Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

Is Trump going to do 60 minutes now?

 

Probably not, because they may put the word salad they edited out of the Harris interview, into his.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Bloomberg Editor-In-Chief John Micklethwait did not take it easy on Trump, and it quickly became clear that the former president has no conception of the mechanics of or the potential ramifications of the economic platform he’s running on. 

Bluntly, the former president was incoherent when pressed with real questions about his policies.

Micklethwait spent most of the interview attempting to break Trump out of what the former president repeatedly referred to as “the weave,” his term for his rambling digressions — with ever-decreasing intelligibility — and general inability to focus on a given topic for more than a few seconds during his rallies and interviews.

https://archive.ph/gNmng#selection-1651.242-1655.330

post a video of the interview rather than some leftwing hack 'interpretation' of it

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Will B Good nailed you fair and square. Stop wriggling.

shut up man, jeezuz, a 45 second out of context, cropped clip, posted by the independent nothing, same as the Flagrant podcast clip you lot fawned over last week. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

shut up man, jeezuz, a 45 second out of context, cropped clip, posted by the independent nothing, same as the Flagrant podcast clip you lot fawned over last week. 

 

The Lady doth protest too much, methinks.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

It was a good interview. Mickelthwait pressed Trump on some issues, held his feet to the fire, and asked good follow up questions. Trump parried and stuck to his guns. It was a good, spirited back-and-forth.  Nothing wrong with that. A President should be able to handle it.  

 

A pity that Harris declined the same invitation. We shall see how she does with Bret Baier.  

Yes, a good interview but if that was an example of Trump 'handling it' (as you seem to indicated) then I shudder to think what he looks like when he doesn't handle it.

There's no way Trump's staff were high-fiving each other when that interview was done.

  • Like 2
Posted
38 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

The Lady doth protest too much, methinks.

no, just dont give a 45 second random clip any credibility, 

  • Haha 2
Posted
45 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

What is the world coming to when a potential leader of the free world

 

1. Can't lie freely and

2. Is fact checked on those lies.

 

I despair at times.

if only 'fact checking' was done equally.

  • Haha 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Indeed, other sources claim Trump destroyed the Bloomberg clown. The only candidate I have seen crumble is Kamala, you would have to be a fool or a traitor to vote for madame word salad. People need to put the country before party loyalty, there is no way Harris is capable of being President. 

 

 

Other source, not sources, and Sky News ?????????
post a video of the interview rather than some rightwing hack 'interpretation' of it

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Trump is so mentally incompetent that he insists that tariffs won't be paid for by consumers but by... well it's not sure if he means the importers or the countries of their origin. But either way, this is the kind of thing that an elementary school child could see is nonsense.

 

Well you would say that 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Trump is so mentally incompetent that he insists that tariffs won't be paid for by consumers but by... well it's not sure if he means the importers or the countries of their origin. But either way, this is the kind of thing that an elementary school child could see is nonsense.

if they're so bad why did Biden keep them, Why did Biden implement 100% tariff on Chinese EV's, exactly what Trump had said weeks earlier in the 'bloodbath' speech

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, proton said:

 

Why don't you if that interested, and why should 'rightwing' outlets not have their say against all the liberal toe suckers? you know the same ones lying to us that Biden was as sharp as a tack and did not have dementia, and who are now pretending Harris is a competent candidate elected by the party.

Suggest you ask Frank....as per his previous comment...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...