.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
0
Met Police Officers Reinstated After Appeal Over Bianca Williams Stop and Search Incident
Two former Metropolitan Police officers, Jonathan Clapham and Sam Franks, have won their appeal to be reinstated after being dismissed last October over their involvement in the controversial stop and search of British athlete Bianca Williams and her partner, Olympic sprinter Ricardo Dos Santos. The Police Appeals Tribunal overturned the previous ruling, which had found the officers guilty of lying about smelling cannabis during the stop, deeming the initial decision “irrational” and “inconsistent.” As for Williams, she has continued her athletic career with great success. At the Paris Olympics this summer, she was part of the British women’s 4x100m relay team, which not only qualified for the final but went on to win a silver medal, a significant achievement in her sporting career. Based on a report from The Independent 2024-10-05 -
0
Yazidi Woman Rescued from Gaza After Years of Captivity Following ISIS Kidnapping
A Yazidi woman named Fawzia Amin Sido, who was kidnapped by ISIS at the age of 11 and trafficked to the Gaza Strip, has been reunited with her family in Iraq. Her abduction occurred in 2014 when ISIS forces launched brutal attacks on Yazidi communities in Iraq, seizing control of large areas of the country. During this chaos, Sido was taken from her family and sold to a Gazan man who happened to be in Iraq at the time. According to Israel's foreign ministry, Israeli security forces played a significant role in her extraction from Gaza. The operation was described as complex and involved the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), and the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, in coordination with other international parties. In a statement, the IDF disclosed that Sido's captor, identified as a terrorist, had been killed in an Israeli strike during the recent fighting in Gaza, allowing her to flee to a hiding spot. After days of evasion, she was rescued through the Kerem Shalom crossing into Israel. From there, she was transported to Jordan via the Allenby Crossing before being reunited with her family in Iraq. The IDF emphasized that the incident provided further proof of the connections between Hamas and ISIS, and underscored the crimes against humanity carried out by these groups. The Iraqi Foreign Ministry also issued a statement about Sido’s release, thanking the joint efforts of U.S. embassies in Baghdad and Amman, along with Jordanian authorities. However, no mention of Israeli involvement was made in their announcement. A U.S. State Department spokesperson confirmed that the U.S. had helped safely evacuate Sido from Gaza, describing her as a young Yazidi woman who had been kidnapped from Iraq and trafficked to Gaza. Her captor’s recent death made her escape and repatriation possible. Steve Maman, a Jewish philanthropist who has been referred to as the “Jewish Schindler” for his work in helping rescue Yazidis, shared a video of Sido reuniting with her family. Maman wrote on social media, “I made a promise to Fawzia the Yazidi who was hostage of Hamas in Gaza that I would bring her back home to her mother in Sinjar. To her, it seemed surreal and impossible but not to me, my only enemy was time. Our team reunited her moments ago with her mother and family in Sinjar.” David Saranga, Director of the Foreign Ministry’s Digital Diplomacy Bureau, also commented on her release, stating: “For years, she was held captive by a Palestinian Hamas-ISIS member. Her story is a reminder of the brutality faced by Yazidi children, taken without a choice.” Sido’s rescue marks the end of a long and harrowing chapter in her life, one that highlights the suffering of the Yazidi community at the hands of ISIS and the brutalities endured by those taken captive during the conflict. Based on a report from BBC | Sky | X 2024-10-05 -
0
Moldova Accuses Russia of Voter Bribery to Block EU Integration
Moldova is warning of a sophisticated scheme orchestrated by Russia to sway its upcoming elections and referendum by paying citizens to vote against closer ties with the European Union. According to top Moldovan officials, a mafia-style network has been built by Moscow, funneling cash to influence voters in a crucial decision on the country’s future. Viorel Cernăuțeanu, Moldova's chief of police, told POLITICO on Thursday, “Moldova is facing a phenomenon of voter bribery, combined with hybrid warfare and disinformation, the likes of which our country has never seen before.” He explained that the plot involves over $15 million in Russian funds, which have been funneled into the accounts of more than 130,000 Moldovan citizens in just the last month. This alarming development has led authorities to hold a press conference to expose the details of Russia’s plan. At the center of this operation is Ilan Shor, a pro-Russian oligarch who founded the now-banned Shor Party. Authorities claim Shor has been using his network of banks to launder the money intended for voter bribes. Local activists, backed by Russian coordinators, have reportedly been distributing cash to Moldovans via the messaging platform Telegram. Cernăuțeanu said, “This ‘mafia-style’ network, orchestrated from Moscow, aims to influence voters ahead of the presidential elections and EU referendum.” The stakes are high as the referendum on October 20 will determine whether Moldova strengthens its ties with the West by