Is Civil Unrest Inevitable If Trump Loses?

[GroveHillWanderer]

8 hours ago, Masterton said:

 

What a completely idiotic comment. There are no such things as 'fake electors'. Perhaps you should get your information from sources other than Democrat Party propaganda and do your research about elections and history. Opposing parties sending alternate slates of electors is not only legal, but in the case of the 1960 election resulted in the alternate (Democrat) slate being granted the votes.

 

Do your own research and form your own viewpoints instead of blindly parroting fake news propaganda.

 

The article below (and many other similar ones) would seem to indicate there were fake electors. There are multiple court cases against then and a bunch of them have already pleaded guilty, or accepted deals.

 

Quote

As of July 2024, fake electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada have been charged with crimes.

 

The cases against fake electors and where they stand

 

Quote

On August 7, Lorraine Pellegrino, one of the 11 fake electors, pleaded guilty ...

 

At least three of the 16 fake electors in Georgia have been indicted and face prosecution, while eight agreed to immunity deals.

 

Edited 12 hours ago by GroveHillWanderer

[riclag]

14 hours ago, Masterton said:

 

What a completely idiotic comment. There are no such things as 'fake electors'. Perhaps you should get your information from sources other than Democrat Party propaganda and do your research about elections and history. Opposing parties sending alternate slates of electors is not only legal, but in the case of the 1960 election resulted in the alternate (Democrat) slate being granted the votes.

 

Do your own research and form your own viewpoints instead of blindly parroting fake news propaganda.

Thank you for reminding everyone!

The lefts propaganda machine(party & media activists )is truly more powerful , deceptive , destructive and far reaching than anything I’ve ever experienced!imop

 

 

 

 

 

Edited 7 hours ago by riclag

[connda]

Is Civil Unrest Inevitable If Trump Harris Loses?

 

As the political climate intensifies, many are wondering what could happen if Trump Harris were to lose the upcoming election. His Her fervent base is known for its passionate support, but could this lead to civil unrest? With tensions rising over issues like election integrity and governance, what do you think the reaction would be? Could we see widespread protests, or will his her supporters accept the outcome? 

👆 It's an equally pertinent question. 👆

[candide]

12 minutes ago, connda said:

Is Civil Unrest Inevitable If Trump Harris Loses?

 

As the political climate intensifies, many are wondering what could happen if Trump Harris were to lose the upcoming election. His Her fervent base is known for its passionate support, but could this lead to civil unrest? With tensions rising over issues like election integrity and governance, what do you think the reaction would be? Could we see widespread protests, or will his her supporters accept the outcome? 

👆 It's an equally pertinent question. 👆

Don't worry. The Dems do  not intend to assault the Capitol in an attempt to steal elections!

[Furioso]

I think only the crazies (like what happened in the Capitol riot) will come out again. American's are not organized enough to do any real damage. Plus, they're divided over many, many issues you kinda need more than an 80 year old obese rich golfer to fight over. There's probably less than 500 loonies(with horns, painted faces, fur coonskin caps)that will lash out when Trump loses. 

 

The only way to organize American's into fighting/rioting en masse' will be when they are so downtrodden they simply have no other choice, probably about 5 or 10 years away. 

[cjinchiangrai]

20 hours ago, Masterton said:

 

What a completely idiotic comment. There are no such things as 'fake electors'. Perhaps you should get your information from sources other than Democrat Party propaganda and do your research about elections and history. Opposing parties sending alternate slates of electors is not only legal, but in the case of the 1960 election resulted in the alternate (Democrat) slate being granted the votes.

 

Do your own research and form your own viewpoints instead of blindly parroting fake news propaganda.

There are two slates of electors until the election, at which point only one set moves forward. Your post is disingenuous at best. At the time of presentation to Congress there is only one slate per state. Any others are fraudulent and subject to felony prosecution as these idiots are finding out.