Jump to content

Trump's Crude Sexual Attacks on Harris Spark Republican Frustration Amid Poll Gains


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Probably not in your circle 

 

Thanks for proving my point, that Democrat fan boys can only insult and throw mud.

 

Case closed. I won.

Posted
17 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Come on, speeding? jaywalking? littering? Anyone can see that they are the same thing as stealing defense secrets and laundering Russian Mafia money.

Nope...nothing.....I doubt anyone of us has even dropped a single piece of litter.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Thanks for proving my point, that Democrat fan boys can only insult and throw mud.

 

Case closed. I won.

Nice try.

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Everybody can claim that on the internet.

 

Is it really true though?

 

 

100%........no reason to lie.....we (me, brother and sister)   were brought up in a relaxed, loving environment...as were my kids and theirs .....we never had anything drummed into us.....we just knew wrong from right.

 

 

 

Edited by Will B Good
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

100%........no reason to lie.....we (me, brother and sister)   were brought up in a relaxed, loving environment...as were my kids and theirs .....we never had anything drummed into us.....we just knew wrong from right.

 

 

 

 

So what you're saying is that you've never done any speeding on any road while driving? Ever?

 

You've scrupulously adhered to every speed limit, and never once, not even accidentally gone over a speed limit on a motorway or any other road?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Moti24 said:

 

 

Not long after the 1916 election, it became obvious to me that Trump was not presidential material.  

 

 

 

   Trump wasn't even born then , so he wouldn't have been presidential material 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Trump wasn't even born then , so he wouldn't have been presidential material 

Didn't see that.  Thanks

Posted
1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

Just browse these  forums, where Trump is routinely defamed as a rapist, pedophile, etc all with impunity. 

 

Nobody in in their life commits no crimes. Laws are so all encompasing that everyone  comitts crimess, it's unavoidable due to the sheer multitude of laws. More so if you are in business and politics. The "crimes" Trump was accused of were all trumped up charges, bar none.

 

Michelle Obama did not run because she was afraid she'd be persecuted for being black. But she would surely have realised that any person who declares as presidential candidate will be subject to politically motivated lawsuits, defamation on tap, and all manner of problems. Had Trump not been a billionaire, they would long ago have broken him with one of the frivolous, politically motivated lawsuits,.

Can you link to where he is being called a pedo? 
 

Did the judge also defame Trump? 
 

He really should not have raped her. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

Can you link to where he is being called a pedo? 
 

Did the judge also defame Trump? 
 

He really should not have raped her. 

 

Just search the forum, plenty of democrat fan boys here have called Trump a pedophile.

 

The jury in the Caroll case found Trump not guilty of rape. Trump did not rape her under New York law.

 

The judge created a legal construct whereby digital penetration  is rape in other jurisdictions, where the trial did not take place, and therefore Caroll's statement that he raped her "was substantially true" because the jury accepted he had sexually assaulted her.

 

This matter will be subject to appeal and is not over.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Just search the forum, plenty of democrat fan boys here have called Trump a pedophile.

 

The jury in the Caroll case found Trump not guilty of rape. Trump did not rape her under New York law.

 

The judge created a legal construct whereby digital penetration  is rape in other jurisdictions, where the trial did not take place, and therefore Caroll's statement that he raped her "was substantially true" because the jury accepted he had sexually assaulted her.

 

This matter will be subject to appeal and is not over.

So it is only aggravated sexual assault. That makes everything OK. Now, what about stealing state secrets?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Just search the forum, plenty of democrat fan boys here have called Trump a pedophile.

 

The jury in the Caroll case found Trump not guilty of rape. Trump did not rape her under New York law.

 

The judge created a legal construct whereby digital penetration  is rape in other jurisdictions, where the trial did not take place, and therefore Caroll's statement that he raped her "was substantially true" because the jury accepted he had sexually assaulted her.

 

This matter will be subject to appeal and is not over.

It’s not my job to find evidence of your claims. Trump is currently liable for sexual abuse which as the judge confirmed is the same as rape in any other state. The judge confirmed he raped her. As it stands it is not defamation to state he raped her. An appeal has nothing to do with it currently. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

 

 

The jury in the Caroll case found Trump not guilty of rape. Trump did not rape her under New York law.

 

 

 

  That doesn't matter though, lots of people have said that he raped her, so  he did rape her because lots of people said he did 

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

So it is only aggravated sexual assault. 

 

If you believe Carroll. Remember she was allowed to use "outcry wtinesses", ie her own friends who said she talked about the rape to them.  Did you know in rape cases it's admissable to have people testify who were not at the rape, were not witnesses but who say their friend did mention it to them? Well in New York, it's admissable.

Edited by Cameroni
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

It’s not my job to find evidence of your claims. Trump is currently liable for sexual abuse which as the judge confirmed is the same as rape in any other state. The judge confirmed he raped her. As it stands it is not defamation to state he raped her. An appeal has nothing to do with it currently. 

 

It's not a claim, it's a fact. Plenty of people here have called Trump a pedophile.

 

The judge had to be careful to state he did not rape her under New York law, but because digital rape is considered rape in other jurisdictions he said the claim was "substantially true".

 

You still can not currently say he raped her in New York. Under New York law Trump did not rape Carroll. Remember the matter was tried in New York.

Edited by Cameroni
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  That doesn't matter though, lots of people have said that he raped her, so  he did rape her because lots of people said he did 

 

Effectively that is exactly right, because Caroll enlisted lots of her friends to testify that, even though they weren't there, they were told by Carroll after the event that it happened, the jury had considerable "evidence" for Caroll's claims.

