Jump to content

Outrage as Manhattan DA Drops Charges Against Columbia University Anti-Israel Protesters


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png.39de1d0a4b92f550381451c6bc9779a6.png

 

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office announced on Thursday that nearly all protesters charged with storming and occupying Columbia University’s campus during anti-Israel demonstrations will not face criminal charges. This decision has sparked outrage among law enforcement officials, higher education authorities, and Jewish advocates.

 

In a dramatic NYPD raid on April 30, protesters were rounded up at Columbia University's Morningside Heights campus, resulting in charges against 46 individuals for trespassing in Hamilton Hall. However, the DA's office dismissed cases against 31 of these individuals, citing insufficient evidence, such as security footage, to tie them directly to the building's takeover.

 

Michael Nussbaum, a member of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, expressed his frustration, stating, "This is turnstile justice. This is a green light for chaos, a green light for destroying property." The decision has been seen as undermining the severity of the incident and potentially encouraging similar actions in the future.

 

Assistant District Attorney Stephen Millan explained that the prosecution faced significant challenges due to "extremely limited" video surveillance. During the police raid, cameras inside Hamilton Hall were covered, making it difficult to prove any damage or specific misconduct by individuals. Additionally, the protesters wore masks, complicating identification efforts.

 

Millan also noted that none of the individuals whose charges were dropped had a criminal history, and the involvement of Columbia, Barnard, or Union Theological Seminary students and staff in the protests influenced the decision. These individuals face potential disciplinary action from their respective institutions.

 

Among those whose charges were dropped is Aidan Parisi, a 27-year-old postgraduate student in social work at Columbia. However, James Carlson, considered a "possible leader" of the protests, remains charged with hate crime, assault, and petit larceny. Carlson allegedly torched an Israel supporter’s flag and hit the individual with a rock during an April demonstration. He is also accused of destroying a camera inside a holding cell at One Police Plaza. Carlson's attorney, Moira Meltzer-Cohen, has disputed the validity of these allegations.

 

Prosecutors informed 14 other individuals, including 12 unaffiliated with the Ivy League school, that their cases would be dismissed under certain conditions. Defense attorney Matthew W. Daloisio argued for immediate dismissal, emphasizing that no one was harmed or property damaged.

 

The decision to drop charges has been met with disbelief and anger from several police sources. One officer questioned the adequacy of body-worn camera footage as evidence, while another veteran cop criticized the DA's actions as giving protesters a mandate to escalate their behavior.

 

Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, a former trustee on the governing board for CUNY, criticized the inability to identify any individuals involved in the protests. "How can it be that you can’t identify a single person? It’s not acceptable and it’s not good for the city," Wiesenfeld stated.

 

This incident highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement and judicial systems in dealing with large-scale protests and the need for clear and effective evidence to pursue criminal charges. The decision by DA Bragg’s office underscores the complexity of balancing legal standards of proof with public demands for accountability and justice.

 

 

Credit: NYP 2024-06-22

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

"During the police raid, cameras inside Hamilton Hall were covered, making it difficult to prove any damage or specific misconduct by individuals."

So no proof, therefore no case.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Social Media said:

image.png.39de1d0a4b92f550381451c6bc9779a6.png

 

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office announced on Thursday that nearly all protesters charged with storming and occupying Columbia University’s campus during anti-Israel demonstrations will not face criminal charges. This decision has sparked outrage among law enforcement officials, higher education authorities, and Jewish advocates.

 

In a dramatic NYPD raid on April 30, protesters were rounded up at Columbia University's Morningside Heights campus, resulting in charges against 46 individuals for trespassing in Hamilton Hall. However, the DA's office dismissed cases against 31 of these individuals, citing insufficient evidence, such as security footage, to tie them directly to the building's takeover.

 

Michael Nussbaum, a member of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, expressed his frustration, stating, "This is turnstile justice. This is a green light for chaos, a green light for destroying property." The decision has been seen as undermining the severity of the incident and potentially encouraging similar actions in the future.

 

Assistant District Attorney Stephen Millan explained that the prosecution faced significant challenges due to "extremely limited" video surveillance. During the police raid, cameras inside Hamilton Hall were covered, making it difficult to prove any damage or specific misconduct by individuals. Additionally, the protesters wore masks, complicating identification efforts.

 

Millan also noted that none of the individuals whose charges were dropped had a criminal history, and the involvement of Columbia, Barnard, or Union Theological Seminary students and staff in the protests influenced the decision. These individuals face potential disciplinary action from their respective institutions.

 

Among those whose charges were dropped is Aidan Parisi, a 27-year-old postgraduate student in social work at Columbia. However, James Carlson, considered a "possible leader" of the protests, remains charged with hate crime, assault, and petit larceny. Carlson allegedly torched an Israel supporter’s flag and hit the individual with a rock during an April demonstration. He is also accused of destroying a camera inside a holding cell at One Police Plaza. Carlson's attorney, Moira Meltzer-Cohen, has disputed the validity of these allegations.

 

Prosecutors informed 14 other individuals, including 12 unaffiliated with the Ivy League school, that their cases would be dismissed under certain conditions. Defense attorney Matthew W. Daloisio argued for immediate dismissal, emphasizing that no one was harmed or property damaged.