joining the EU, while the simultaneous election pits pro-Western President Maia Sandu against pro-Russian opposition figures. Despite being declared unconstitutional last year, Shor’s political party continues to play a pivotal role in the Kremlin’s efforts to keep Moldova from moving closer to the EU. These revelations come at a critical moment, just as Moldova’s national security adviser, Stanislav Secrieru, warned of Russia’s increasing interference. Secrieru told POLITICO that Russia has launched an “unprecedented onslaught” of propaganda and intimidation ahead of the referendum. He predicted that Moscow would spend around €100 million this year alone to manipulate Moldova’s democratic processes. Moldova, granted EU candidate status in June 2022, has begun accession talks with the bloc. However, Russia continues to wield significant influence over the country, not only through its control over energy supplies but also through its penetration of Moldova’s state institutions. Last summer, Ukrainian intelligence reported a Russian-funded plot to overthrow Sandu’s government, with Ilan Shor named as the key player in the alleged coup. Shor has since been sanctioned by the EU. In response to these escalating threats, the EU has deployed a civilian mission to Moldova aimed at bolstering the country’s defenses against Russia’s hybrid warfare tactics. A senior Moldovan official, speaking anonymously, emphasized the importance of cooperating with Brussels to counter Russia’s interference. “We are learning important lessons as we defend our democracy in this electoral cycle—lessons the EU can also benefit from as they will likely face similar, but more refined, tactics in the future,” the official said. As Moldova prepares for this pivotal vote, the extent of Russian influence over the country’s democratic processes has never been clearer. Based on a report from Politico 2024-10-04 -
0
Melania Trump Praises Donald Trump in Rare TV Interview With Fox
In a rare and candid interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Melania Trump offered a glimpse into her life with former President Donald Trump, while voicing strong support for her husband. The former first lady, typically private, was uncharacteristically open as she discussed Donald Trump’s political journey, their shared experiences, and the current state of the nation. Melania sat down with Hannity, her long-time friend, as part of a promotional tour for her upcoming book, *Melania*. The conversation comes amid renewed public interest in the Trumps, especially as the former president ramps up his campaign for the 2024 presidential race. In the interview, Melania praised her husband’s leadership and spoke about their life in the political spotlight. Dressed in a white suit and black blouse, Melania reflected on the lengthy and often unpredictable nature of politics. “You just need to be in it and enjoy it as much as you can,” she said, stressing the importance of staying focused while also being prepared for unexpected developments. She noted how she remained calm during the tense Election Day of 2020. “That’s maybe my personality,” she shared. “I know on Election Day it’s all in people’s hands, people decide what they want for this country, and it will be again this year on November 5th.” Melania revealed that when Donald first confided in her about his intention to enter politics, she was immediately supportive. “You’re going to win,” she told him, confident in his ability to connect with people. “I saw how people react to him, and his passion for this country,” she explained. “We traveled all around the world, and I saw what the people want. I think the country was ready for a change, they wanted to have somebody that wasn’t in politics all the time.” Reflecting on the current political landscape, Melania noted the deep divisions plaguing the nation. “The world, and especially the United States, is more divided than ever before,” she observed. She emphasized the importance of open dialogue, urging both Republicans and Democrats to listen to one another. “We need to respect our freedom of speech, our individuality,” she said. “It’s troubling... in this country that we are cancelling people that they don’t agree [with] on certain issues.” Throughout the interview, Melania remained steadfast in her defense of her husband. She criticized the media for what she described as biased coverage during his presidency and beyond. “I saw how they treated him, how the media was against him,” she said, arguing that they were intimidated by his strength as a leader. “As soon as he announced that he’s running for the presidency, everything really changed... this will not be very pleasant.” Melania expressed a sense of resilience despite the challenges. “I always said to him, ‘What is next?’ So in one way, you’re not surprised, and every event that happened, I’m thinking, ‘What is next, what are they trying to do?’ And you always fear the worst.” Though she didn’t delve into specific controversies surrounding her husband, her words reflected a loyal partnership and a belief in his vision for the country. This rare interview shed light on Melania Trump’s views and her enduring support for Donald Trump as he navigates both his personal and political battles. Based on a report from Daily Beast 2024-10-04 -
0
China’s Military Expansion and America’s Defense Deficiency
