Do Jewish People Have High IQ?

[dinsdale]

6 hours ago, theblether said:

Re the illegality of the 2020 election. I don't have any strong opinions and I do think some on the right lost the plot. However - I did agree and still agree that votes received after election day should not be counted. Four years later ( dear me ) the 5th Circuit Appeals Court agrees. 

 

Americans have the benefit of knowing years in advance when your Presidential election takes place. Many other countries do not. There's really no excuse for failing to return ballots before election day and even if the US Postal service loses your vote, so sad, too bad. 

 

This goes to Trump's point that the judges have an impossible task to review malfeasance in the voting procedures and tallies. It is impossible, and the Democrats felt that way when Al Gore lost to Bush. So nothing new there. 

 

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-appeals-court-rejects-mississippi-law-late-arriving-mail-in-ballots-2024-10-25/

Paper ballots, on the day voting, voting closes at 5 or 6pm with voter ID being compulsory and postal votes being for those overseas or special cases..

Edited 6 hours ago by dinsdale

[dinsdale]

6 hours ago, Tug said:

Do you honestly think that 26 million people listened to that senile old rasist pontificate for 3 hours?I’ve got a pair of golden sneakers and cartoon cards for ya!or stock if you prefer lol 😂 

You use lol and the laughing emoji yet what you post is simply not funny. I guess the saying is true though simple things amuse simple minds.

[Walker88]

The latest ABC/Ipsos Poll, released Sunday, which shows Harris with a 2 pt lead nationally, breaks down the data into various demographics.

 

The biggest lead the other guy has is among non-college educated white males, where he holds a 41 pt advantage, 68% to 27%.

 

While intellect might not be directly correlated with education, the connection is likely pretty strong. If one is limited intellectually and talent-wise to jobs like janitor or truck driver, college is probably not part of the plan to career success. It is also quite likely that below average intellect makes a person susceptible to simplistic answers as well as a lack of ability to parse statements into fact or fiction, reality or hyperbole.

 

The (R) candidate has built his career, business and political, around hype, hyperbole and outright lies. Those of lesser intellect are easily fooled, and also might be impressed by a guy who has 'a concept of a plan' (e.g., healthcare), with that concept nine years in the making and still only---at best---a concept.

 

In a democracy, it's possible that is enough to squeak out an Electoral College victory, and the (R) candidate and his team know that, which is why his 'policy speeches' (other than the red meat stuff like deporting millions and holding military tribunals for critics of the thin-skinned petulant child) are either still concepts of a plan, or extremely poorly thought out (200% tariffs that "China will pay"). He backs up his concepts with his usual nonsense lines about "in two weeks, we will be releasing", and "many people are saying they've never seen anything this good". He has used both lines when discussing his replacement for the Affordable Care Act beginning way back in 2016. Eight years later those "two weeks" have yet to pass, but that's good enough for the non-college educated white male demographic.

 

And let's not forget how wildly impressed medical authorities were when he "aced" his cognitive test by repeating "Man Woman Person Camera TV". I guess that constitutes a parlor trick of astonishing skill, Penn & Teller-esque, to that non-college educated white male demographic.

[JonnyF]

On 10/26/2024 at 9:53 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

Around 0.1% of the U.S. population, while many viewers will have undoubtedly been overseas.

 

So yes, meh!

 

31,000,000 views in 2 days is "meh"?

 

 

This is huge. Especially when you consider how many votes could win the swing states.

 

Harris is toast. 

[transam]

12 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I f you ever manage to come up with a sensible question that actually relates to the topic, I'm sure I'll take a look at it.  🫡

I gave you a laugh, and here's something for you......

 

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/joe-rogan-asked-donald-trump-123459009.html

 

🤪

[dinsdale]

15 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

The latest ABC/Ipsos Poll, released Sunday, which shows Harris with a 2 pt lead nationally, breaks down the data into various demographics.

 

The biggest lead the other guy has is among non-college educated white males, where he holds a 41 pt advantage, 68% to 27%.

 

While intellect might not be directly correlated with education, the connection is likely pretty strong. If one is limited intellectually and talent-wise to jobs like janitor or truck driver, college is probably not part of the plan to career success. It is also quite likely that below average intellect makes a person susceptible to simplistic answers as well as a lack of ability to parse statements into fact or fiction, reality or hyperbole.

 

The (R) candidate has built his career, business and political, around hype, hyperbole and outright lies. Those of lesser intellect are easily fooled, and also might be impressed by a guy who has 'a concept of a plan' (e.g., healthcare), with that concept nine years in the making and still only---at best---a concept.

 

In a democracy, it's possible that is enough to squeak out an Electoral College victory, and the (R) candidate and his team know that, which is why his 'policy speeches' (other than the red meat stuff like deporting millions and holding military tribunals for critics of the thin-skinned petulant child) are either still concepts of a plan, or extremely poorly thought out (200% tariffs that "China will pay"). He backs up his concepts with his usual nonsense lines about "in two weeks, we will be releasing", and "many people are saying they've never seen anything this good". He has used both lines when discussing his replacement for the Affordable Care Act beginning way back in 2016. Eight years later those "two weeks" have yet to pass, but that's good enough for the non-college educated white male demographic.

 

And let's not forget how wildly impressed medical authorities were when he "aced" his cognitive test by repeating "Man Woman Person Camera TV". I guess that constitutes a parlor trick of astonishing skill, Penn & Teller-esque, to that non-college educated white male demographic.

Have you looked at any other polls? On Realclearpolling ABC/Ipsos has Harris leading by 4 points, however, the average of 14 polls shows Trump up 0.1 points. Of course it's the battleground states that are going to decide this. I do like the bit that talks about Harris though: "It is also quite likely that below average intellect makes a person susceptible to simplistic answers ...." Apart from this what you have posted is just more legacy media copy and paste..

[transam]

11 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Yes, why bother, its better for you to just hear edited out of context clips and keep up the distoted view you have of Trump rather than listen to him speak and make up you own mind. 🐑

Guessing again, and even Joe laughs at your man, that's Trump, not your Putin.........😁

 

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/joe-rogan-asked-donald-trump-123459009.html

[transam]

12 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Rogan never asked him for proof.  There was no word salad.  Rogan clearly agrees with Trump on multiple points.

 

You are not being accurate about what happened in the video.

And laughed at him...........😁

 

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/joe-rogan-asked-donald-trump-123459009.html

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

31,000,000 views in 2 days is "meh"?

 

 

This is huge. Especially when you consider how many votes could win the swing states.

 

Harris is toast. 

Which is why, while Trump was engaging in revisionism to an audience he already has, Harris was out campaigning in the swing states.

[Captain Flack]

A pointless flame post and reply, calling another poster a troll has been removed. Discuss the topic and drop the name calling.