 

The decision to drop charges has been met with disbelief and anger from several police sources. One officer questioned the adequacy of body-worn camera footage as evidence, while another veteran cop criticized the DA's actions as giving protesters a mandate to escalate their behavior.

 

Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, a former trustee on the governing board for CUNY, criticized the inability to identify any individuals involved in the protests. "How can it be that you can’t identify a single person? It’s not acceptable and it’s not good for the city," Wiesenfeld stated.

 

This incident highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement and judicial systems in dealing with large-scale protests and the need for clear and effective evidence to pursue criminal charges. The decision by DA Bragg’s office underscores the complexity of balancing legal standards of proof with public demands for accountability and justice.

 

 

Credit: NYP 2024-06-22

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Good call by Bragg. Although they shouldn't have been charged at all. Trespassing, but no evidence? What nonsense.

It's not difficult to see by who is foaming at the mouth what's going on here. Suppression of free speech, of protests against Israel.

Remember that NY deputy police chief, showing proudly a very strong bicycle chain lock as proof of outside organizers of the protests? Clowns.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It's astounding if you can keep a straight face while posting that. 

 

They have prosecuted J6'ers years after the event, chasing them down by cell phone pings.  Just for being there.  Some went out of bounds and needed prosecution, but others just walked in the doors being held open by cops.

 

This is exactly why most of the country sees a dual system of justice and why they're going to vote for a felon.  And lefty heads are going to explode when it happens.

 

 


A dem convicted felon! 

 

bragg & ex Doj Colangelo go before the house in July ! If the Gop could only find a prosecutor instead of Jordan , to question the 2  Dem’s.

 

 

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2024/06/11/bragg--colangelo-set-to-appear-before-congress-in-july-trump

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, impulse said:

Goll dang.  Even Judge Judy is calling out this nonsense:

 

Judge Judy Unloads On Alvin Bragg For Trying Trump Over ‘Nonsense’ Instead Of Keeping Criminals ‘Off The Street’

 

https://dailycaller.com/2024/06/21/judge-judy-unloads-alvin-bragg-donald-trump/

Why "Even Judge Judy"? Has she been a prominent advocate for robust protection of civil liberties?

 

"Judge Judy is an American arbitration-based reality court show presided over by former Manhattan Family Court Judge Judith Sheindlin."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Judy

Wow! Family court. Such a distinguished career.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, riclag said:

I watched that promo!

The little weasel Chris Wallace wasn’t expecting her response about bragg!

 

I dont think the international leftist 

here know who she is!

Given her undistinguished judicial record, it's clear you don't either.

  • Sad 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

It's astounding if you can keep a straight face while posting that. 

 

They have prosecuted J6'ers years after the event, chasing them down by cell phone pings.  Just for being there.  Some went out of bounds and needed prosecution, but others just walked in the doors being held open by cops.

 

This is exactly why most of the country sees a dual system of justice and why they're going to vote for a felon.  And lefty heads are going to explode when it happens.

 

 

The J6'ers attempted to interfere with a constitutionally prescribed transfer of power. That was a crime against the Constitution of the United States. And a lot of them actually posted footage to the internet. And the Capitol is heavily monitored with cameras.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Got a link to share it with the rest of us?

Yea, the OP plus dozens more on youtube 🤣

  • Love It 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea, the OP plus dozens more on youtube 🤣

No recognizable individuals damaging property.

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, stevenl said:

No recognizable individuals damaging property.

Since when has trespassing not been a crime, 46 of them were arrested and charged with it.

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea, the OP plus dozens more on youtube 🤣

Really? Have you actually watched the video posted here? I doubt there was even a minute of footage of Columbia students What felonies were being committed by identifiable students? And if there are, are any of them still being prosecuted?

Got a link to any of those dozens on youtube that show students who are not currently being prosecuted committing felonies? 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, placeholder said:

Really? Have you actually watched the video posted here? I doubt there was even a minute of footage of Columbia students What felonies were being committed by identifiable students? And if there are, are any of them still being prosecuted?

Got a link to any of those dozens on youtube that show students who are not currently being prosecuted committing felonies? 

Yes, I watched it, I tell you what, every time you want to watch another I will post one for you, all you need to do is respond. 

 

Body camera video shows NYPD entering building at Columbia University

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpcd-RVtoSQ

 

  • Love It 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea, the OP plus dozens more on youtube 🤣

It's maybe hard to grasp for you, but you need actual evidence to prosecute someone.

Your hatred alone doesn't cut it.

Btw, actual evidence is why Israel (and Hamas) will be prosecuted for war crimes. Unless Biden bullies the the ICJ even more than usual.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, Presto said:

It's maybe hard to grasp for you, but you need actual evidence to prosecute someone.

Your hatred alone doesn't cut it.

Btw, actual evidence is why Israel (and Hamas) will be prosecuted for war crimes. Unless Biden bullies the the ICJ even more than usual.

Do they hate the 13 whose charges have not been dropped?

  • Love It 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yes, I watched it, I tell you what, every time you want to watch another I will post one for you, all you need to do is respond. 

 

Body camera video shows NYPD entering building at Columbia University

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xpcd-RVtoSQ

 

You might as well have showed me a family birthday party given that the clip you provided offers nothing in the way of proof. If this is typical, then you've got nothing.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...