As geopolitical tensions rise, there is growing concern that the United States may be unprepared to face a significant military challenge from China. Although much of the discourse in Washington has focused on China’s economic struggles—such as high youth unemployment, an aging population, and slow economic growth—these issues have not hindered Beijing’s ability to ramp up its defense capabilities. While some believe that China’s military might is exaggerated, the reality tells a different story. China's defense industrial base is rapidly expanding, and the country has taken a wartime stance in its production of weapons and military technology. Despite its economic challenges, China has been making remarkable progress in the development and production of sophisticated military hardware. Over the past few years, China has outpaced the U.S. in several critical areas, including shipbuilding and missile production. It has become the world’s largest shipbuilder, with production capacity 230 times larger than that of the United States. Between 2021 and early 2024, China’s defense industry produced over 400 modern fighter aircraft, more than 20 warships, and doubled its missile and nuclear warhead inventories. The pace at which China is acquiring weapons systems is five to six times faster than the United States. Admiral John Aquilino, former commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, has described China’s military buildup as “the most extensive and rapid since World War II.” At the heart of China’s defense strategy is President Xi Jinping’s vision of creating a world-class military to fulfill his goal of the "great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation." State-owned enterprises have been key players in building China’s military capacity, with companies like Aviation Industry Corporation of China and China State Shipbuilding now ranking among the largest defense companies in the world. In just over a decade, Chinese firms have gone from being absent in global defense rankings to becoming top competitors of U.S. defense giants like Lockheed Martin and Boeing. One of the most striking examples of China's military advancements is its naval power. The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) is now the largest in the world, supported by China’s vast shipbuilding infrastructure. China’s shipyards can produce warships, submarines, and other military vessels at a scale that far surpasses U.S. capacity. While the U.S. Navy still maintains an edge in some areas—such as firepower and advanced nuclear-powered submarines—China’s ability to produce ships rapidly gives it a potential advantage in a prolonged conflict. In addition to naval advancements, China has been modernizing its air force and missile capabilities. Its Aviation Industry Corporation has doubled its production of fourth- and fifth-generation fighter jets in recent years and continues to improve the country’s drone technology and missile systems. China is also making strides in space technology, increasing its number of satellite launches and developing systems that can track and disrupt enemy assets in space. While China continues its military expansion, the United States finds itself facing significant challenges in maintaining its defense superiority. The U.S. defense industrial base has atrophied over the years, lacking the flexibility and capacity needed to match China’s rapid growth. The current U.S. defense production system is better suited for peacetime operations, and crucial bottlenecks in munitions and equipment could leave the U.S. at a disadvantage in a protracted conflict, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region. Despite these challenges, the United States has yet to take the necessary steps to overhaul its defense industry. To counter China’s growing threat, Washington needs to address labor shortages in critical sectors like shipbuilding, streamline its contracting and acquisition processes, and invest in new technologies. A presidential-led initiative, akin to Franklin Roosevelt’s World War II “arsenal of democracy” effort, may be required to revitalize America’s defense industry. China’s defense buildup is a warning sign. To ensure its readiness for potential future conflicts, the United States must act quickly to rebuild its military capabilities and safeguard its position on the global stage. Based on a report from Foreign Affairs 2024-10-05 -
0
Bruce Springsteen's Call to Action: Endorsing Harris, Criticizing Trump
Bruce Springsteen, known as "The Boss" for his influential role in American rock music, has thrown his support behind the 2024 Democratic ticket, offering an impassioned endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz. In a video shared on Instagram, Springsteen, who is 75, expressed the importance of the upcoming election, which he described as “one of the most consequential elections in our nation’s history.” In the video, Springsteen enumerated what he believes are the fundamental values that "make America great." Beyond its military and economic power, Springsteen highlighted qualities like "freedom, social justice, equal opportunity, and the right to be and love who you want" as the true pillars of American greatness. A consistent supporter of Democratic candidates over the years, Springsteen’s endorsement was not unexpected. He has previously backed John Kerry, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden, always standing firmly in the corner of the Democratic Party. Now, as the 2024 election looms, Springsteen has once again made his political leanings clear by endorsing Harris