Over 50 and Feeling the Frustration

[thaibeachlovers]

Just now, IC2000 said:

 

Perhaps a poor choice of words. By hard I simply meant pro. Hard women can be fun in a purely transactional sense otherwise quite unpleasant. As I stated in additional posts Asian women in general have quite a lovely disposition.

Thank you for that. Makes more sense. I base my opinion on the fact that most of the young women I took away for a holiday had moved on the next time I returned, and I had to look for a new one.

Even my 8 year BG GF left the bar and went back to school in Buri Ram after a few years. I let her know by e mail when I was coming and she's go to Bkk to meet me. I still had to pay though, of course, but as I wasn't paying bar fine, our choice of accommodation improved.

[RSD1]

28 minutes ago, IC2000 said:

Well, whatever you're after PSE or GFE you've got to suss that out.

Maybe you should give some of those East African girls a go that are around. Could be a new and satisfying experience for you. Might even cure any of those unwanted Mr. Softee problems. You know what they say, right?

[thaibeachlovers]

2 minutes ago, IC2000 said:

 

Sorry. You'd written you were in BKK?? Past that age - so, over 75? I think you sell yourself and the experience short. Get out and find some chicken.

I don't know where you got the idea I was still in Bkk, as I don't recall writing that I was living there. I'd never live in Bkk anyway- awful place, except for the women to look at..

 

I'd off myself before I'd go out with a granny. I may be that age, but it doesn't mean I have to like old women.

[RSD1]

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

I'd off myself before I'd go out with a granny. I may be that age, but it doesn't mean I have to like old women.

OK, so you skip all the GILF content on Pornhub. What a pity. Variety is the spice of life. Try smoking a bit of weed first. Then you might suddenly find yourself adding some of those GILF clips to your top ten playlist. 😉

[thaibeachlovers]

10 minutes ago, IC2000 said:

 

I'm married. Wife has a decent job so we stay. As stated many times before in this thread not easy to come by. Each day I take off for malls or wherever. Beauties everywhere.

None can compare to top floor of MBK though. There are even sites on the internet dedicated to those Uni girls with their 2 sizes too small shirts and their micro mini skirts, not that I'd ever look at stuff like that myself, nudge nudge.

It must be hell to be a male professor teaching in that Uni.

 

I asked my Uni GF if they wore skirts that short in Buri Ram, and she said no way- they'd be kicked out if they did.

[RSD1]

4 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

None can compare to top floor of MBK though. There are even sites on the internet dedicated to those Uni girls with their 2 sizes too small shirts and their micro mini skirts, not that I'd ever look at stuff like that myself

Forget MBK. One has to visit Central Ladprao on a weekend. Any of the floors. The visuals there will surely fix any Mr. Softee problems. 
 

Edited November 4 by RSD1

[thaibeachlovers]

6 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

OK, so you skip all the GILF content on Pornhub. What a pity. Variety is the spice of life. Try smoking a bit of weed first. Then you might suddenly find yourself adding some of those GILF clips to your top ten playlist. 😉

I don't bother with Po*nhub.

Western po*n in the 80s used to have attractive girls without tats and/ or multiple piercings, but now seems it's all ugly tats and piercings with skanky women and gangster men.

[Nick Carter icp]

 

   ^ Do you guys realise that everyone can read your conversation ?

[RSD1]

12 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I don't bother with Po*nhub.

Western po*n in the 80s used to have attractive girls without tats and/ or multiple piercings, but now seems it's all ugly tats and piercings with skanky women and gangster men.

So what were you referring to when you were talking about Digital women? Is it those Trump NFT digital trading cards that are making you horny? After all, he does have chesticles nearly the size of Dolly Parton. 

[RSD1]

11 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   ^ Do you guys realise that everyone can read your conversation ?

You do realize it's intentional, right?

[thaibeachlovers]

2 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

So what were you referring to when you were talking about Digital women? Is it those Trump NFT digital trading cards that are making you horny? After all, he does have chesticles nearly the size of Dolly Parton. 

