Jump to content

Trump White House Official Calls for Trump to Be Arrested for Threatening Liz Cheney


shdmn

Recommended Posts

When Trump is reduced to performing simulated sex on stage, and commiting multiple gaffes, the Trumpers are taking their eyes off the ball - the disasterous early voting numbers.

 

Maybe the Trumpers can describe Trump's turnout organization for Election Day. 

 

We'll wait.

 

Meanwhile, in the Real World:

 

Elon Musk-backed super PAC hit with class action lawsuit from its canvassers

 

These are the people responsible for getting out the vote for Trump on Tuesday. Instead, they are suing Elon.

Edited by Danderman123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Did you know that a million people have died as a result of Putin's decision to invade Ukraine?

Too bad Biden-Harris looked so weak, he have never gone in.Biden-Harris, the “Appeaser in Chief”

 

All those lives wasted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shdmn said:

This is easily the dumbest thing I have read today.  Then again this is AN and the day isn't over.

 

You can't be seriously!

 

Candidate:  "We need boots on the ground to defend Latveria!"

Heckler:  "You first, tough guy!  I'll pay for your flight to the front!"

 

Shirley, you don't consider that a threat!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

I'm not talking about the Liz Cheney quote, but rather the consequences.

 

In the late stages of a political campaign, if you are explaining, you are losing. And Trump has spent 2 days explaining.

 

It's so bad that Trump had to pull a stunt that will change the subject, but cost him votes on Tuesday.

 

Talk about what you want.

I thought we were talking about Trump's alleged "threat."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NoDisplayName said:

 

You can't be seriously!

 

Candidate:  "We need boots on the ground to defend Latveria!"

Heckler:  "You first, tough guy!  I'll pay for your flight to the front!"

 

Shirley, you don't consider that a threat!!

Don’t call her Shirley! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still waiting for the blue blinkered radical progressive left supporters on here to defend this attack on Trump which is clearly and undeniably a lie. No ad hominem attack on me, no deflection just a defense of what the legacy media and Harris have accused Trump of saying.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

Cheney, Trump said, "is a very dumb individual, very dumb. She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK? Let's see how she feels about it, you know when the guns are trained on her face."

 

Spin it anyway you want. In context with the insults it's a death threat.

 

Interesting that you cut the quote off at that point.

Very convenient for the narrative.

Why not include the next sentence?

 

"You know they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying 'oh gee, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

In your country, they have kings.

 

Not in the US.

 

Was Elvis the king ?

I can see humor is not a big thing for you.

Bet you get invited to all the best parties.  :cheesy:

zzz.PNG

Edited by quake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Gone a bit quiet on here from the blue blinkered brigade. What can't prove otherwise that Trump has been completely taken out of context in yet another attack from the left? As an aside Harris says her party offers a new generation of leaders. Harris, Waltz and Cheney are the new generation? Also as it stands it seems the actual sitting President of the United States and the leader of the Free World has been locked in the basement for calling Trump supporters garbage.

 

 

Tone deaf? He's trying to play both sides of the street. It is unacceptable to invoke firearms when talking disparagingly about ones opponent, especially using words like "sleezebag". There can be no mistaking this dog whistle. The apologists for Trump are trying anything other than face facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

Cheney, Trump said, "is a very dumb individual, very dumb. She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK? Let's see how she feels about it, you know when the guns are trained on her face."

 

Spin it anyway you want. In context with the insults it's a death threat.

Maybe you can repost your comment with what was actually said and not your biased edit of it. Seems like you left out the entirety of the context just like the legacy media and Harris did. I don't see the point. It's clear that this misrepresentation is nothing but a lie. Here it is.

Starts at 7:20.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Tone deaf? He's trying to play both sides of the street. It is unacceptable to invoke firearms when talking disparagingly about ones opponent, especially using words like "sleezebag". There can be no mistaking this dog whistle. The apologists for Trump are trying anything other than face facts.