and Walz. "Everybody sees things different and I respect your choice as a fellow citizen. But like you, I’ve only got one vote. And it’s one of the most precious possessions that I have," Springsteen remarked, emphasizing the personal significance of his vote. He concluded by saying, "That’s why come Nov. 5, I’ll be casting it for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz." Interestingly, the friction between Springsteen and Trump is not new. On the campaign trail, Trump has made it clear that he is "not a huge fan" of Springsteen. In a speech delivered in Atlanta in August, Trump noted that he only tends to like people who like him, acknowledging, “I have a bad trait” in reference to the mutual lack of admiration between the two. Despite this, Springsteen remains undeterred, using his platform to rally his fans and fellow citizens to action, urging them to vote in a crucial election that could shape the future of the nation. Based on a report from NYP 2024-10-05 -
0
The Acquittal of Three Former Officers in Tyre Nichols Case Sparks Accountability Debate
Three former Memphis police officers were convicted on Thursday of federal witness tampering charges in the fatal beating of Tyre Nichols, a 29-year-old Black man. However, they were acquitted of the more severe charge of violating Nichols’s civil rights by causing his death. This mixed verdict has raised questions about accountability in policing and whether justice was truly served. The officers—Demetrius Haley, Tadarrius Bean, and Justin Smith—were part of a specialized unit within the Memphis Police Department when the tragic incident occurred in January 2023. In addition to the federal charges, they, along with two other officers who had already pleaded guilty, still face state charges, including second-degree murder. Demetrius Haley was also convicted of violating Nichols’s civil rights by causing bodily injury. Tyre Nichols’s death shocked the nation, particularly given the disturbing video evidence of the incident. After Nichols fled from a traffic stop, the officers pursued him, ultimately beating him while he cried out for his mother and tried to comply with conflicting commands. The brutal encounter, captured on both body cameras and surveillance footage, showed officers viciously punching and kicking Nichols before propping him against a police car, where he was left without medical aid for several minutes. None of the officers reported the full extent of the violence that occurred that night. The trial, which spanned 17 days, offered a glimpse into a deeply troubling culture within the Memphis Police Department, where violence and secrecy appeared to be tolerated. Prosecutors highlighted how officers on the Scorpion street crime unit, where the defendants served, seemed to operate under an unspoken agreement to use excessive force against those who fled and then downplay the violence. In her closing statement, Kathryn Gilbert, a Justice Department lawyer, emphasized the clear evidence captured on video, urging the jury to rely on their common sense in assessing the officers’ actions: "You know what these officers did and know it because you saw it over and over again." Throughout the trial, federal prosecutors summoned both former and current Memphis police officers, along with medical staff who had treated Nichols after the beating. Video footage was played repeatedly, showing not just the violence but also the officers’ casual conversations afterward. In one of the most compelling moments of the trial, two officers who had previously pleaded guilty testified against their former colleagues, identifying their voices and detailing violations of police protocol as they watched the footage. One of the testifying officers, Emmitt Martin III, recounted his anger when Nichols managed to break free from their grip, admitting to an unspoken pact among the officers not to disclose the full brutality of their actions to their superiors. "I knew they weren’t going to tell on me," he said. "And I wasn’t going to tell on them." Desmond Mills Jr., the other officer who testified, became emotional while watching the videos, confessing to his role in beating Nichols with a baton and delivering a powerful kick to his limp body. Overcome with remorse, Mills tearfully stated, "I made his child fatherless. I’m sorry." Prosecutors recommended significant prison sentences for both men—up to 40 years for Martin and up to 15 years for Mills. For Nichols’s family, who kept a vigil throughout the trial, the legal proceedings were a painful ordeal. His mother, RowVaughn Wells, often left the courtroom to avoid watching the harrowing footage or sat quietly as her husband shielded her from the images of their son’s body. Lawyers for the defendants attempted to build separate cases for each client, casting doubt on the training the officers received and their level of responsibility for Nichols’s death. They sought to redirect blame toward Martin and Mills, but the prosecution’s case was strongest against Haley, who had a reputation for aggressive behavior and had previously been involved in using excessive force. Haley was also caught on video delivering a vicious kick to Nichols and had sent a disturbing image of Nichols’s bloodied body to a former girlfriend. Although Haley’s defense acknowledged his role in the beating, they argued that his actions fell within the scope of police training and that his words, such as calling to "beat that man," were not necessarily sinister. Despite