Since when was Po*nhub the only site on the internet?

[JimTripper]

You're gonna get frustrated when you hit over 50. You're not as hard as you once were. Stray hairs start appearing everywhere. The body requires constant shaving and plucking to stay managable. The eyes and teeth start causing problems. Women start passing you by.

 

You're getting older, man...(but not as old as your father)

Edited November 4 by JimTripper

[RSD1]

5 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Since when was Po*nhub the only site on the internet?

Really? Didn't know that. Do tell...

[thaibeachlovers]

7 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

The body requires constant shaving and plucking to stay managable.

Seriously? If it takes that much work to get a woman to go out with you I'm really happy I don't bother any more.

[thaibeachlovers]

31 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

Forget MBK. One has to visit Central Ladprao on a weekend. Any of the floors. The visuals there will surely fix any Mr. Softee problems. 
 

but are they on the internet? It's a bit far for me to drop by to see if I agree with you.

[RSD1]

11 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

but are they on the internet? It's a bit far for me to drop by to see if I agree with you.

Dunno, but I doubt watching footage on the Internet of pretty girls walking around a shopping mall is going to have the same desired effect as seeing them in real life. Sounds like it's time for you to put down your computer mouse and your baby oil and get your arse on an airplane.

 

That aside, the reason I suggested Central Ladprao is because you're gonna see a lot of local girls with more natural beauty and less of the ones that are trying so hard and wearing expensive branded clothing like you might see more of in the malls in the city center. It's probably got the best amalgamation of naturally pretty girls that I've seen anywhere in Bangkok.

 

Edited November 4 by RSD1

[thaibeachlovers]

3 minutes ago, RSD1 said:

Dunno, but I doubt watching footage on the Internet of pretty girls walking around a shopping mall is going to have the same desired effect as seeing them in real life. Sounds like it's time for you to put down your computer mouse and your baby oil and get your arse on an airplane.

 

That aside, the reason I suggested Central Ladprao is because you're gonna see a lot of local girls with more natural beauty and less of the ones that are trying so hard and wearing expensive branded clothing like you might see more of in the malls in the city center. It's probably got the best amalgamation of naturally pretty girls that I've seen anywhere in Bangkok.

 

I'd love to go back, but unless you want to shout me an all expenses paid trip it's not going to happen. NZ is too expensive to save anything from a pension- I spent the 800,000 baht I transferred to NZ long ago. I had to buy a car as no public transport worth a damn where I live, and they cost biggly.

[JimTripper]

18 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Seriously? If it takes that much work to get a woman to go out with you I'm really happy I don't bother any more.

I did a full body clip just yesterday (no clipper guard), followed by a towel alcohol wipe. I feel great! It's a full pruning, which includes squatting over a mirror to get those hidden areas. I'm using a razor for my balls and ass for complete control (I don't recommend the clipper).

 

Can you do that for me today? You're dirty & unclean and need to renew yourself.

[RSD1]

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

I'd love to go back, but unless you want to shout me an all expenses paid trip it's not going to happen. NZ is too expensive to save anything from a pension- I spent the 800,000 baht I transferred to NZ long ago. I had to buy a car as no public transport worth a damn where I live, and they cost biggly.

I hear ya. NZ is a place I still plan to visit one day. I almost made it last year, but shifted the travel plans elsewhere instead. Are you on the north or south isle?

[RSD1]

1 minute ago, JimTripper said:

I'm using a razor for my balls and ass for complete control

So glad you shared that with us. My day was really lacking in value and anything substantive before you posted this. Any photos you can share showing all aspects of the completed job would also be very much appreciated. 

