Jump to content

Criticism Following Robert Jenrick's Remarks on Arresting Individuals Chanting Allahu Akba


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png.9deb1fbceb1546a149439a058dd9bbc0.png

 

Controversy Erupts Over Robert Jenrick's Remarks on Arresting Individuals Chanting "Allahu Akbar." Robert Jenrick, a Tory leadership hopeful, has ignited a firestorm of criticism following his comments suggesting that individuals chanting "Allahu Akbar" on London streets should be immediately arrested. "Allahu Akbar," an Arabic phrase meaning "God is greater" or "God is [the] greatest," is commonly used in prayer and as a declaration of faith. Jenrick's remarks have drawn significant backlash from various quarters, with many accusing him of Islamophobia.

 

In an interview with Sky News, Jenrick voiced his discontent with the police's handling of recent protests. "I thought it was quite wrong that somebody could shout ‘Allahu Akbar’ on the streets of London and not be immediately arrested. Or project genocidal chants onto Big Ben and that person not be immediately arrested. That attitude is wrong and I’ll always call out the police.” His statement came in response to a recent incident where pro-Palestine protesters projected the phrase “From the river to the sea” onto Parliament, which some pro-Israel supporters interpreted as a call for the eradication of the state of Israel.

 

Jenrick later shared a video on social media showing men in balaclavas chanting "Allahu Akbar." He commented, “’Allahu Akbar’ is spoken peacefully and spiritually by millions of British Muslims in their daily lives. But the aggressive chanting below is intimidatory and threatening. And it’s an offence under Section 4 and 5 of the Public Order Act. Extremists routinely abuse common expressions for their own shameful ends. All violence must end. All violence must be called out.”

 

The Muslim Association of Britain strongly condemned Jenrick’s comments, labeling them as "pure unadulterated Islamophobia." The association argued that such rhetoric fuels Islamophobic sentiments and empowers far-right extremists. The Muslim Council echoed this sentiment, stating that Jenrick’s comments highlighted the presence of "institutional Islamophobia" within the Conservative Party. A spokesperson for the council urged Jenrick to apologize and retract his comments, suggesting he engage with Muslim communities to better understand the impact of his words.

 

Labour MP Naz Shah was among those demanding an apology from Jenrick, calling his comments "complete ignorance and textbook Islamophobia." Shah emphasized that "Allahu Akbar" is a fundamental expression of faith for Muslims, akin to Christians saying "Jesus Christ as your lord and saviour." She criticized Jenrick for potentially stigmatizing Muslims, urging him to educate himself about the Islamic faith. "Billions of us Muslims use it every day as part of our faith within our prayers. It is a common phrase like Christians would say ‘Jesus Christ as your lord and saviour’. Imagine in this climate, either being that ignorant or deliberately trying to stigmatise all Muslims. He should apologise and speak to Muslim communities and learn more about our faith.”

 

Afzal Khan, Labour MP for Manchester Rusholme, also condemned Jenrick’s remarks, comparing "Allahu Akbar" to the Christian phrase "Hallelujah" and accusing Jenrick of exposing his prejudice against Muslims. "Another day, another senior Tory being Islamophobic. Allahu Akbar means God is great - the Muslim equivalent of Hallelujah. Jenrick‘s confidence in going on national TV to say people should be arrested for saying Allahu Akbar exposes his deep-seated prejudice against Muslims.”

 

Conservative peer Baroness Sayeeda Warsi described Jenrick's rhetoric as "nasty and divisive," highlighting that parliamentary prayers also involve praising God, similar to the phrase "Allahu Akbar." "Every day before we start parliamentary business in the Commons and Lords we say a prayer and praise God - we say our Parliamentary version of Allah hu Akbars at the heart of democracy - a process Robert Jenrick is a part of.”

 

The controversy surrounding Jenrick’s comments comes amid accusations of "two-tier policing" in the UK, a claim suggesting that police treat left-wing and Islamic protesters more leniently than white working-class protesters. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has denied these claims, insisting that policing is carried out impartially.

 

When Mr Jenrick was asked about his previous claim that “we have allowed our streets to be dominated by Islamist extremists”, a comment he made in February about a government vote on a ceasefire in Israel and Gaza, the MP for Newark said: “I think I was absolutely right.” “There were instances back then when we had Islamist extremists on our streets. I’ve just given you one example, where you literally had somebody chanting, or chanting, ‘Allahu Akbar’ on Oxford Street. We saw people commending the Houthis for firing missiles at British flagged vessels in the seas. That is completely wrong. That is anti-British, we should be calling it out.”

 

Jenrick’s comments and the ensuing backlash underscore the tensions and sensitivities surrounding discussions of religious expressions and public safety. Critics argue that such statements risk alienating and stigmatizing Muslim communities, while supporters may view them as necessary for maintaining public order. As the debate continues, the need for careful and inclusive dialogue becomes ever more apparent.

 

Credit: The Independent  2024-08-08

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

 

Cigna offers a variety of health insurance plans designed to meet the minimum requirement for medical treatment coverage, with benefits reaching up to THB 3 million. These plans are tailored to provide comprehensive healthcare solutions for expatriates, ensuring peace of mind and access to quality medical services. To explore the full range of Cigna's expat health insurance options and find a plan that suits your needs, click here for more information.

  • Like 1
Posted

I remember the at the start of a flight from Penang - Phuket years ago the Captain ending his preflight address with "allah akbar, allah akbar, allah akbar".

I looked around to see the reaction in the cabin. All normal apparently.

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Social Media said:

“’Allahu Akbar’ is spoken peacefully and spiritually by millions of British Muslims in their daily lives. But the aggressive chanting below is intimidatory and threatening. And it’s an offence under Section 4 and 5 of the Public Order Act. Extremists routinely abuse common expressions for their own shameful ends. All violence must end. All violence must be called out.”

 

Perfectly reasonable comments.

 

Wave a Union Jack / Cross of St George in the stands at an England match = patriotic support for the country and team

 

Wave a Union Jack / Cross of St George next to a group of pro-Palestine demonstrators = racist intimidation by the 'far Right'.

 

It's all about context.

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...