the convictions for witness tampering, broader questions remain unanswered about the future of policing in Memphis, a city still grappling with high crime rates and the use of excessive force by its police department. While some have expressed hope for change, others remain skeptical, especially given the Republican-dominated state legislature’s reluctance to embrace police reform and the ongoing investigation by the Justice Department. Michael Sierra-Arévalo, a sociologist and professor at the University of Texas at Austin, voiced the skepticism many share: "This is accountability, not justice. Justice would be a system that doesn’t so reliably hurt the people that it’s meant to protect." As sentencing looms in January, Nichols’s death remains a powerful reminder of the challenges of achieving true justice and reform in policing. Based on a report from NYT 2024-10-05 -
0
Iran's Nuclear Ambitions and Israel's Growing Concern
In recent weeks, tensions have heightened as Israel grows increasingly anxious about Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, learned a hard lesson about the limits of his foreign policy strategy. Despite having well-armed and well-trained proxy forces like Hezbollah, these surrogates can falter when faced with the might of a modern, determined army. The recent Israeli offensives in Gaza and Lebanon demonstrated this when many high-ranking Hezbollah members, including Hassan Nasrallah, were killed. This loss, alongside Israel's successful dismantling of Hezbollah’s capabilities, left Tehran scrambling to regain face. Tehran’s response was a failed ballistic missile attack on Israel, an attempt to restore dignity after its top proxy had been severely weakened. Iran has long employed proxies like Hezbollah to carry out its agenda, using them to spread its influence and attack enemies while shielding itself from direct retaliation. However, Israel’s rapid dismantling of Hezbollah’s missile systems and crews has shown the clerical regime that proxy forces alone are insufficient for maintaining its influence in the region. Moreover, Iran’s reliance on ballistic and cruise missiles as a deterrent has also come under strain. Despite its heavy investment in these conventional weapons, Israel's air defenses have proven capable of neutralizing many of these attacks. With its proxies under attack and its missile strategy losing effectiveness, Iran may be closer than ever to considering the development of a nuclear weapon as its ultimate guarantee of security and regional influence. This rising threat has Israel on edge. Many in Israel fear that Iran’s missile barrages could push Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to take the ultimate step of launching a preemptive strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. This would be a last-ditch effort to prevent Tehran from acquiring the only weapon that could allow it to maneuver freely in the Middle East. While Israel’s leadership debates the severity of its response, the United States, Israel’s most crucial ally, has entered crisis-management mode. President Biden continues to seek de-escalation, although months of diplomacy have failed to yield meaningful results. Biden has expressed his opposition to an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear sites, yet he has also insisted that Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear bomb. This delicate balancing act does not easily align with calls from both political parties in the U.S. to avoid being dragged into perpetual conflicts. Despite these differing views, the strong alliance between Israel and the United States may be the last remaining obstacle to Iran’s nuclear aspirations. Israel’s recent intelligence successes, including the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, a top Hamas leader, in a Revolutionary Guards compound in Tehran, have likely given Khamenei pause. He must now question whether any secret plans to assemble a nuclear bomb would leak, leading to a preemptive strike by Israel or the U.S. Nevertheless, Iran may still see reasons for optimism in the post-October 7 Middle East. While Israel has dealt severe blows to its proxies, Hamas and Hezbollah are likely to survive. Additionally, the current conflict has derailed the possibility of Saudi-Israeli normalization, along with a potential U.S.-Saudi defense alliance that would have been a significant threat to Tehran. The deaths of tens of thousands of Palestinians have also led Saudi and Emirati royals, once vocal opponents of Iran, to adopt a more conciliatory tone toward Tehran. Should Iran successfully test a nuclear weapon in the near future, the balance of power in the region would shift dramatically. It would weaken both Israel’s and America’s influence in the Middle East overnight. Historically, the U.S. has never attacked a nuclear-armed state, and Israel, widely believed to possess its own nuclear weapons, would likely face significant restrictions in engaging with a nuclear-armed Iran. The doctrine of mutually assured destruction would, in fact, limit Israel more than Iran. For Ayatollah Khamenei, becoming a nuclear state would provide a new means to project power domestically and internationally. It would also neutralize the risk that another attack on Israel would lead to a conventional conflict in which Iran cannot compete. In authoritarian regimes, maintaining an image of strength is crucial, and foreign defeats can have domestic consequences. Khamenei understands this well, and a nuclear Iran could reshape not only the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East but also the internal dynamics of his theocratic rule. Based on a report from NYT 2024-10-04 -