[NowNow]

3 hours ago, SoCal1990 said:

Thank you for your response. It’s interesting, though, that instead of addressing the points I raised, you’ve chosen to sidestep with a few smiles and generalities rather than engage directly. This approach actually serves to reinforce some of the questions I asked about your motivations, as it suggests you may be avoiding self-reflection. If your life, as you describe, is genuinely as enriched and privileged as you suggest, it’s still unclear why you invest so much energy in critiquing people you view as “old” or “delusional.” The fact that you deflect any self-explanation by focusing on these other men only adds to the impression that you’re avoiding something within yourself.

 

It’s also hard not to notice how often you ride a moral high horse when it comes to relationships, suggesting that those who engage in casual encounters or pay for companionship are somehow missing out on the beauty of real connection. You paint them as shallow, as though their relationships—or lack of them—lack value or meaning. But from what I’ve seen, many of these men are fully aware of their choices. Some have had meaningful relationships in the past and are now only looking for physical connection or companionship, without the deeper commitment that you claim is essential. It’s curious that you seem to dismiss these choices as inherently inferior. Not everyone seeks the same kind of connection, and assuming that your perspective is the only valid one seems rather narrow for someone who positions himself as worldly and insightful.

 

Furthermore, your apparent condemnation of these men as exploiters or shallow pleasure-seekers seems rather one-sided. They’re simply engaging in mutually consensual exchanges with women who are also choosing to participate. It seems rather presumptive to assume harm in such arrangements when both parties are clear on the terms, and neither seems victimized. After all, these women are adults making their own decisions about how they earn a living, and assuming that they’re necessarily “misfortunate” or harmed by these interactions verges on condescension itself. Not every exchange of companionship is automatically devoid of respect or value, and it’s a stretch to judge these men—or the women involved—as lacking integrity based solely on choices that don’t align with your view of what relationships should be.

 

Given the nature of your interactions here, it’s hard not to wonder if you’re projecting behaviors onto others that are quite similar to your own. In various posts, you criticize others as being “sex tourists” or “obsessed” with subjects you deem beneath you. Yet by your own frequent engagement on these same topics, it seems possible that you may share a similar focus—perhaps even similar insecurities. If these topics are truly as distasteful and irrelevant to you as you claim, then it’s rather strange that you’re compelled to involve yourself in such endless “pissing matches.” I’m genuinely curious: does it give you some sense of control or superiority to dismiss these men and their choices while positioning yourself as distinct?

 

When you suggest that I’m attempting to “fill gaps with imagination,” it reads more as a convenient dodge than an actual response. If you believe the conclusions I’ve drawn are inaccurate, wouldn’t a more straightforward approach be to clarify why you’re here and why these discussions engage you so persistently? By dismissing the points as mere “imagination,” you’re only reinforcing the idea that your role in these exchanges may not be as different from those you judge as you’d like to believe.

 

You also describe yourself as somehow “beyond understanding,” as though you’re a complex enigma. But this “mystery” seems mostly an illusion, one you appear to cultivate by offering ambiguous responses rather than transparent reasoning. This only deepens the question: why do you invest so much energy in a forum you claim holds little appeal for you? If these men and their choices are indeed beneath you, what compels you to keep returning to critique them? This kind of behavior, as you surely know, often suggests some inner conflict, or perhaps a need to elevate oneself by comparison.

 

There’s also a distinct irony in your judgment of others for seeking out simple companionship or straightforward exchanges, particularly when you often claim a moral high ground. Isn’t it more intellectually honest to recognize that different people seek different things from relationships—and that none of these choices, when consensual, inherently lacks value? Real insight would acknowledge that not everyone shares your outlook, and that what seems shallow to you may hold meaning for others. You seem reluctant to consider that others may be more self-aware than you give them credit for; many know exactly what they’re looking for and are at peace with it. Your insistence on labeling their choices as misguided suggests that perhaps you’re not as open-minded or empathetic as you seem to believe.