 

How reliable a claim by a friend is about an event at which they are not present, is another matter.

 

However, even that jury found that Trump did not rape Caroll, but accepted he fondled and fingered her. For which again, the only evidence is Carroll's friends' statements and her own account.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

It's not a claim, it's a fact. Plenty of people here have called Trump a pedophile.

 

The judge had to be careful to state he did not rape her under New York law, but because digital rape is considered rape in other jurisdictions he said the claime was "substantially true".

 

You still can not currently say he raped her in New York. Under New York law Trump did not rape Carroll. Remember the matter was tried in New York.

So you are comfortable claiming facts with no evidence to back them up. Got it.

 

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

https://archive.ph/clJZq

Posted
4 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

So you are comfortable claiming facts with no evidence to back them up. Got it.

 

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

https://archive.ph/clJZq

 

   The Judge did state that rape doesn't necessarily mean penetration  with the knob , the word can mean numerous things .

  Bur the word rape can mean anything that you want it to mean 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, coolcarer said:

So you are comfortable claiming facts with no evidence to back them up. Got it.

 

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

https://archive.ph/clJZq

 

Completely false. The jury in the Carroll trial specifically did NOT find Trump guilty of rape. 

 

Verdict and aftermath (May 2023–present)

The jury reached a unanimous decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours.[130] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

 

The judge merely had to make a call on the rape after Trump had sued Carroll because she publicly accused him of rape again after the trial. It was then that Kaplan came up with his bizarre construct that although the jury had found Trump not guillty of rape, because in other jurisdictions, where Trump was not tried, digital penetration is rape the claim was "substantially" true, because he was found guilty of sexual abuse.

 

Trump was never, ever, found guilty of rape in a rape trial.

 

As for the evidence that Trump has been called a pedophile here it is all around you, just look at the threads.

Edited by Cameroni
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

If Trump and Vance went home, locked themselves up, and did not say anything, or appear again until the election, they would have a better chance of winning. Otherwise, they shoot themselves in the foot daily, as they are both horrendously poor candidates and campaigners. And Vance really needs to avoid donut shops, and Trump really needs do avoid all contact with the military. They despise him, for many good reasons. 

 

As it stands now, I do not see them getting elected, thankfully. Anyone but Trump. 

 

 

FB_IMG_1724087173021.jpg

Edited by spidermike007
Posted
23 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Completely false. The jury in the Carroll trial specifically did NOT find Trump guilty of rape. 

 

Verdict and aftermath (May 2023–present)

The jury reached a unanimous decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours.[130] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

 

The judge merely had to make a call on the rape after Trump had sued Carroll because she publicly accused him of rape again after the trial. It was then that Kaplan came up with his bizarre construct that although the jury had found Trump not guillty of rape, because in other jurisdictions, where Trump was not tried, digital penetration is rape the claim was "substantially" true, because he was found guilty of sexual abuse.

 

Trump was never, ever, found guilty of rape in a rape trial.

 

As for the evidence that Trump has been called a pedophile here it is all around you, just look at the threads.

So whats completly false about that Washington Post article? Is this another of your claims that you make with no evidence? You are good at that.

Posted
3 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Another right wing newbie. Do you guys inbred? 

I think that rather like Doctor Who, at the end of a series they regenerate into another form!

  • Love It 1
Posted
3 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Yeah, he's a real example to our youth.

You need help with facts. 

 

Biden stole documents as VP, which he wasn't allowed to have. Prove Sedition. Is Trump Charged. 

 

No, he isn't.  Go ahead and prove sedition. Do you always bandy about with words you likely don't understand?

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Another right wing newbie. Do you guys inbred? 

To level ad hominem attacks, you should at least write with proper grammar. Did you never go to school? 

 

Your sentence shows a massive disrespect for the English language.

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Moti24 said:

The President of The United States of America will have advisers for every subject on earth. 

Most of them are deep State Scum who hate America. 

Posted
9 hours ago, mdr224 said:

What do you mean last 48 hours. Ive been guns blazing since i got here and im not going anywhere

I can see you will get the nickname of No-Toes in no time.

Posted
3 hours ago, daveAustin said:

Indeed. Trump has been castigated and called every name under the sun. He's not a murderer, is he? How many wars did he start? It's pretty pathetic how people can't laugh and brush this kind of thing off. We have become a world of thin-skinned, hurt little children.

So the women he grabbed by the pussy should just brush it off. The families of the dead soldiers he called suckers and losers should forget about it. The investors he ruined with 7 bankruptcies should get on with their lives.

 

If I engaged your services as a contractor, then said I will pay you ten cents on the dollar, or you'll get nothing while I drag you through the courts, would you just walk away meekly?

 

Congratulations, Competitor #5 in my stupid post competition.

Posted
3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

So what you're saying is that you've never done any speeding on any road while driving? Ever?

 

You've scrupulously adhered to every speed limit, and never once, not even accidentally gone over a speed limit on a motorway or any other road?

 

Can't drive.....never had a licence, never needed one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 80

      U.S. Senators Introduce Legislation to Counter UN Actions Against Israel

    2. 6

      Thai Tesla driver admits reckless driving after argument - video

    3. 110

      Who's Gonna Win The Tyson Fight?

    4. 5

      Thailand Live Wednesday 20 November 2024

    5. 6

      Thai Tesla driver admits reckless driving after argument - video

    6. 20

      Tourist Hits Pattaya Street Sweeper, Attempts to Flee but is Captured by Bystanders

    7. 84

      New Alcohol Control Bill Nearly Finalised; Set for December House Vote

    8. 0

      UK Faces Diplomatic Tightrope Amid Potential Trade War

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...