0
Tim Walz's Verbal Missteps Stir Concerns Amid Tight Campaign
Tim Walz, Minnesota's plain-speaking governor and Kamala Harris' running mate, is grappling with a growing number of public misstatements that could potentially harm their tight race against Donald Trump and JD Vance. Known for his folksy, candid communication style, Walz has found himself repeatedly clarifying or correcting statements about his past, from his military service to personal anecdotes about his family. His campaign has been forced to address these verbal missteps, leading to speculation on whether they may undercut his credibility with voters. Walz's most recent gaffe occurred during a CBS debate, when he was pressed on a claim about being in Hong Kong during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests. Walz had previously stated that he was in Hong Kong during the protests in Beijing. When confronted during the debate, Walz awkwardly admitted, "I got there that summer," adding, "I’m a knucklehead at times," before conceding he had "misspoke." A day later, he sought to clarify the situation further, saying, "Yeah, look, I have my dates wrong. I was in Hong Kong in China in 1989. … I speak like everybody else speaks. I need to be clearer." "I need to be clearer" Walz’s past DUI arrest in Nebraska, which was downplayed in previous campaigns, also resurfaced during Harris' vice presidential vetting process. Harris' team was aware of the arrest and investigated Walz’s behavior since then, including his temperament and drinking habits. Despite these controversies, Walz’s supporters remain steadfast in their admiration for him. Bob Frisby, a 70-year-old resident of Rochester, Minnesota, expressed his trust in the governor, stating, "He’s just honest." However, Republicans have been quick to exploit these moments, drawing attention to his misstatements as a way to undermine his image as an "everyday Midwest guy." Defending her running mate, a spokesperson for the Harris-Walz campaign explained that Walz "speaks like a normal person" and "passionately about issues he cares deeply about," including democracy and gun violence. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders like Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker have urged voters to consider the broader picture, stating, "You can pick and choose the things that you want over somebody’s entire career and call it out," while reminding them that "JD Vance is lying every day." Based on a report from Politico 2024-10-05 -
0
Kim Jong Un Warns of Nuclear Retaliation Against South Korea
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has issued a stern warning, stating that his country would not hesitate to deploy its full military arsenal, including nuclear weapons, if its sovereignty is threatened. The statement was reported by North Korea’s state news agency KCNA on Friday, reflecting escalating tensions between North and South Korea. Kim's comments were a direct response to remarks made by South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol during an event marking South Korea’s Armed Forces Day. Yoon had warned that any use of nuclear weapons by Pyongyang would lead to "a resolute, overwhelming response" from both South Korea and its ally, the United States. “That day will see the end of the North Korean regime,” Yoon said during the event, which also featured a military parade showcasing South Korea's ballistic missile capabilities and a flyover by a U.S. bomber. Kim Jong Un criticized Yoon's statements, asserting that they demonstrated who was truly responsible for destabilizing regional peace and security. According to KCNA, Kim remarked that Yoon “bragged about overwhelming counteraction of military muscle at the doorstep of the state possessed of nuclear weapons.” He went on to describe Yoon’s behavior as "a great irony that caused the suspicion of being an abnormal man." In his address, Kim reiterated that North Korea's military strength remained unshaken by external threats. “If the enemy, seized with extreme foolishness and recklessness, attempt to use armed forces encroaching upon the sovereignty of the DPRK, the DPRK would use without hesitation all the offensive forces it has possessed, including nuclear weapons,” he said. DPRK stands for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the official name of North Korea. The KCNA report indicated that Kim delivered his remarks during a visit to a training base for special operation units within North Korea’s army on Wednesday. North Korea has long pursued a nuclear weapons program, conducting six underground nuclear tests over the years. It is believed to possess enough materials to build dozens of nuclear weapons, making its threats a serious concern for the region and the international community. Kim emphasized that the threats from South Korea and its allies would not deter his country's military development. “The enemies’ threatening rhetoric, action, trick and attempt did not check the DPRK’s powerful military strength and will not take away our nuclear weapons forever,” KCNA quoted him as saying. Based on a report from NBC News 2024-10-05 -
0
Keir Starmer’s EU Reset: A Strategy Built on Falsehoods
