Jump to content

Avoid homes with Trump signs Fema Supervisor told disaster workers in FLA


Recommended Posts

Posted

Can you imagine a federal agency supervisor telling subordinates not to help other Americans in a disaster,

because of their political beliefs!

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, riclag said:

Can you imagine a federal agency supervisor telling subordinates not to help other Americans in a disaster,

because of their political beliefs!

 

In a word.  Yes.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

When there are gangs of MAGA thugs out "Hunting" FEMA workers with high powered weapons? A warning like that makes total sense.

You lost get over it!

 

no sources to back your claims .

And if by chance high powered weapons did play into it because Florida is big in the second amendment rights and will hold looters accountable. A police presence accompanying Fema would of cut through that!

  • Sad 1
Posted
4 hours ago, riclag said:

Can you imagine a federal agency supervisor telling subordinates not to help other Americans in a disaster,

because of their political beliefs!

 

 

Considering trump is going to replace fed govt employee with "loyalists' one can expect such actions in the future. However, under trump they would not be fired as is the case with the subject employees.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, mogandave said:

He will not replace any more that Obama or Biden did.

 

Your press didn’t tell that every President does this, did they? 

 

One of Trump’s biggest mistakes in his first tern was allowing too many Obama holdovers. 

 

The people in the. executive branch are supposed to be loyal to the President. If they don’t want to be loyal, they should quit. 

 

Yes I'm aware of change of personnel, but not the criteria of declaring loyalty to an individual as is the declared intent of trump world which I assume is contrary to Constitutional ethics. I note trump has yet to sign the required ethics agreements for transition of government processes.

 

https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/trump-transition-planning-ethics-agreements-biden-rcna179452

Edited by simple1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 hours ago, mogandave said:

I and not aware of anyone having to swear an oath to Trump above all else. Do you have evidence of such? 

 

A lot of insiders sabotaged his first term. I applaud his diligence. 

 

Is Trump refusing to sign sign the agreement or he just hads not signed it yet? 

 

Does he not want to sine anything that woukd stop him from being a fascist or a dictator? 

 

msnbc, that’s hilarious 

 

Previously Schedule F:

 

On Wednesday, the president signed an executive order creating a new category of federal employees. Top officials could classify positions as having “a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.” Then they could sweep employees holding those positions into a new “Schedule F,” where employees would lose all protections, including those against discrimination, forced reassignments and relocations, and any rights to organize or appeal personnel decisions, for example. Most important, employees could be dismissed for any reason whatsoever. 

 

https://www.govexec.com/management/2020/10/trumps-order-sets-stage-loyalty-tests-thousands-feds/169492/

 

Now - transition cochair...

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-white-house-loyalty-b2625363.html

 

Republicans prepare the trump Loyalty Oath

 

National Republican Senatorial Committee chair Steve Daines has been “aggressively lobbying” senators to make their Trump endorsement now, before the blacklisting begins. House members and G.O.P. operatives aren’t far behind.

Posted
12 hours ago, mogandave said:

The people in the. executive branch are supposed to be loyal to the President

 

No. They swear an Oath to support the Constitution, not to support unlawful actions contrary to the Constitution by a President

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

Previously Schedule F:

 

On Wednesday, the president signed an executive order creating a new category of federal employees. Top officials could classify positions as having “a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.” Then they could sweep employees holding those positions into a new “Schedule F,” where employees would lose all protections, including those against discrimination, forced reassignments and relocations, and any rights to organize or appeal personnel decisions, for example. Most important, employees could be dismissed for any reason whatsoever. 

 

https://www.govexec.com/management/2020/10/trumps-order-sets-stage-loyalty-tests-thousands-feds/169492/

 

Now - transition cochair...

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-white-house-loyalty-b2625363.html

 

Republicans prepare the trump Loyalty Oath

 

National Republican Senatorial Committee chair Steve Daines has been “aggressively lobbying” senators to make their Trump endorsement now, before the blacklisting begins. House members and G.O.P. operatives aren’t far behind.

So I was right, thanks 

  • Like 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

No. They swear an Oath to support the Constitution, not to support unlawful actions contrary to the Constitution by a President

And as long as their loyalty to the President does not interfere with their oath to support the Constitution, they should do so. 

 

Members of the Biden Administration, Harris included, by lying about his condition were being loyal to Biden, while ignoring their oath to the Constitution. Should they be prosecuted?

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, mogandave said:

So I was right, thanks 

 

Right now we don't know how the "Loyalty Oath" will be sworn / actioned. One would think that swearing the OATH to Defend and Protect the Constitution would be sufficient, rather than also demanding a sworn Oath to an individual. Reminds me when trump was in power the Cabinet members were belittled by trump quite nauseating.

 

 

Edited by simple1
Posted
1 hour ago, riclag said:

Sad when a state( Fla) can’t trust the Biden / Harris administrations Fema head officials to be transparent in details , so they’ll perform  their own investigation ! 

Unfortunately, that public distrust extends to most other fed govt agencies as they all appear to have been politically weaponized by the current regime

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, nattaya09 said:

Unfortunately, that public distrust extends to most other fed govt agencies as they all appear to have been politically weaponized by the current regime

You have been tuned in and 100 % correct!

Florida has also implemented its own Trump  Assassination investigation!

The FLA AG doesnt trust the same FBI leadership that raided Mar Lago to be transparent in their investigations.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4889479-florida-desantis-investigation-trump-attempt/

Edited by riclag
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/11/2024 at 8:28 PM, nattaya09 said:

Unfortunately, that public distrust extends to most other fed govt agencies as they all appear to have been politically weaponized by the current regime

Fema worker said it was common practice. “Its wasn’t a isolated incident “

 

The accused said shes is being hung out to dry.


https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/us-news/fema-worker-accused-of-telling-staff-to-skip-hurricane-ravaged-trump-homes-claims-it-was-common-practice-this-is-not-isolated/

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/10/2024 at 5:23 PM, impulse said:

In a word.  Yes.

Probably worried about being shot when they knocked on the door because of right wing paranoia about looting. Especially if the worker is black.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...