findings and consider anyone who does an enemy of you and your family.

Got to have the hearing first, I dont prejudge unlike the Tumphobic Socialists.

 

Enemy of civilization is more apropos.

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Got to have the hearing first, I dont prejudge unlike the Tumphobic Socialists.

 

Enemy of civilization is more apropos.

OK let’s put that to the test.

 

Will you accept Judge Marchant’s ruling on the subject social media post?

I assure you I will.

 

 

Edited June 9 by Chomper Higgot

[morrobay]

Ok fine, no evidence was found. But when 44,000 votes determined election. And you cannot prove there was no fraud/prove a negative. Then it is questionable.https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/940689086/narrow-wins-in-these-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

[earlinclaifornia]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Got to have the hearing first, I dont prejudge unlike the Tumphobic Socialists.

 

Enemy of civilization is more apropos.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/merchan-called-warning-troll-comment-suggesting-trump-jury-compromised

 

That meeting was last week and heard nothing further for the court to decide, Yada!

Fox News host Turley:

"The odds that such a posting is a genuine account of a juror in this day and age is relatively small. You would have a higher likelihood of finding the key to the Dead Sea Scrolls on the graffiti left on the courthouse. That does not mean that it should not be investigated, but the mere appearance of such a posting is hardly cause for an all-hands-on-deck call from the court," he added.

 

That hearing was last week and now it is as dead as Yada

[earlinclaifornia]

6 minutes ago, morrobay said:

Ok fine, no evidence was found. But when 44,000 votes determined election. And you cannot prove there was no fraud/prove a negative. Then it is questionable.https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/940689086/narrow-wins-in-these-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

By your analogy close elections proves fraud then?

[Roo Island]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Got to have the hearing first, I dont prejudge unlike the Tumphobic Socialists.

 

Enemy of civilization is more apropos.

Enemy of civilization and democracy are Trump supporters. They can't handle the truth. Only alternative facts.

[Captain Flack]

Fake video and replies to it removed.

[candide]

2 hours ago, morrobay said:

Ok fine, no evidence was found. But when 44,000 votes determined election. And you cannot prove there was no fraud/prove a negative. Then it is questionable.https://www.npr.org/2020/12/02/940689086/narrow-wins-in-these-key-states-powered-biden-to-the-presidency

There have been numerous recounts and audits in those States, including GOP partisan audits.

You have nothing.

[ripstanley]

Could Aseanow please remove BREAKING NEWS from the title? This happened a few weeks ago. It is well past the breaking stage 

[GroveHillWanderer]

On 6/8/2024 at 8:53 AM, Yagoda said:

Well outside the imaginary world of Claifornia, jokes about jury misconduct are explored under oath.

Jury misconduct is only explored (under any jurisdiction) when there's some kind of credible evidence that jury misconduct may have occurred.

 

There's no such evidence here.

 

A self-described ‘s***poster’ launched a Trump conviction conspiracy theory with one Facebook message

 

As the article explains: 

 

Quote

On his page, Anderson describes himself as a “transabled & a professional s***poster.”

 

And after Judge Merchan had notified the parties of the post in question, Anderson posted:

 

Quote

“Take it easy… I’m a professional sh***poster.”

 

Edited June 9 by GroveHillWanderer

[earlinclaifornia]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-trump-biden-neck-and-neck-06-09-2024/

MAGA!

A new story is needed now that the rump lead in the swing states has left the building.

[jerrymahoney]

From Washington Post The Trump Trials memo 10 June Bangkok time

 

And in New York, the probation office will hold a virtual interview Monday with Trump, which is the next step in his presentencing process after his hush-money conviction. The former president will participate in the meeting from Palm Beach, Fla., according to a person familiar with the arrangements who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a proceeding that is not public.

************

 

So I guess no drug test via remote.

 

[Yellowtail]

I'm betting Trump is in jail for the Republican convention. Takers? 

[Danderman123]

4 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-trump-biden-neck-and-neck-06-09-2024/

MAGA!

A new story is needed now that the rump lead in the swing states has left the building.

Early polls are not very predictive of the final result.

[Danderman123]

34 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I'm betting Trump is in jail for the Republican convention. Takers? 

Donald Trump to Las Vegas Rally Attendees: 'I Don't Care About You'

 

"By the way, isn't the breeze nice. Do you feel the breeze? I don't want anybody going on me. We need every voter. I don't care about you. I just want your vote. I don't care." His supporters laughed as he then said, "See now, the press will take that, and they'll say, 'He said a horrible thing.'"

 

Trump is clearly having a mental breakdowns in front of our eyes.

 

He may be committed for observation, not jailed.

Edited June 10 by Danderman123

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

I'm betting Trump is in jail for the Republican convention. Takers? 