 

Whatever the case, your pattern of engagement doesn’t seem to be bringing you the kind of respect or admiration you might hope for. Instead, it comes across as though you’re far more absorbed in the lives of people you look down on than you would like to admit. If you’re genuinely here to share wisdom or a different perspective, perhaps reconsidering your approach could yield a better result. Otherwise, your attempts to cast yourself as a figure “above” the fray only seem to blur the lines between you and those you’re criticizing.

 

If there’s one thing that seems consistently missing from your comments, it’s empathy. Your tendency to label others’ choices as misguided without taking time to truly understand their backgrounds or intentions suggests a lack of openness to perspectives other than your own. Real insight would mean acknowledging that different people may have valid reasons for making different choices, without automatically assuming these choices are “wrong” or “beneath” you. And perhaps this is something worth considering: genuine growth and understanding often require more empathy than judgment, and a willingness to respect—even if not agree with—the diverse paths others have chosen.

 

So, I’d encourage you to pause and consider why these exchanges hold your attention so strongly. If your circumstances are indeed different from those you criticize, then why remain here? If you don’t find any value in these discussions or the people in them, then what are you gaining? And if you’re here to “enlighten” others, perhaps a less dismissive approach would be more effective.

 

In the end, the very fact that you feel the need to disparage others’ choices suggests an insecurity in your own. Real self-assurance doesn’t need to prop itself up by putting others down or casting judgment on mutually consensual relationships that bring others comfort or satisfaction. After all, each person’s path is uniquely their own. Maybe your energy would be better spent questioning why you hold such a persistent need to “correct” others—many of whom seem to have reached a far more honest level of self-acceptance than you’re willing to grant.

 

Dear @SoCal1990

 

Allow me to explain how conversation works and does not work 😊

What works is making your point concisely in order to keep your subjects engaged. What doesn't work is to talk incessantly or to write a wall of text, expecting people to be interested enough to stay engaged. Most will either tune out or simply bypass.

Are you a crashing bore in real life?

Then of course is the arrogant assertion that I need to "address all of the points you have made" 😊 I don't even remember what you wrote.

If you wish to engage me in conversation, please follow the normal etiquette or risk being ignored. A shame that I needed to explain that to you. Has no one told you that before?

 

 

Notwithstanding, I can give you a reply without needing to read your wall of text.

This is social media, not 'real life'. In person you can assess the situation on an individual basis and behave accordingly. For example, if I see a thirsty old man walking along with a young local girl, I'm not going to say anything about it to him. What I think about it is another matter. Similarly, he's not going to stand up on a soapbox to tell us all about his ED and what he takes to supplement his performance so he can plug that 24 year old girl. If he did that, he'd likely get a reaction from the public.

Do you see where I am going with this?

Don't do something the majority of the public would find disgusting and not expect that someone expresses disgust.

That it upsets someone, that many find the thought of a wrinkly old man forcing himself on a woman forty years his junior, is nothing to do with me. I simply voice what the majority of the population really think about it. If he didn't announce it proudly, likely no one would say anything at all.

If the protagonist doesn't want to know, then better not to read or to undertake the action in the first place.

If you cannot stand the heat...

 

 

 

[Alpha84]

16 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

It's a full pruning, which includes squatting over a mirror to get those hidden areas. I'm using a razor for my balls and ass for complete control (I don't recommend the clipper).

But nobody asked. Just feeling blessed right now though that I wasn’t forced to share the view with your mirror.

[NowNow]

19 minutes ago, JimTripper said:

I did a full body clip just yesterday (no clipper guard), followed by a towel alcohol wipe. I feel great! It's a full pruning, which includes squatting over a mirror to get those hidden areas. I'm using a razor for my balls and ass for complete control (I don't recommend the clipper).

 

Can you do that for me today? You're dirty & unclean and need to renew yourself.

 

I guess @RSD1 no longer believes we are the same person 😊

Another swing and a miss 😊

[SoCal1990]

20 minutes ago, NowNow said:

Dear @SoCal1990

 

Allow me to explain how conversation works and does not work 😊

What works is making your point concisely in order to keep your subjects engaged. What doesn't work is to talk incessantly or to write a wall of text, expecting people to be interested enough to stay engaged. Most will either tune out or simply bypass.

