The Guardian Steps Back from Elon Musk’s Platform X Amid Content Concerns

[BangkokReady]

13 hours ago, Social Media said:

Concerns over “far-right conspiracy theories and racism” have long troubled the Guardian regarding X

 

I feel like "have long been pushed but the Guardian, due to X not toeing the progressive line" would be more appropriate.

[frank83628]

8 minutes ago, riclag said:

Im a frequent on Twitter ! I’m very cautious of the parody accounts!

News and members using elons name& Trump familys names!

 

After a while  one gets to know the provocateurs. It very simple to distinguish the truth imop

 

i look forward to Musks version of google, so tired of searches only giving  msm BS results, so corrupted and bias to the left establishment. really hoping Trump, musk, rfk, Tulsi and his cabinet expose them all.. 

[riclag]

28 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

i look forward to Musks version of google, so tired of searches only giving  msm BS results, so corrupted and bias to the left establishment. really hoping Trump, musk, rfk, Tulsi and his cabinet expose them all.. 

spot on!

I contributed a lot of threads on the sub forum. If I didn’t choose Fox or NYP in the search terms , it would resulted in the bias media’s coverage!

That would of stopped me from posting !

Edited 1 hour ago by riclag

[riclag]

36 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

I feel like "have long been pushed but the Guardian, due to X not toeing the progressive line" would be more appropriate.

Short and to the point!

Well said

[BigStar]

4 hours ago, Purdey said:

The Guardian beats right wing news by far, being ranked one of the most read newspapers in the world.

 

Got that hard news for libs.

 

 

4 hours ago, Purdey said:

In fact no right wing newspaper is in any ranking. Even in the US.

https://www.internationaljournalofresearch.org/2024/03/top-ten-most-read-newspaper-in-world.html?m=1

 

Right leaning are, which leftists also call right wing as part of the fearmongering. The Wall Street Journal is mentioned in your linked reference. I doubt you know which way all the others lean. The Guardian isn't exactly far left, so far as I know. Far left "newspapers" like The Morning Star or The News Line also have poor circulation and even depend on donations to stay alive.

 

 

I suspect The Guardian feels that the negative readers' responses and the fact checking in Community Notes, now that X has free speech, did more harm than good by exposing their "news" as leftist nonsense. Such exposure by alternative right-leaning media, including mainstream FOX, is responsible for the misfortunes of CNN and MSNBC, now laying off staff, including, supposedly, some of the higher profile contributors. 

 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by BigStar

[proton]

Nobody reads the Guardian except teachers, students, social workers and posh <deleted>.

[candide]

56 minutes ago, riclag said:

spot on!

I contributed a lot of threads on the sub forum. If I didn’t choose Fox or NYP in the search terms , it would resulted in the bias media’s coverage!

That would of stopped me from posting !

We already know that! You specifically focused on Fox and the NYC and ignored all the others! 🤣

[pattayasan]

9 hours ago, Dave0206 said:

Yes free speech followed by a lawsuit if companies decide they don't want to spend there advertising money next to bastions of truth like Alex Jones

 

You've got to be joking, surely? A lawsuit to tell a company where to spend its money?

[pattayasan]

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

i look forward to Musks version of google, so tired of searches only giving  msm BS results, so corrupted and bias to the left establishment. really hoping Trump, musk, rfk, Tulsi and his cabinet expose them all.. 

 

I can just see the look on your fave when Musk Search returns identical results. LOL.

[pattayasan]

17 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Got that hard news for libs.

 

 

 

Right leaning are, which leftists also call right wing as part of the fearmongering. The Wall Street Journal is mentioned in your linked reference. I doubt you know which way all the others lean. The Guardian isn't exactly far left, so far as I know. Far left "newspapers" like The Morning Star or The News Line also have poor circulation and even depend on donations to stay alive.

 

 

I suspect The Guardian feels that the negative readers' responses and the fact checking in Community Notes, now that X has free speech, did more harm than good by exposing their "news" as leftist nonsense. Such exposure by alternative right-leaning media, including mainstream FOX, is responsible for the misfortunes of CNN and MSNBC, now laying off staff, including, supposedly, some of the higher profile contributors. 

 

 

 

I really wish you'd posted a link so we could see what she actually said instead of what you want us to believe she said.

 

The Guardian is not a suburban newspaper.

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

I can just see the look on your fave when Musk Search returns identical results. LOL.

Do you think he would bother if it was going to give the same results? Think before typing

[pattayasan]

Just now, frank83628 said:

Do you think he would bother if it was going to give the same results? Think before typing

 

TBH, I didn't even know (and still don't) that he was planning a search engine. Good luck to him, it'll wind up like Twitter.

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

TBH, I didn't even know (and still don't) that he was planning a search engine. Good luck to him, it'll wind up like Twitter.

What, you mean with an advertising boycott, which is being sued, also just goes to further prove the mainstream establishment bias.

"We only want our side of the story heard"

Cable channels lowest views in history, bye bye cnn, MSNBC and all that other trash.

[pattayasan]

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

What, you mean with an advertising boycott, which is being sued, also just goes to further prove the mainstream establishment bias.

"We only want our side of the story heard"

Cable channels lowest views in history, bye bye cnn, MSNBC and all that other trash.

 

Does the fact that they are being sued somehow mean they are wrong?

[pattayasan]

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

What, you mean with an advertising boycott, which is being sued, also just goes to further prove the mainstream establishment bias.

"We only want our side of the story heard"

Cable channels lowest views in history, bye bye cnn, MSNBC and all that other trash.

 

Most people get their news on demand from YT these days.

[John Drake]

The Guardian seems to pop up in my X-feed all the time. I never stop and look at it, however. It's entirely canned agitprop. Look, Fidel used to send me Granma back in the 60s, and it had more editorial freedom than the Guardian.

[BigStar]

44 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

really wish you'd posted a link so we could see what she actually said instead of what you want us to believe she said.

 

You know enough already, google it for yourself if you need more such blather. Reading the rag itself, you can find plenty more along the same lines. Yawn.

 

[Purdey]

1 hour ago, BigStar said:

 

Got that hard news for libs.

 

 

 

Right leaning are, which leftists also call right wing as part of the fearmongering. The Wall Street Journal is mentioned in your linked reference. I doubt you know which way all the others lean. The Guardian isn't exactly far left, so far as I know. Far left "newspapers" like The Morning Star or The News Line also have poor circulation and even depend on donations to stay alive.

 

 

I suspect The Guardian feels that the negative readers' responses and the fact checking in Community Notes, now that X has free speech, did more harm than good by exposing their "news" as leftist nonsense. Such exposure by alternative right-leaning media, including mainstream FOX, is responsible for the misfortunes of CNN and MSNBC, now laying off staff, including, supposedly, some of the higher profile contributors. 

 

 

Never read the Morning Star. Is it good? 

BTW. The Guardian is not left wing. Do you homework.

[Purdey]

2 hours ago, Dave0206 said:

You're giving right wing too much credit read are you sure? 

Hahaha! 

I do read Breibart now and then because I like a variety of viewpoints.