One of the ways to avoid a prison sentence is to accept responsibility for the actions that got you convicted and show genuine contrition.

 

I’m not sure that has been explained to Convicted Felon Trump.

 

[Yellowtail]

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

One of the ways to avoid a prison sentence is to accept responsibility for the actions that got you convicted and show genuine contrition.

 

I’m not sure that has been explained to Convicted Felon Trump.

 

I do not think Trump believes he did anything illegal. He paid for a non-disclosure agreement and called it a legal expense. Had he called it a campaign expense he would have been guilty of campaign finance laws and been fined. 

 

Trump would be a coward and a fool to admit he did anything illegal when he didn't. 

 

The left wants to see him grovel. 

 

 

[Yellowtail]

Trump’s lawyer pays Stormy’s lawyer to influence one party to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

Stormy’s lawyer pays Stormy to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

 

An NDA is payment in consideration of a contract, which is legal.

 

Trump pays his lawyer and calls it legal expenses, which is legal.

 

Stormy violates the contract, which is illegal.  

 

The FEC looked at it and did not prosecute because there was no campaign finance violation, because payment for an NDA does not qualify as a campaign expense. 

 

Bragg looked at it and did not prosecute. 

 

The Biden DOJ sends one of their top guys to New York to make up a campaign finance violation. 

 

Trump is indicted.

 

[Eric Loh]

24 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump’s lawyer pays Stormy’s lawyer to influence one party to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

Stormy’s lawyer pays Stormy to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

 

An NDA is payment in consideration of a contract, which is legal.

 

Trump pays his lawyer and calls it legal expenses, which is legal.

 

Stormy violates the contract, which is illegal.  

 

The FEC looked at it and did not prosecute because there was no campaign finance violation, because payment for an NDA does not qualify as a campaign expense. 

 

Bragg looked at it and did not prosecute. 

 

The Biden DOJ sends one of their top guys to New York to make up a campaign finance violation. 

 

Trump is indicted.

 

My take is Joe Biden is a closet admirer of Trump and was helping Trump to raise millions from his campaign finance conviction. 

[jerrymahoney]

56 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I do not think Trump believes he did anything illegal. He paid for a non-disclosure agreement and called it a legal expense

Per NY Times June 9, 2024 EDT

 

As part of the preparation of the (pre-sentencing) report, the official is likely to ask Mr. Trump about what occurred that led to the charges against him.

[riclag]

50 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump’s lawyer pays Stormy’s lawyer to influence one party to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

Stormy’s lawyer pays Stormy to enter into an NDA with another party, which is legal.

 

An NDA is payment in consideration of a contract, which is legal.

 

Trump pays his lawyer and calls it legal expenses, which is legal.

 

Stormy violates the contract, which is illegal.  

 

The FEC looked at it and did not prosecute because there was no campaign finance violation, because payment for an NDA does not qualify as a campaign expense. 

 

Bragg looked at it and did not prosecute. 

 

The Biden DOJ sends one of their top guys to New York to make up a campaign finance violation. 

 

Trump is indicted.

 

Since the Dem lawfare couldnt get Trump through the A Federal Election 

Committee charging decision in 2021,

biden  in Nov 2022 made comments in a presser that Trump will  be stopped from taking power constitutionally . biden grew frustrated with his DOJ  efforts  . One month later Colangelo steps down from the # 3 spot at the DOJ, to join 

bragg.

 

This is what Americans call the weaponization of Government agencies ,to go after your political opponents, history documents this type of corruption in 3rd world dictatorship and communist countries.

[Eric Loh]

5 minutes ago, riclag said:

Since the Dem lawfare couldnt get Trump through the A Federal Election 

Committee charging decision in 2021,

biden  in Nov 2022 made comments in a presser that Trump will  be stopped from taking power constitutionally . biden grew frustrated with his DOJ  efforts  . One month later Colangelo steps down from the # 3 spot at the DOJ, to join 

bragg.

 

This is what Americans call the weaponization of Government agencies ,to go after your political opponents, history documents this type of corruption in 3rd world dictatorship and communist countries.

Colangelo didn't convict Trump. It was a jury of peers vetted and selected by both defense and prosecutor attorneys that convicted him. If there was weaponization, Hunter will not be charged and on trial. 

[riclag]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I do not think Trump believes he did anything illegal. He paid for a non-disclosure agreement and called it a legal expense. Had he called it a campaign expense he would have been guilty of campaign finance laws and been fined. 

 

Trump would be a coward and a fool to admit he did anything illegal when he didn't. 

 

The left wants to see him grovel. 

 

 

The radical  far left wants him dead!

Sick SOB’s . 
 bidens sick sycophants!

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/trump-felony-mean-loss-secret-104516216.html#:~:text=Thompson's bill%2C introduced in April,post-presidency perks Trump enjoys.