Are you a crashing bore in real life?

Then of course is the arrogant assertion that I need to "address all of the points you have made" 😊 I don't even remember what you wrote.

If you wish to engage me in conversation, please follow the normal etiquette or risk being ignored. A shame that I needed to explain that to you. Has no one told you that before?

 

 

Notwithstanding, I can give you a reply without needing to read your wall of text.

This is social media, not 'real life'. In person you can assess the situation on an individual basis and behave accordingly. For example, if I see a thirsty old man walking along with a young local girl, I'm not going to say anything about it to him. What I think about it is another matter. Similarly, he's not going to stand up on a soapbox to tell us all about his ED and what he takes to supplement his performance so he can plug that 24 year old girl. If he did that, he'd likely get a reaction from the public.

Do you see where I am going with this?

Don't do something the majority of the public would find disgusting and not expect that someone expresses disgust.

That it upsets someone, that many find the thought of a wrinkly old man forcing himself on a woman forty years his junior, is nothing to do with me. I simply voice what the majority of the population really think about it. If he didn't announce it proudly, likely no one would say anything at all.

If the protagonist doesn't want to know, then better not to read or to undertake the action in the first place.

If you cannot stand the heat...

 

Thank you for your reply. It’s amusing that you advise on the art of conversation while resorting to a response that largely ignores the complexities of the points raised. Your focus on conciseness is noted, yet it appears you’ve overlooked the depth of discussion that meaningful exchanges often require. Dismissing a “wall of text” without engaging with its content suggests a reluctance to grapple with ideas that challenge your assertions—and perhaps even reflects your own laziness in engaging with complex thoughts. It seems that your preference for brevity is more about your inability to keep up with a nuanced argument than any real understanding of effective communication, revealing you as a lazy thinker.

 

You claim that you don’t remember what I wrote, which could imply either a selective memory or a disinterest in engaging with substance. However, the topics at hand—moral judgments about relationships, the nature of consent, and the dynamics of social engagement—are not trivial matters that can be simply bypassed. In fact, your attempts to reduce the complexity of such interactions to a mere assertion of public sentiment speaks more to your avoidance than to any clear argument. Perhaps you’re more interested in performing for an imaginary audience than in addressing the ideas presented, which makes you seem even more pretentious.

 

Your analogy about observing a “thirsty old man” with a younger companion is interesting, yet it reveals a tendency to project your own subjective views onto others rather than considering the nuances of their situations. You mention that such a man would not publicly discuss his personal life, which raises the question: why do you feel justified in casting judgment on others’ choices? Is it not possible that your views reflect your own biases rather than a collective consensus? Moreover, by labeling their interactions as “disgusting,” you risk oversimplifying the dynamics at play—both in terms of relationships and the reasons individuals seek companionship. It’s almost as if you’re desperate to assert moral superiority, but it only serves to expose your own weak shortcomings.

 

Your approach suggests that you equate vocalizing disdain with moral clarity, but it’s worth considering whether this perspective might itself be a reflection of insecurity. What drives someone to comment on the lives of others so vehemently? If your perspective is truly representative of societal views, what does that say about the diversity of thought and experience that exists beyond your own? Real engagement with a topic requires a willingness to explore its complexities rather than relying on generalized assumptions. It’s clear that your ability to grasp these complexities is severely limited, making you appear like a superficial simpleton relying on shallow criticisms instead.

 

You also seem to suggest that if someone cannot “stand the heat,” they should avoid particular discussions. However, isn’t it crucial to challenge our discomfort and explore it rather than shy away from it? Conversations around morality and relationships often elicit strong emotions, yet they are also opportunities for growth and understanding. To label those discussions as beneath you may protect your own unjustified sense of superiority but does little to advance the conversation.

