Joe Rogan releases podcast with Trump, draws 300K views in 30 minutes

[Eric Loh]

9 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Being forced to be vaccinated. How's that for one. Freedom of speech. There's another. As for abortion Trump has clearly stated on many occasions that he's not anti abortion. He's anti late term abortion.

Vaccination was for the well being of the general public. Still there was exceptions in place for those who are unable to be vaccinated for medical reasons. Large businesses were also exempted due to Supreme Court ruling. Trump flip flopped numerous times on the issue of abortion as election nears. The fact that he keep boasting about overturning Roe v Wade is a strong statement that he is anti abortion,.15 states have taken his lead to banned abortions. That seem the trajectory he will take if he is elected. 

[frank83628]

oh look at that, Democrats what to change the rules, AGAIN!!

 

[JonnyF]

6 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

oh look at that, Democrats what to change the rules, AGAIN!!

 

 

 

Yep. Change the rules, change the location, change the duration of the interview. They'd probably want full editing rights and to change the interviewer to a CNN shill as well. 

 

To be honest, it's just a way of getting Harris out of the debate without directly saying No. The same way boxers price themselves out of fights they don't want to take. 

[frank83628]

30 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yep. Change the rules, change the location, change the duration of the interview. They'd probably want full editing rights and to change the interviewer to a CNN shill as well. 

 

To be honest, it's just a way of getting Harris out of the debate without directly saying No. The same way boxers price themselves out of fights they don't want to take. 

yeah, imagine what the media and shills here would say if it were Trump doin it, he's this, he's that, blah blah zzzzz!.

 

 

[proton]

4 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

She was voted by the majority of the 3,936 Democratic delegates to secure her nomination as party's protocol required. . Saying nobody voted for her is typical Maga mis-information.

 

who were the other candidates?

[Jingthing]

5 minutes ago, proton said:

 

who were the other candidates?

There weren't any. 

Nobody chose to step into that.

As that's the way it happened, if there really was an anti-Harris groundswell, the delegates could still have chosen to not vote for anyone.

Yet almost all of them voted for Harris.

You can't act like this was a normal situation where there could have been a new primary. That was IMPOSSIBLE. 

It obviously was because Biden withdrew so late in the process after he had fully secured the nomination.

Ideally Biden shouldn't have ever run for reelection, but he did, so you deal with reality as it is.

The democrats then had to choose between a risky divisive internal fight or to unify with who was most logical, the Vice President, whose name at least was on the same ballot as Biden in the primaries.

The democrats made the wisest choice available to them at the time.

Edited October 29 by Jingthing

[proton]

Just now, Jingthing said:

There weren't any. 

Nobody chose to step into that.

As that's the way it happened, if there really was an anti-Harris groundswell, the delegates could still have chosen to not vote for anyone.

Yes almost all of them voted for Harris.

You can't act like this was a normal situation.

It obviously wasn't because Biden withdrew so late in the process after he had fully secured the nomination.

The democrats then had to choose between a risky divisive internal fight or to unify with who was most logical, the Vice President, whose name at least was on the same ballot as Biden in the primaries.

The democrats made the wisest choice available to them at the time.

 

Not a democratic election then, she was appointed, the so called votes were a farcical rubber stamp

[Jingthing]

3 minutes ago, proton said:

 

Not a democratic election then, she was appointed, the so called votes were a farcical rubber stamp

You're confused.

Party nominating conventions are not elections.

The primary election happened before and it was all over before Biden withdrew.

Then because of the timing a new primary election process was impossible.

So the democrats had the choice between an open convention (NOT ELECTIONS!) and unifying behind the Vice President.

Again, the delegates were completely free to NOT vote for her at the convention and other democrats were completely free to challenge her. NOBODY DID. Deal with it and stop the silly sniping.

Edited October 29 by Jingthing

[JonnyF]

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

You're confused.

Party nominating conventions are not elections.

The primary election happened before and it was all over before Biden withdrew.

Then because of the timing a new primary election process was impossible.

So the democrats had the choice between an open convention (NOT ELECTIONS!) and unifying behind the Vice President.

Again, the delegates were completely free to NOT vote for her at the convention and other democrats were completely free to challenge her. NOBODY DID. Deal with it and stop the silly sniping.

 

They didn't have Democratic elections for the nominee because they were dead set on her being the candidate and knew she couldn't win a vote.  

 

A strange decision to make about someone about to enter a Democratic Presidential election. "Hey, let's select the one who can't win if put to a vote".  

 

Anyway, you'll see how stupid it was next week. 😆

 

 

[BangkokReady]

12 hours ago, Jingthing said:

It's the maga fascist movement that is the white nationalist identity party.

 

Meaningless garbage to make anyone who doesn't agree with you sound bad so you can try to ignore them.

[transam]

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Meaningless garbage to make anyone who doesn't agree with you sound bad so you can try to ignore them.

Eh.....?  

[BangkokReady]

On 10/28/2024 at 5:33 PM, Eric Loh said:

On 10/28/2024 at 5:24 PM, frank83628 said:

Where has Rogan said it was a <deleted> show?

I admit he didn't said that directly. Saying that Trump said a lot of crazy sh..t has that connotation. 

 

Funnily enough, I just stumbled across that section of the podcast in another video.

 

When Rogan says "You said a lot of wild sh*t", he's referring to what Trump has said generally over time that has contributed to him getting a lot of publicity.  He also says that that is why Trump became so popular.

