Baht Simpson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, G_Money said: You’re still weird. And the relevance of the two? What's also weird is that you feel I need to explain myself to you. I don't live by your command. This is going nowhere, so knock yourself out and have the last word. Edited 4 hours ago by Baht Simpson
Airalee Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 11 hours ago, Baht Simpson said: Your profile says joined 2022 and 8720 posts. This isn't heat it's kindergarten. 😀 Now do Jingthing 2
Baht Simpson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, owl sees all said: What is this pansexual? It's just a made up word. Bending down to catch the escaped critters. Nonsense. All words are made up, Owl. That's how they become words. Take it up with Dr. Johnson. 😀
Baht Simpson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Airalee said: Now do Jingthing I beg your pardon? Lol
G_Money Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said: What's also weird is that you feel I need to explain myself to you. I don't live by your command. This is going nowhere, so knock yourself out and have the last word. “And the relevance of the two?“ Can’t answer?
Baht Simpson Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, Luuk Chaai said: To save time .... Short version ...... 27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. Notice,, there's only "2" Notice,, there are 0 gods. 1 1
G_Money Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Baht Simpson said: Notice,, there are 0 gods. Are you saying you evolved from apes?
KhunLA Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, owl sees all said: You are a pioneer. I've just had a quick glance through the 72 genders, and I can't find a reference to ladies who like to smoke a pipe during sex. Perhaps my dyslexia kicked in and it's gender 96; not 69. I'll investigate further. I'm more confused than ever Nah ... you just got '69' on the brain ... ... and that's a good thing, no matter what one's preference is
Jingthing Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 39 minutes ago, KhunLA said: Nah ... you just got '69' on the brain ... ... and that's a good thing, no matter what one's preference is 69 is overrated. As are threesomes.
Baht Simpson Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, G_Money said: Are you saying you evolved from apes? You seem to be evolving to one. 😀
FruitPudding Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I am personally against gay marriage because if they can get married, they can then adopt children.
NoshowJones Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 11/15/2024 at 8:54 AM, JonnyF said: It's been popular with homosexuals for years. I often see elderly Americans walking around Silom with their little Thai twink it tow. I don't really see it as much of a benefit to tourism though, compared to all the Muslims/Arabs that object to such open displays of homosexuality. I never thought I would see the day when I had anything in common with Muslims.
G_Money Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 23 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said: You seem to be evolving to one. 😀 God created me. You on the other hand don’t believe in God so the only alternate would be from an ape. If it helps, you’re not alone. Most leftists are lost souls.
NoshowJones Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 11/15/2024 at 8:56 AM, quake said: I give it a go. Gays just want to get on with there life. Queers, just want you to look at them. I'm so important, look at me, you will look at me. and more aggressive stuff. Why not just use the proper word homosexual, or even just homo for short? 1
Ralf001 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, NoshowJones said: Why not just use the proper word homosexual, or even just homo for short? Faggot rolls off the tongue nicely ! 2
quake Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 11 minutes ago, NoshowJones said: Why not just use the proper word homosexual, or even just homo for short? I preferred bummers, but that's not so cool nowadays. Oh the times are a changing. Edited 2 hours ago by quake 1
NoshowJones Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago On 11/15/2024 at 10:26 AM, FolkGuitar said: May I ask a serious question? Why are you so wrapped up in judging the behavior of other people? One day I walked into a public toilet and noticed a guy standing at the entrance, I thought nothing of it and just walked to a urinal, the guy immediately appeared at a urinal next to me, there were no other guys at any other urinal. What sort of behaviour would you call that?
NoshowJones Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 11/15/2024 at 12:40 PM, Oink said: I thought P was for Poofters (same as Queer) Don't blame me, I am sure a Hetero did not come up with the acronym. Who came up with Gay? I always thought that Gay meant happy.
Jingthing Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, NoshowJones said: One day I walked into a public toilet and noticed a guy standing at the entrance, I thought nothing of it and just walked to a urinal, the guy immediately appeared at a urinal next to me, there were no other guys at any other urinal. What sort of behaviour would you call that? Sounds like rude behavior to me. Such things are more common with closeted men even more so in oppressive to gay people societies. But some might be flattered. I'm assuming nothing further happened or you would have told us, so ultimately harmless, yes?
dinsdale Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I have absolutely no problem with people being gay. What I have a problem with is pandering to a minority agenda. 1
Jingthing Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, Ralf001 said: Faggot rolls off the tongue nicely ! So that's OK to say on the forum now? Just checking. IF that's OK is the N word for blacks also OK? The K word for Jews? The G word for Asians? Just asking questions!
Jingthing Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, dinsdale said: I have absolutely no problem with people being gay. What I have a problem with is pandering to a minority agenda. You need to be more specific. Do you consider marriage equality pandering to a minority agenda?
Jingthing Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 32 minutes ago, FruitPudding said: I am personally against gay marriage because if they can get married, they can then adopt children. Not necessarily. It depends on the laws of the jurisdictions in question.
Ralf001 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Jingthing said: So that's OK to say on the forum now? Just checking. IF that's OK is the N word for blacks also OK? The K word for Jews? The G word for Asians? Just asking questions! must be, it aint censored. Whats the K word for jews ? 1
NoshowJones Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 23 hours ago, Jingthing said: Maybe they are a sovereign nation and have decided to expand the civil rights of their own citizens not caring that other nations are more backwards. I seriously doubt there is even one foreign tourist that wouldn't travel to Thailand because LGBTQ civil rights have been expanded here. On the other hand, backwards countries like Iran, Sudan, Jamaica, etc. lose many potentional tourists because of their oppressive laws. "backwards countries like Iran, Sudan, Jamaica". Taking homosexuality aside, is Thailand not also a backward country?
Jingthing Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Ralf001 said: must be, it aint censored. Whats the K word for jews ? Hopefully, an oversight.
dinsdale Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 14 minutes ago, Jingthing said: You need to be more specific. Do you consider marriage equality pandering to a minority agenda? That's not what I consider pandering. That should be a right and it's not so in so many places purely because of religious doctrine. Having pride week/month is. Having transsexual literature in primary schools is. Edited 1 hour ago by dinsdale
Jingthing Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, NoshowJones said: "backwards countries like Iran, Sudan, Jamaica". Taking homosexuality aside, is Thailand not also a backward country? Not relevant here. I was obviously referring to the topic here related to gay civil rights.
Ralf001 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 minute ago, Jingthing said: Hopefully, an oversight. you should report my post and have the word added to the censored list ! Edited 1 hour ago by Ralf001
Nick Carter icp Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 7 minutes ago, NoshowJones said: Who came up with Gay? I always thought that Gay meant happy. Gay did mean happy . Homosexuality was illegal in the UK , so instead of stating that people were homosexual , they used the term Gay . I suppose that homosexuals were more flamboyant than the typical serious males in the 1940s 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now