 

In your concluding remarks, you imply that the burden of discomfort lies with those you criticize. Yet, perhaps the more enlightening perspective would be to consider how your own judgments reflect your inner landscape. Why do you feel compelled to speak out against the choices of others? Engaging in such critique can be a pathway to deeper self-reflection—something that may ultimately lead to more meaningful conversations and insights. The real question is whether you’re capable of that kind of introspection or if you’re just a coward too busy patting yourself on the back for your perceived moral high ground.

 

In essence, your dismissal of longer responses might not stem from a genuine preference for brevity but rather a reluctance to invest the effort needed to engage with thoughtful discourse. If you truly seek to advance conversation rather than deflect from it, consider taking the time to address the substance of what’s being said rather than retreating into a superficial critique of style.

 

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this, provided you can move beyond surface-level critique into a more genuine exploration of these ideas. After all, meaningful discourse often lies in the willingness to engage with what makes us uncomfortable rather than dismissing it outright. 

[scubascuba3]

54 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

Dear @SoCal1990

 

Allow me to explain how conversation works and does not work 😊

What works is making your point concisely in order to keep your subjects engaged. What doesn't work is to talk incessantly or to write a wall of text, expecting people to be interested enough to stay engaged. Most will either tune out or simply bypass.

Are you a crashing bore in real life?

Then of course is the arrogant assertion that I need to "address all of the points you have made" 😊 I don't even remember what you wrote.

If you wish to engage me in conversation, please follow the normal etiquette or risk being ignored. A shame that I needed to explain that to you. Has no one told you that before?

 

 

Notwithstanding, I can give you a reply without needing to read your wall of text.

This is social media, not 'real life'. In person you can assess the situation on an individual basis and behave accordingly. For example, if I see a thirsty old man walking along with a young local girl, I'm not going to say anything about it to him. What I think about it is another matter. Similarly, he's not going to stand up on a soapbox to tell us all about his ED and what he takes to supplement his performance so he can plug that 24 year old girl. If he did that, he'd likely get a reaction from the public.

Do you see where I am going with this?

Don't do something the majority of the public would find disgusting and not expect that someone expresses disgust.

That it upsets someone, that many find the thought of a wrinkly old man forcing himself on a woman forty years his junior, is nothing to do with me. I simply voice what the majority of the population really think about it. If he didn't announce it proudly, likely no one would say anything at all.

If the protagonist doesn't want to know, then better not to read or to undertake the action in the first place.

If you cannot stand the heat...

 

 

 

His post was far better than all yours put together, you can only dream of writing something that good

[NowNow]

Just now, scubascuba3 said:

His post was far better than all yours put together, you can only dream of writing something that good

 

That's nice for you 😊

[NowNow]

31 minutes ago, SoCal1990 said:

 

Thank you for your reply. It’s amusing that you advise on the art of conversation while resorting to a response that largely ignores the complexities of the points raised. Your focus on conciseness is noted, yet it appears you’ve overlooked the depth of discussion that meaningful exchanges often require. Dismissing a “wall of text” without engaging with its content suggests a reluctance to grapple with ideas that challenge your assertions—and perhaps even reflects your own laziness in engaging with complex thoughts. It seems that your preference for brevity is more about your inability to keep up with a nuanced argument than any real understanding of effective communication, revealing you as a lazy thinker.

 

You claim that you don’t remember what I wrote, which could imply either a selective memory or a disinterest in engaging with substance. However, the topics at hand—moral judgments about relationships, the nature of consent, and the dynamics of social engagement—are not trivial matters that can be simply bypassed. In fact, your attempts to reduce the complexity of such interactions to a mere assertion of public sentiment speaks more to your avoidance than to any clear argument. Perhaps you’re more interested in performing for an imaginary audience than in addressing the ideas presented, which makes you seem even more pretentious.