Keir Starmer’s proposal to reset the UK’s relationship with the European Union has raised significant concerns, with critics arguing that his strategy is unlikely to secure a better deal for Britain. Labour’s willingness to offer concessions in exchange for a more cordial atmosphere and an annual summit with the EU evokes memories of post-Brexit negotiations. Much like in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum, British emissaries are traveling to Brussels for discussions, facing familiar criticisms of the UK's negotiating tactics. The UK's expectations are being met with disdain behind closed doors, as the EU sets preconditions on topics of interest before Britain can address its own concerns. There are even rumors of a return for Olly Robbins, who played a prominent role in Theresa May’s Brexit negotiations, further deepening the sense of déjà vu. The fear surrounding Starmer’s plan to “reset” relations with the EU stems from Labour’s perceived naivety about international diplomacy. The EU has a vested interest in drawing Britain into a series of one-sided concessions, and they are skilled negotiators who can achieve that goal. Unsurprisingly, Starmer has expressed his desire to avoid a “running commentary” on the negotiations and hopes for a “respectful” tone. By keeping the details hidden, it appears he is attempting to avoid shedding light on the substance of the talks. At the start of any negotiation, it is crucial to have a clear understanding of what is in the national interest and what can be conceded to achieve those objectives. However, it seems Starmer may not be applying this necessary level of scrutiny. Labour’s stated goals are to “reset” relations, reduce “friction,” secure a foreign policy and security agreement, and establish a food and veterinary arrangement. Yet, the first two goals are merely matters of tone, easily achieved by conceding significant points to improve the atmosphere, as was the case during negotiations under Theresa May and Rishi Sunak. Securing a foreign policy agreement benefits the EU more than the UK, given that Britain is already allied with most EU member states through NATO. Such an agreement could bind Britain to dealing with foreign policy through EU channels, enabling the EU to set terms for military procurement and drawing the UK into supporting the EU’s own military ambitions. These plans, recently criticized by NATO’s outgoing secretary general, seem to offer little benefit to Britain. The necessity of a food and veterinary agreement is similarly unclear, as unprocessed agricultural exports make up only 0.5 percent of the UK's total exports, and most exporters have already adapted to post-Brexit trade rules. While the EU may seek to make Britain a captive market for its more expensive food products, it is not apparent why this would benefit the UK. Labour’s approach seems likely to involve conceding on these issues without securing valuable returns. The EU has made it clear that topics such as foreign policy and food standards cannot be discussed until Britain agrees to their demands, including a youth mobility agreement and guaranteed access to British fishing waters. The idea of allowing further EU access to UK fishing grounds should be a non-starter, yet Labour’s willingness to negotiate raises concerns. The youth mobility agreement on offer is similarly lopsided, as it would allow young people from any EU country to work in the UK, while British youth would only gain access to one EU country. This negotiation has an odd dynamic in which Britain seems poised to make all the substantive concessions in return for little more than a better diplomatic tone and an annual summit. These gains could easily be revoked if the EU later decides to apply pressure on the UK again. Labour’s romanticized view of the EU as a progressive project obscures the realities of power politics. The party sees Brexit as a failure, and Starmer’s concessions are framed as part of the process of reintegrating Britain into the global order. However, the EU is far from the idealized institution Labour envisions. It is a community that sets aside law when it serves its agenda and is quick to pressure weaker countries. Successful negotiations with the EU require clarity, firmness, and a willingness to walk away when necessary. Unfortunately, it appears that Labour is unwilling to adopt this approach. As a result, Britain may soon find itself locked into another unfavorable deal, one that will become impossible to reverse once agreed. The time to challenge this strategy is now, before it is too late. Based on a report from Daily Telegraph 2024-10-05 -
6
can i keep 400k thb in my thai bank account and apply for the non immigration visa ?
Not for an in country Non-O based on marriage -
24
Care Homes Urged to Embrace Transgender Identities in Elderly Care
Do you have any pictures of the ladyboy wing in a Thai prison? Do you have a scrap of evidence that Thai care homes have separate wings for ladyboys? -
3,492
President Kamala Harris
The Dems are becoming increasingly desperate to win, IMO. Not surprising when considering the lemon candidate they got imposed on them, a person that never won any vote by the citizens to say that they wanted her as POTUS. As time goes by the awful truth about her becomes more and more obvious, despite them keeping her hidden as much as possible. -
3
Question for Americans using login.gov
You can pay 1040ES there, and check previous estimated payments record. Your US bank info can be saved for future payments.
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now