Jump to content

UK Pensioners in Thailand Face New Scrutiny Over Pension Fraud


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, petermik said:

give it a rest trans....we all know your position....we have ours...nowt better to do these days :whistling:

Too true,just another look another A1 tells u nobody has ever been punished for receiving unfrozen anywhere in the world,yet it knows of 2 plus at least another 3 at least.now someone is telling major porkies .and has been for last 10 years...... jealousy or wot?

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, BlueScouse said:

DWP Fraud, Error and Debt Bill. Statement from Liz Kendall on 8 October.

 

https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2024-10-08/hcws114

 

The Eligibility Verification measure will not give DWP access to any bank accounts, nor any information on how claimants spend their money. The proposed new power instead helps verify benefit eligibility, using very limited information from banks and financial institutions. A human being will always be involved in any investigations and any decisions taken afterwards that affect eligibility or benefit awards, as they do now. This measure will not be used on the State Pension.

 

 

Party on.....cheers.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 12/6/2024 at 9:42 AM, petermik said:

give it a rest trans....we all know your position....we have ours...nowt better to do these days :whistling:

Tell me, is this a chat thread for all to comment on with what ever views they have on the subject...?

 

As far as I am concerned, what ever is said here makes absolutely no difference to anything, yes/no...?

 

What it has shown me, is blokes who are on the fiddle must attack, which is a bit odd as nothing on here will change anything......:clap2:

 

What I don't like is folk making stories up, telling lies even and calling me a liar, which, I will NOT let go.

 

A bloke on here posts a lot with NO Gov. links, nothing, the same bloke that calls me and a member of staff, liars.....🤔

 

To remind you, nothing posted here changes anything, what ever you do is your business, and up to you......:thumbsup:

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, petermik said:

trans....sorry but your getting tiresome now.....let,s chat about Chinese MG cars instead 👍

No, I will get the same flack............😂

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, petermik said:

trans....sorry but your getting tiresome now.....let,s chat about Chinese MG cars instead 👍

 

Just now, transam said:

No, I will get the same flack............😂

Can`t think why.....:cheesy:

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, petermik said:

trans....sorry but your getting tiresome now.....let,s chat about Chinese MG cars instead 👍

 

 

I like my MG GS - have done for 5 years .

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, hotandsticky said:

 

 

I like my MG GS - have done for 5 years .

same same MG 5 18 months old 👍

but before a certain person chimes in......they`re not really MG thas knows but Chinese Saic cars....😂

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, petermik said:

same same MG 5 18 months old 👍

but before a certain person chimes in......they`re not really MG thas knows but Chinese Saic cars....😂

Indeed, Chinese with MG bling..............:whistling:

 

My chum has a 5 year old MG ZS with only 60kkm on the clock, he took it to MG to trade in, he was offered 180,000 for it, he walked.......😢

  • Confused 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, transam said:

Indeed, Chinese with MG bling..............:whistling:

 

My chum has a 5 year old MG ZS with only 60kkm on the clock, he took it to MG to trade in, he was offered 180,000 for it, he walked.......😢

that`s 100k more than I would have offered........:cheesy:

 

p.s. sorry but I cannot send you a Christmas card this year as them buggers running our country have stopped my winter fuel allowance.....and I,m skint :wai:

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, petermik said:

that`s 100k more than I would have offered........:cheesy:

 

p.s. sorry but I cannot send you a Christmas card this year as them buggers running our country have stopped my winter fuel allowance.....and I,m skint :wai:

I never received your previous ones...........😢

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 10:17 PM, petermik said:

Your speculation beggars belief.....there are millions in the UK claiming benefits in one form or another....so you seriously think they will target pensioners who have their pensions paid into a UK Bank as to are they actually resident or not :whistling:

I never said they would target them.  I said they may have the ability to pursue all their financial transactions if they decided to.  Your speculation and assumption is ...

  • Haha 1
Posted

I live in Thailand and worked here previously for 7 years and have a Thai spouse.

I began to receive my UK state pension in May 2023. Last May 2024 I did not receive the UK indexed linked increase to my monthly pension.

I discussed this with a former colleague / friend who lives in the Philippines with his Filipino spouse.

He told me that he does receive the annual increases to his UK state pension but was aware that UK citizens living in some other countries are not entitled to the same annual uplift.

I visited the UK.GOV DWP website to investigate this apparent anomaly. I was very surprised indeed to learn that is true.

This seems so unfair without ant reasonable basis!!!