 

Your analogy about observing a “thirsty old man” with a younger companion is interesting, yet it reveals a tendency to project your own subjective views onto others rather than considering the nuances of their situations. You mention that such a man would not publicly discuss his personal life, which raises the question: why do you feel justified in casting judgment on others’ choices? Is it not possible that your views reflect your own biases rather than a collective consensus? Moreover, by labeling their interactions as “disgusting,” you risk oversimplifying the dynamics at play—both in terms of relationships and the reasons individuals seek companionship. It’s almost as if you’re desperate to assert moral superiority, but it only serves to expose your own weak shortcomings.

 

Your approach suggests that you equate vocalizing disdain with moral clarity, but it’s worth considering whether this perspective might itself be a reflection of insecurity. What drives someone to comment on the lives of others so vehemently? If your perspective is truly representative of societal views, what does that say about the diversity of thought and experience that exists beyond your own? Real engagement with a topic requires a willingness to explore its complexities rather than relying on generalized assumptions. It’s clear that your ability to grasp these complexities is severely limited, making you appear like a superficial simpleton relying on shallow criticisms instead.

 

You also seem to suggest that if someone cannot “stand the heat,” they should avoid particular discussions. However, isn’t it crucial to challenge our discomfort and explore it rather than shy away from it? Conversations around morality and relationships often elicit strong emotions, yet they are also opportunities for growth and understanding. To label those discussions as beneath you may protect your own unjustified sense of superiority but does little to advance the conversation.

 

In your concluding remarks, you imply that the burden of discomfort lies with those you criticize. Yet, perhaps the more enlightening perspective would be to consider how your own judgments reflect your inner landscape. Why do you feel compelled to speak out against the choices of others? Engaging in such critique can be a pathway to deeper self-reflection—something that may ultimately lead to more meaningful conversations and insights. The real question is whether you’re capable of that kind of introspection or if you’re just a coward too busy patting yourself on the back for your perceived moral high ground.

 

In essence, your dismissal of longer responses might not stem from a genuine preference for brevity but rather a reluctance to invest the effort needed to engage with thoughtful discourse. If you truly seek to advance conversation rather than deflect from it, consider taking the time to address the substance of what’s being said rather than retreating into a superficial critique of style.

 

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this, provided you can move beyond surface-level critique into a more genuine exploration of these ideas. After all, meaningful discourse often lies in the willingness to engage with what makes us uncomfortable rather than dismissing it outright. 

 

Another wall of text, admittedly of no interest to me. We have a finite time in this form and decide for ourselves as to how we would prefer to utilise it. 

I prefer to not engage with your word salad. But at least you have a reader in @scubascuba3 So it wasn't a complete waste of your time 🤗

 

[SoCal1990]

11 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

Another wall of text, admittedly of no interest to me. We have a finite time in this form and decide for ourselves as to how we would prefer to utilise it. 

I prefer to not engage with your word salad. But at least you have a reader in @scubascuba3 So it wasn't a complete waste of your time 🤗

 

 

It’s revealing that you dismiss a genuine response as “word salad” and a “wall of text” rather than addressing any point with depth. You speak of “finite time,” yet seem to spend yours on brief, dismissive replies while sidestepping any real engagement.

 

One might wonder if the real issue isn’t actually time, but rather a reluctance to consider perspectives that disrupt quick, comfortable judgments. Real dialogue, after all, requires a bit more than cursory remarks.

 

You often imply you’re above these discussions, but your continual deflection suggests otherwise. If the critique truly didn’t matter, would you keep responding? Perhaps there’s something worth unpacking here, should you decide to engage a little more earnestly. I’ll look forward to your thoughts.

[Bundooman]

On 10/29/2024 at 10:14 PM, MalcolmB said:

I don’t like men. 
I like boobs. If I can play with boobs for five minutes I am good.

 

So, within 5 minutes - you have a happy ending?

[georgegeorgia]

Just now, Bundooman said:

So, within 5 minutes - you have a happy ending?

Maybe better luck with your big man boobs Bundooman 

As a matter of interest is your name connected to the Australian country  town where no one has a job ?