Wrong again. He was talking about war. See above vid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Maybe you can repost your comment with what was actually said and not your biased edit of it. Seems like you left out the entirety of the context just like the legacy media and Harris did. I don't see the point. It's clear that this misrepresentation is nothing but a lie. Here it is.

Starts at 7:20.

 

 

Still can't grasp the concept? There is no context in which invoking firearms in respect to a political opponent is not an incitement to violence. None.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

death threats, yeah right, lets see how she feel about being shot as as she is a war hawk , her father was 1 of the architects of the iraq war, if youre defending her, that means you also support the deaths of 1 million people

Trump was right.

 

It's always been the same. The rich sending the poor to die in nonsense wars.

 

If she, or her loved ones, had to go to the front line, she wouldn't be so keen to wage wars.

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, John Drake said:

"Trump White House Official" for ten days. Not a good look for Scaramucci or Trump. Scaramucci is unhinged. And this exemplifies more of Trump's bad hiring practices.

Am I reading this correctly? The orange Jesus, stable genius and smart businessman is incapable of picking competent people to work for him?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lacessit said:

Am I reading this correctly? The orange Jesus, stable genius and smart businessman is incapable of picking competent people to work for him?

 

He had some decent hires. They all hate him now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think more appropriate, would be mental evaluation by experts in the field of fruitcake loons.........:crazy:

 

Trumps firing squad thing, a bloke who wants to be the USA President...........😱

 

Now, come on.................🤔

 

I bet there are a load of early voters out there that are now thinking.....

 

"What on earth have I done"....🥺

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pattayasan said:

Still can't grasp the concept? There is no context in which invoking firearms in respect to a political opponent is not an incitement to violence. None.

Well you truly are demonstrating the obtuseness of your position. I have supplied you with what Trump actually said. Nothing at all to do with invoking firearms and violence and any reasonable person can see this. It's all about Cheney being a war hawk and that she really wouldn't like it she was in the firing line along with the soldiers she wants to send to war. Very easy to understand if you actually bother to watch what he actually said. It's got nothing to do with some obscure concept that exists only in some people's minds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, owl sees all said:

Trump was right.

 

It's always been the same. The rich sending the poor to die in nonsense wars.

 

If she, or her loved ones, had to go to the front line, she wouldn't be so keen to wage wars.

Exactly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dinsdale said:

Well you truly are demonstrating the obtuseness of your position. I have supplied you with what Trump actually said. Nothing at all to do with invoking firearms and violence and any reasonable person can see this. It's all about Cheney being a war hawk and that she really wouldn't like it she was in the firing line along with the soldiers she wants to send to war. Very easy to understand if you actually bother to watch what he actually said. It's got nothing to do with some obscure concept that exists only in some people's minds. 

 

Trump didn't mention firearms and Cheney in the same paragraph?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

When Trump is reduced to performing simulated sex on stage, and commiting multiple gaffes, the Trumpers are taking their eyes off the ball - the disasterous early voting numbers.

 

Maybe the Trumpers can describe Trump's turnout organization for Election Day. 

 

We'll wait.

 

Meanwhile, in the Real World:

 

Elon Musk-backed super PAC hit with class action lawsuit from its canvassers

 

These are the people responsible for getting out the vote for Trump on Tuesday. Instead, they are suing Elon.

Yawn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, transam said:

I think more appropriate, would be mental evaluation by experts in the field of fruitcake loons.........:crazy:

 

Trumps firing squad thing, a bloke who wants to be the USA President...........😱

 

Now, come on.................🤔

 

I bet there are a load of early voters out there that are now thinking.....

 

"What on earth have I done"....🥺

 

What kind of firing squad gives the condemned a rifle?

A cigarette and blindfold, sure, but a rifle?

 

Who do you give a rifle to?  The sons of po' folks without connections, sending them to the front to die for Boeing, while you sit back and congratulate each other for "doing something."

 

Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her. OK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...