Surely entitlement should be based on citizenship and contributions paid over the years of the working life and not on address of residence.

I think this case of unfairness should be put before the International Court of Human Rights if the House of Lords do not correct this blatantly wrong policy.

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, rustyhinges said:

I live in Thailand and worked here previously for 7 years and have a Thai spouse.

I began to receive my UK state pension in May 2023. Last May 2024 I did not receive the UK indexed linked increase to my monthly pension.

I discussed this with a former colleague / friend who lives in the Philippines with his Filipino spouse.

He told me that he does receive the annual increases to his UK state pension but was aware that UK citizens living in some other countries are not entitled to the same annual uplift.

I visited the UK.GOV DWP website to investigate this apparent anomaly. I was very surprised indeed to learn that is true.

This seems so unfair without ant reasonable basis!!!

Surely entitlement should be based on citizenship and contributions paid over the years of the working life and not on address of residence.

I think this case of unfairness should be put before the International Court of Human Rights if the House of Lords do not correct this blatantly wrong policy.

It did go to a court in the EU, forgot which, ....13 judges, 5 for, 8 against...........We lost..😢

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 11/15/2024 at 3:16 AM, Gottfrid said:

Yeah, all the Brits who moves to Thailand or lives here, knows the rules. Fair or unfair, has nothing to do with it. If they make a choice to move to Thailand, they will also make a choice to go by the rules. Break them, and sooner or later you will have to pay for it. Something that might be so hard that they can not stay in Thailand no more. 

 

Welcome to Thailand! Stop hiding and breaking the law. If you can´t afford it, Thailand is not for you. Then it´s better to chose a country where can get your full pension.

 

I think the situation is a little more complicated than you suggest.

It’s not always the case that there’s an easy choice. A case I read about, an elderly man’s wife died, and his daughter, who was living in Australia with her Australian husband and young children, suggested he went to live there as he no longer had any friends in the UK and of course didn’t see his grandchildren as much as he’d like. I have a similar situation with my granddaughters. That’s not a simple choice to make and not something that can be planned for. I’ve heard of several similar cases as well. 

When I first came to Thailand in 2008 to meet the woman who is now my wife there were a lot of things to think about, but my pension wasn’t one of them as I didn’t know how things would work out. Call me an old romantic but I wasn’t going to bring up ridiculous UK pension regulations when deciding whether to live with and marry my then girlfriend. At the time we decided to live in Thailand due to me being 15 years older and my son and daughter being adults whilst her daughter was 13. There wasn’t a firm plan, although I did think I might have to return full time to the UK if my health took a turn for the worse. I’m 70 now but OK so far. I also had in my mind that I’d be spending more time in the UK by now but amongst other things my wife’s mother is getting older so that makes it more difficult. Plans don’t always work out as you intend.

As for knowing the rules, that’s not so simple either. If you pack up and move completely then yes it’s straightforward and also if you move back in the same way. If however you move between the UK and, in my case Thailand then it’s complicated as there aren’t any actual rules as such. I did have a letter from the DWP setting out their method of determining residency but I can’t find it now. They look at whether your flights are return tickets, do you have family, do you have somewhere to live and do you have a car? That’s all I can remember. All departments have their own. HMRC is pretty clear but others use ‘ordinarily resident’ or ‘habitually resident’. I did phone the International Pension Centre early on to ask where I could find the rules. I was told they would be on the .gov.uk website. I said I’d looked and couldn’t find them and was told “They’ll be on there somewhere”. I mentioned this when I wrote to my MP and he couldn’t help either. On various calls when I’ve asked what would constitute becoming resident again, I’ve been told. “Being in the UK for 6 months”. I don’t know if that’s got to be continuous or not. “It’s not really just how long you’re here as it’s based on other things as well that help us decide if you’re resident or not”. On my last call when I pointed out that between early April 2024 and early March 2025 I would have been in the UK for 186 days, so more than 6 months, the woman said “Oh yes that would mean you are resident”. So I’m now resident, at least for now.

It’s not as simple as it sounds is it.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 12/9/2024 at 1:57 AM, gk10012001 said:

I never said they would target them.  I said they may have the ability to pursue all their financial transactions if they decided to.  Your speculation and assumption is ...

The difficulty is finding those who might be getting the increase when they aren't entitled to under the current rules. If they have a way to find people who are possibly infringing the rules then it becomes much easier. It's not difficult to investigate someone to find out where they are living. Their passport information should do that. I'm surprised they aren't using that already although that might only go back so far.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, kimamey said:

The difficulty is finding those who might be getting the increase when they aren't entitled to under the current rules. If they have a way to find people who are possibly infringing the rules then it becomes much easier. It's not difficult to investigate someone to find out where they are living. Their passport information should do that. I'm surprised they aren't using that already although that might only go back so far.

