Jump to content

Far-Right Rhetoric Intensifies Following Trump's Guilty Verdict


Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, illisdean said:

Definitely NOT following your regime media deep state brainwashing activist news fallacy for certain.

 

Show some proof on the "revenge and retribution" threats fromTrump. 

 

Maybe you and your pals here confuse enforcing laws as revenge.

 

It should come as no surprise America is destructing under Biden thanks to more than 80M morons that voted for him.

 

You as well and as usual have NOTHING.

Ignorance is bliss.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, illisdean said:

Definitely NOT following your regime media deep state brainwashing activist news fallacy for certain.

 

Show some proof on the "revenge and retribution" threats fromTrump. 

 

Maybe you and your pals here confuse enforcing laws as revenge.

 

It should come as no surprise America is destructing under Biden thanks to more than 80M morons that voted for him.

 

You as well and as usual have NOTHING.


Maybe you forgot already, but on June 11 you already asked me for proof on the revenge and retribution threats from Trump. And I replied with several links. Did you not see that? Or do you not want to see that?

 

ADEA7F57-0C61-4838-A490-6908BEA92FE6.jpeg

21442E8C-2C89-4C47-88BA-6548E7C5138A.jpeg

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, illisdean said:

Definitely NOT following your regime media deep state brainwashing activist news fallacy for certain.

 

Show some proof on the "revenge and retribution" threats fromTrump. 

 

Maybe you and your pals here confuse enforcing laws as revenge.

 

It should come as no surprise America is destructing under Biden thanks to more than 80M morons that voted for him.

 

You as well and as usual have NOTHING.

Clueless. Perhaps you should change your source for news.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rudi49jr said:


Maybe you forgot already, but on June 11 you already asked me for proof on the revenge and retribution threats from Trump. And I replied with several links. Did you not see that? Or do you not want to see that?

 

ADEA7F57-0C61-4838-A490-6908BEA92FE6.jpeg

21442E8C-2C89-4C47-88BA-6548E7C5138A.jpeg

Typical MAGA trolling m.o. to never take into account the replies to their posts and ask exactly the same question or make exactly the same claim a few hours or days later......

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2024 at 5:30 PM, EVENKEEL said:

That bold statement deserves a link. At least you admit a border wall is needed.

OOH, you caught him there, LOL.

 

How many times since Trump lost have we heard Trump haters say that a wall doesn't work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Irish star claims that it was a political move. A move designed to get votes or appeal to his base or both. Whatever the truth of that claim, how does it show that Irish star admits "a border wall is needed."?

 

image.png.bdcb546ac6a4c95e0817c96ea923b477.png

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2024 at 6:28 AM, EVENKEEL said:

You actually read it, funny. Ole 88 usually just rambles.

 

i stopped reading after the d day bs. the poster completely neglected to mention that the speech biden gave on d day was mostly plagiarized. cute that the media called it channeling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

 Irish star claims that it was a political move. A move designed to get votes or appeal to his base or both. Whatever the truth of that claim, how does it show that Irish star admits "a border wall is needed."?

 

image.png.bdcb546ac6a4c95e0817c96ea923b477.png


The German language has an excellent word for that: ‘hineininterpretieren’.

 

Unfortunately it’s rather untranslatable. It more or less means to read or hear something, and then attach your own interpretation to it. Which is often quite different from what the writer/speaker actually meant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Which isn't hard to do, considering what a shambles their leader is, IMO.

Completely different from what the Republicans are doing. Following a criminal leader and doing anything they can to make the dems look bad. Too bad they aren't trying to make our lives better. I'd vote for them if they did.

 

In the end. Both sides are messed up.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Which isn't hard to do, considering what a shambles their leader is, IMO.

The Republican party at it's finest. 😝

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/georgia-2nd-district-gop-runoff-jan-6-rioter-chuck-hand-rcna157221

 

Hand walked out of a debate earlier this month with Johnson not long after a former candidate in the race, Michael Nixon, brought up the criminal history of his wife, Mandy Robinson-Hand, who was his co-defendant in his Jan. 6 case. As federal prosecutors noted in their 2023 sentencing memo in her Jan. 6 case, Robinson-Hand was previously convicted in 2008 of possession of oxycodone with intent to distribute and use of a communication facility in committing a felony. In his Jan. 6 case, Hand admitted that he "broke off a piece of metal fencing and placed it in his back pants pocket" as rioters fought with police on the west front of the U.S. Capitol. Inside the Capitol, he admitted that he saw rioters fighting with officers and "moved towards the altercation," but that his wife pulled him away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...