Former GOP Adviser Predicts Harris Will 'Win Comfortably' Against Trump in Chaotic Race

[newnative]

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Cryingdick beat you to it.

 

And Vance beat Cryingdick.

[Caldera]

11 hours ago, Social Media said:

Harris is going to win fairly comfortably. I think Harris is gonna win by a larger margin than 2020.

 

I hope he's right  but I don't see it.

[Eric Loh]

Trump lost the ground game due to lack of campaign funds and Elon has to prop up the fund and hire freelancers to knock on doors. They are not party staffs and have no motivation to perform the tasks diligently. There really no dynamism in Trump’s campaign in these last few days and the energy is dissipating and low compare to the energy that the Harris’s campaign which is still exciting new voters and independents. Trump’s advisers have continuously tell Trump to move away from the grievances and personal attacks and concentrate on policies but he just can’t do it. Totally agree the GOP adviser that he will lose the election badly. MAGA tears. 

[John Drake]

I do believe she will win. I've said so since she replaced Biden. Women are going to vote massively in her favor because of the abortion issue. It may have seemed to have disappeared from the campaign, but I would bet that young women and suburban boomer and Xer women will vote 70 percent or more her way. In the end, Trump's male voters will not bother to show up. They'll probably go to a sports bar to talk about the NFL or the NBA instead.

[still kicking]

15 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And here we have a problem with Trump’s supporters, both foreign and domestic.

 

Non of us know who will win the election, we of course all have our view. 
 

However Trump has already primed his supporters, both foreign and domestic, not to accept the result unless he wins.

 

How these people will respond if Trump does not win remains to be seen.
 

We have interesting times ahead of us.

 

Love your reply not as nasty as Trump supporters 

[nauseus]

14 hours ago, Wrwest said:

PBS Newshour, broadcast in the USA last eve, talked about the attempted fraud, burning of ballots, false video of mail in ballots being destroyed. Gee, I do wonder which supporters are involved here?  Fortunately, the election officials reiterated the checks and safeguards actively exposing these attempts to throw doubt into the American election process. My thanks to all our American poll/election workers who are diligently working as American citizens to keep our elections safe and secure (even while the right threatens them and their families from those who follow Trump's false claims of winning the 2020 election).

 

Strange they didn't give a fig four years ago.

[thesetat2013]

19 hours ago, thesetat2013 said:

Actually, you are wrong. Many Dems are now switching to say they will vote for Trump. That is why he is in the lead now in the polls. 

Sorry for the Dems. But preliminary early and mail in votes are showing Trump is leading in Pennsylvania and Arizona and some other states. 

[Tug]

16 minutes ago, thesetat2013 said:

Sorry for the Dems. But preliminary early and mail in votes are showing Trump is leading in Pennsylvania and Arizona and some other states. 

Naa you are just seeing disaffected republicans voting for Harris .just watched Michelle Obama speak at a Harris rally WOW!that lady is EFFECTIVE!witch begs to question just were are the females of the trump family?nope …..im feeling stronger in my gut about a Harris win!trumps just to damaged not to mention he’s entirely unfit and  a convicted felon to boot.

[thesetat2013]

3 hours ago, Tug said:

Naa you are just seeing disaffected republicans voting for Harris .just watched Michelle Obama speak at a Harris rally WOW!that lady is EFFECTIVE!witch begs to question just were are the females of the trump family?nope …..im feeling stronger in my gut about a Harris win!trumps just to damaged not to mention he’s entirely unfit and  a convicted felon to boot.

And you are deluded and refusing to give up on Harris. It is ok.. I do not care who wins as long as it does not affect me here or the money I get. 

[Gsxrnz]

Trump will win. The Dems will win the House and attempt to not certify the electoral votes. The Republicans will drink coffee in the rain and deny the House of a quorum, and J D Vance becomes president under the 12th Amendment, thus preventing a civil war 

Edited October 27 by Gsxrnz

[Wrwest]

On 10/27/2024 at 12:41 AM, nauseus said:

 

Strange they didn't give a fig four years ago.

Sure they did, reporting on the dozens of independent court cases filed by Trump supporters that determined the absence of fraud.

[nauseus]

4 hours ago, Wrwest said:

Sure they did, reporting on the dozens of independent court cases filed by Trump supporters that determined the absence of fraud.

 

The cases filed were never heard. Wonder why that was?

[impulse]

4 hours ago, Wrwest said:

Sure they did, reporting on the dozens of independent court cases filed by Trump supporters that determined the absence of fraud.

 

Sure they did, reporting on the dozens of independent court cases filed by Trump supporters that determined the absence of fraud standing.  They didn't rule on the facts or the merit.

 

Fixed it for you.

 

[Wrwest]

On 10/28/2024 at 12:54 PM, nauseus said:

 

The cases filed were never heard. Wonder why that was?

Lack od "standing" and lack of "evidence" if I recall.

[Wrwest]

23 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Sure they did, reporting on the dozens of independent court cases filed by Trump supporters that determined the absence of fraud standing.  They didn't rule on the facts or the merit.

 

Fixed it for you.

 

So, poor legal cases.

[transam]

On 10/26/2024 at 4:19 AM, Tug said:

I certainly hope he correct,personally I think many republicans are going to vote for Harris no one in their circle will be the wiser…..

Yep.........😎..........For sure.........

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, Wrwest said:

Lack od "standing" and lack of "evidence" if I recall.

 

Almost all the former. No explanations, just outright rejections issued like bullets. But it was close to Christmas and New Year,

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, Wrwest said:

So, poor legal cases.

 

Poor legal oversight, more like.

[JonnyF]

On 10/26/2024 at 3:36 AM, Social Media said:

In a recent interview, GOP strategist and former Mitt Romney adviser Stuart Stevens shared a bold prediction regarding Vice President Kamala Harris’s chances in the upcoming election. Speaking with *Vanity Fair’s* Joe Hagan, Stevens praised the Harris campaign’s strategy, describing it as "the best presidential campaign ever."

 

With predictions and observations like that, I'm not surprised he is the FORMER advisor. 😆

[Wrwest]

18 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Almost all the former. No explanations, just outright rejections issued like bullets. But it was close to Christmas and New Year,

Hmm, the findings and reasoning are publicly available to all.

[nauseus]

6 hours ago, Wrwest said:

Hmm, the findings and reasoning are publicly available to all.

 

I saw a few, all short, sour and similar. Lack of standing or something like that. Merry Christmas!