As usual, you've got your facts wrong. Silver actually gave Trump a 28.6% chance of winning. Not only that, he thought that because of the rust belt vote, Trump might win the Electoral College but lose the popular vote. As for Real Clear Politics, the owner of that website are extreme right wingers. Another media site they own is Western Journal: Actually, even Rasmussen and RMG show Trump underwater. As for Real Clear Politics. 1. The "No Toss-Up" Electoral College MapRCP’s most famous projection tool was its "No Toss-Up" map, which assigned every state to a candidate based on who was leading in their polling average, regardless of how small the lead was. Final Projection: Hillary Clinton 272 vs. Donald Trump 266. Significance: This was one of the most competitive projections among major aggregators. While it technically favored Clinton, it showed Trump just four electoral votes shy of victory, indicating a much tighter race than the "landslide" predictions seen elsewhere. Well, if you think 49.8% of the popular vote qualifies as a landslide, you might to consider some other elections legitimately called landslides and how they differed from 2024's. What nuclear threat? Trump had already declared it abolished. And then to justify this latest escapade he lied by declaring the threat was imminent. If the cause is so good, why lie about it? The same people who belatedly got so indignant about Bush's lies, have no problem with Trump's.
Create an account or sign in to comment