DIY Cheap Charlie

[Red Phoenix]

This major study involves 1.7 million children but is not peer-reviewed yet, although it already dates from May 2024. 

But it features an interesting fact. 

The study found that heart damage only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines.

Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from heart-related problems.

In addition, the researchers note zero children from the entire group, vaccinated or unvaccinated, died from COVID-19.

 

> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1.full.pdf

[johng]

Thanks @Red Phoenix  

[0ffshore360]

6 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

This major study involves 1.7 million children but is not peer-reviewed yet, although it already dates from May 2024. 

But it features an interesting fact. 

The study found that heart damage only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines.

Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from heart-related problems.

In addition, the researchers note zero children from the entire group, vaccinated or unvaccinated, died from COVID-19.

 

> https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1.full.pdf

You can expect  some/much caustic fallout for posting such  material.

Personally I believe it is important to present and/or challenge  dictate of  mass mandated approval of inflictions on children in particular.

 

 

[johng]

5 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

You can expect  some/much caustic fallout for posting such  material.

Yes its quite damning evidence  I expect every effort to sweep it under the carpet.

[thesetat2013]

3 minutes ago, johng said:

Yes its quite damning evidence  I expect every effort to sweep it under the carpet.

Especially from the Pro-Covid vaccine supporters. It amazes me there are not thousands even millions of lawsuits against the manufacturers for pushing the vaccine to most of the world. A get rich quick scheme with barely any testing prior to its distribution and forced acceptance.. But I would bet that governments have given immunity to them anyway. Since there were so many bad repercussions against anyone who talked against taking the vaccine. You could not post anywhere if something bad happened when you took the vaccine. Not even in social media. It was like the powers that be wanted only good things said so everyone would want to take it. 

[johng]

8 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

It amazes me there are not thousands even millions of lawsuits against the manufacturers

They where given indemnity ie: they cannot be sued ! the injured party has to try and sue the government   however there are some lawsuits in  process  trying to overturn that indemnity  by establishing that the  manufactures fraudulently 

claimed  100 % "safe and effective"  ( remember that ? )  and knew that it was anything but.

[brewsterbudgen]

While there's no doubt the Covid vaccine was a life saver for millions of adults, I thought it had always been understood that children were extremely unlikely to suffer any serious consequences from Covid, so why would they be vaccinated?

[johng]

39 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

children were extremely unlikely to suffer any serious consequences from Covid, so why would they be vaccinated?

Because the "powers that be"  mandated,coerced and shamed parents into it ?

[Red Phoenix]

1 hour ago, brewsterbudgen said:

While there's no doubt the Covid vaccine was a life saver for millions of adults,

That's what they want you to believe...

[owl sees all]

13 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

While there's no doubt the Covid vaccine was a life saver for millions of adults, I thought it had always been understood that children were extremely unlikely to suffer any serious consequences from Covid, so why would they be vaccinated?

 

Giving ANYvaxxes to children is simply madness. There are moves underway to give chicken pox jabs to 12 month olds. What!!??

 

What is the point of any jab? To protect from a virus that has never been shown to exist, let alone cause harm? The whole big pharma medical, WHO house of cards needs to be collapsed.

 

Nature has all the answers we seek.

 

This post is my opinion. Although built upon decades of research. Anyone disagreeing can do their own and find their truths. Let's debate.

[brewsterbudgen]

24 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

 

Giving ANYvaxxes to children is simply madness. There are moves underway to give chicken pox jabs to 12 month olds. What!!??

 

What is the point of any jab? To protect from a virus that has never been shown to exist, let alone cause harm? The whole big pharma medical, WHO house of cards needs to be collapsed.

 

Nature has all the answers we seek.

 

This post is my opinion. Although built upon decades of research. Anyone disagreeing can do their own and find their truths. Let's debate.

 

Why does Admin allow nonsense and dangerous posts from Anti-vax nutters?

[owl sees all]

3 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

Why does Admin allow nonsense and dangerous posts from Anti-vax nutters?

Can't have an opinion that differs from yours eh Brewster?

Can't debate, cause you would surely lose. So! Hint, hint towards admin.

 

Under an electron microscope, a 'virus' is  indistinguishable from some other decaying parts of the cell. When the cells breaks down, it is expelled from the body. The body is not stupid. It don't do things for nothing. The different parts of the decaying cells, and tissue, are coated, packaged and eliminated; mostly through breathing. What part do viruses play in this particular part of the replenishing cycle?

 

There are as many as one billion cells being gotten rid of each day. They are - in a healthy body - renewed. It's an on-going process.

 

Who says I'm anti-jab. I've had 20 this year. Just hope she don't discover the right cross or left hook.

 

 

[dinsdale]

4 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

Why does Admin allow nonsense and dangerous posts from Anti-vax nutters?

Please explain why this is nonsense. I think many of us would like to hear. Do you think young healthy people needed to and still need to be vaccinated for SarsCov-2 with mRNA vaccines? It would also be interesting to see your reasoning as to why a person who does not want to take the mRNA vaccine is an anti-vaxxer. This of course was part of the demonising campaign and completely without merit.

[KhunLA]

That sadly, is no surprise to me.  Only surprised it hasn't been deleted yet 

 

IMHO ... IMHO  ... that title could apply to all that received or didn't receive the vaccine.

 

Just my opinion of course

[brewsterbudgen]

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Please explain why this is nonsense. I think many of us would like to hear. Do you think young healthy people needed to and still need to be vaccinated for SarsCov-2 with mRNA vaccines? It would also be interesting to see your reasoning as to why a person who does not want to take the mRNA vaccine is an anti-vaxxer. This of course was part of the demonising campaign and completely without merit.

I was commenting on the anti-vaxxer who said it was "madness" to give ANY vaccines to children.