I just tell everyone I don't have a passport.

It's not as if it's a requirement to have one inside the UK.

  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, TheAppletons said:

 

  Have you considered purchasing a computer with a "return" button so you can create paragraphs?

Sorry about that.  I wrote it on Libre Office as I didn't have time to do it all at once. The formatting probably got lost in transfer and I didn't check. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
13 hours ago, kimamey said:

 

I think the situation is a little more complicated than you suggest.

It’s not always the case that there’s an easy choice. A case I read about, an elderly man’s wife died, and his daughter, who was living in Australia with her Australian husband and young children, suggested he went to live there as he no longer had any friends in the UK and of course didn’t see his grandchildren as much as he’d like. I have a similar situation with my granddaughters. That’s not a simple choice to make and not something that can be planned for. I’ve heard of several similar cases as well. 

When I first came to Thailand in 2008 to meet the woman who is now my wife there were a lot of things to think about, but my pension wasn’t one of them as I didn’t know how things would work out. Call me an old romantic but I wasn’t going to bring up ridiculous UK pension regulations when deciding whether to live with and marry my then girlfriend. At the time we decided to live in Thailand due to me being 15 years older and my son and daughter being adults whilst her daughter was 13. There wasn’t a firm plan, although I did think I might have to return full time to the UK if my health took a turn for the worse. I’m 70 now but OK so far. I also had in my mind that I’d be spending more time in the UK by now but amongst other things my wife’s mother is getting older so that makes it more difficult. Plans don’t always work out as you intend.

As for knowing the rules, that’s not so simple either. If you pack up and move completely then yes it’s straightforward and also if you move back in the same way. If however you move between the UK and, in my case Thailand then it’s complicated as there aren’t any actual rules as such. I did have a letter from the DWP setting out their method of determining residency but I can’t find it now. They look at whether your flights are return tickets, do you have family, do you have somewhere to live and do you have a car? That’s all I can remember. All departments have their own. HMRC is pretty clear but others use ‘ordinarily resident’ or ‘habitually resident’. I did phone the International Pension Centre early on to ask where I could find the rules. I was told they would be on the .gov.uk website. I said I’d looked and couldn’t find them and was told “They’ll be on there somewhere”. I mentioned this when I wrote to my MP and he couldn’t help either. On various calls when I’ve asked what would constitute becoming resident again, I’ve been told. “Being in the UK for 6 months”. I don’t know if that’s got to be continuous or not. “It’s not really just how long you’re here as it’s based on other things as well that help us decide if you’re resident or not”. On my last call when I pointed out that between early April 2024 and early March 2025 I would have been in the UK for 186 days, so more than 6 months, the woman said “Oh yes that would mean you are resident”. So I’m now resident, at least for now.

It’s not as simple as it sounds is it.

Oh yes! It´s still fairly simple. You did not know. You did not keep on until they gave you the regulations.

If you are a resident or not right now, depends on if you were in UK 6 month continuously or not. If not, you will not be a resident.

Also, you write something like a problem because your wife´s mother getting old???? Really??? Did you not know people are getting old, or did you think she was younger than she really is? That is just not a problem that just pop up out of the blue. Everyone know people are getting old and must plan for that.

So, everything is still same easy. Happy New Year!

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
On 12/16/2024 at 10:16 AM, rustyhinges said:

I live in Thailand and worked here previously for 7 years and have a Thai spouse.

I began to receive my UK state pension in May 2023. Last May 2024 I did not receive the UK indexed linked increase to my monthly pension.

I discussed this with a former colleague / friend who lives in the Philippines with his Filipino spouse.

He told me that he does receive the annual increases to his UK state pension but was aware that UK citizens living in some other countries are not entitled to the same annual uplift.

I visited the UK.GOV DWP website to investigate this apparent anomaly. I was very surprised indeed to learn that is true.

This seems so unfair without ant reasonable basis!!!

Surely entitlement should be based on citizenship and contributions paid over the years of the working life and not on address of residence.

I think this case of unfairness should be put before the International Court of Human Rights if the House of Lords do not correct this blatantly wrong policy.

Why some countries and not others?  Especially why the difference between the Philippines and Thailand?  What did the UK legal beagles list as the discriminating factors to allow one to give increases but not the other?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...