 

It isn't even Rogan commenting on the podcast and had no connotations as to how he felt about it.  🙄

 

So, we've gone from Rogan saying it was a sh*t show, to Rogan saying that Trump said a lot of crazy sh*t during the podcast, to the truth, which is that Rogan didn't say either of those things.

 

It's amazing the things that people come out with.

 

Even giving Eric the benefit of the doubt (and assuming he's simply parroting propaganda from biased sources), it's still pretty wild that he would simply regurgitate unsubstantiated claims, when he can so easily watch the podcast for himself.  🤷‍♂️

Edited October 29 by BangkokReady

[BangkokReady]

4 minutes ago, transam said:

Eh.....?  

 

Huh?  😐

[frank83628]

6 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You're confused.

Party nominating conventions are not elections.

The primary election happened before and it was all over before Biden withdrew.

Then because of the timing a new primary election process was impossible.

So the democrats had the choice between an open convention (NOT ELECTIONS!) and unifying behind the Vice President.

Again, the delegates were completely free to NOT vote for her at the convention and other democrats were completely free to challenge her. NOBODY DID. Deal with it and stop the silly sniping.

before the coup against Biden, i would love it if he speaks out in the coming few days after being stitched up by Schumer, Pelosi and whoever else was involved, what a great  ending that would be!

[BangkokReady]

23 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

before the coup against Biden, i would love it if he speaks out in the coming few days after being stitched up by Schumer, Pelosi and whoever else was involved, what a great  ending that would be!

 

His exit is going to be a pretty tragic one.  He's been exposed and humiliated.  His final image is of an old man suffering from dementia that him and his party tried to conceal from the nation, using pretty insulting lies (like he has a speech impediment).

 

I actually genuinely feel sorry for Biden.  (Unlike loony-lefties, I don't have a deep rooted hatred for anyone who I disagree with.)  He should have been allowed to retire before his condition was exposed.  Now he's a laughing stock.

[GammaGlobulin]

On 10/26/2024 at 9:08 PM, dinsdale said:

I'm sure I'll get negative comments and the the brainless clicking of the laughing emoji for this and I expect this will be from posters who don't even watch this and say it's all "MAGA propaganda, but it is interesting and well done and shows just how tight things are looking for just over a week from now. Ignore the clickbait screen grab and just watch the video

 

 

You may get negative comments.

 

But I ask you....

 

What kind of Komments do you think you will get from readers based in India?

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

Where can I find this ROGAINE® interview you keep harping on?

 

Trump, loves full and fluffy hair, by the way, as everybody knows.

 

How much of the interview is devoted to hair issues, I do wonder.

 

 

[JonnyF]

10 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Where can I find this ROGAINE® interview you keep harping on?

 

Google and YouTube buried it for a while but it's back now.

 

39 million views and counting.

 

JD Vance is next up. Harris blew her chance with her diva demands. 

 

 

[Eric Loh]

52 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Google and YouTube buried it for a while but it's back now.

 

39 million views and counting.

 

JD Vance is next up. Harris blew her chance with her diva demands. 

 

 

It was unlisted due to technical issue. Not buried. 

[JonnyF]

26 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

It was unlisted due to technical issue. Not buried. 

 

Is that what they claimed? 😆

[Eric Loh]

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Is that what they claimed? 😆

Not. What Joe Rogan said. 

[frank83628]

32 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

It was unlisted due to technical issue. Not buried. 

'technical issue', yeah right, just like Trumps assassination attempt was not in the search results and the 'fight' photo just happened to accidently get supressed at FB, and the doss attack on X when it was Trumps interview......

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, Eric Loh said:

Not. What Joe Rogan said. 

 

Yes, Joe makes an awful lot of money from YouTube. 😏

[JonnyF]

Just now, frank83628 said:

'technical issue', yeah right, just like Trumps assassination attempt was not in the search results and the 'fight' photo just happened to accidently get supressed at FB, and the doss attack on X when it was Trumps interview......

 

Loads of stuff gets buried on Google these days. It's unreal.

 

I've pretty much stopped using it. Looking forward to Musk's new search engine. 

[frank83628]

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Loads of stuff gets buried on Google these days. It's unreal.

 

I've pretty much stopped using it. Looking forward to Musk's new search engine. 

duck duck used to be good, but thats the same as the rest now, i don't know of another that doesn't give only MSM results for anything trump, covid, or vaccine related.

 

luckily musk has X so you can find stuff there, but i will also be happy when Musk starts a new one.

 

 Robert Epstein exposes a lot about google and how they suppress certain things, certainly on the political side of things.

[GammaGlobulin]

2 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

It was unlisted due to technical issue. Not buried. 

 

Absolutely.

For a few days, at least, typing in "the Trump Rogaine Interview" brought up NOTHING much of interest.

 

It was possible to find excerpts of the interview, shared by other YT sites, however.

 

I will watch it, just because I want to know more about the next president of the USA.

 

 

[JonnyF]

On 10/26/2024 at 9:53 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

Around 0.1% of the U.S. population, while many viewers will have undoubtedly been overseas.

 

So yes, meh!

 

50 Million views.

 

A Trump landslide.

 

Bang on the money again Chomps 😆.

 

[Chomper Higgot]

22 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

50 Million views.

 

A Trump landslide.

 

Bang on the money again Chomps 😆.

 

Oh.

 

[JonnyF]

42 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Oh.

 

 

It's a shame Kamala wasn't able to hold down a conversation with Rogan for 3 hours like Trump did.

 

It might have helped her shake off those "Wine Mom" vibes that she was increasingly putting out as the campaign progressed.