Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Britain may align with the European Union in any global trade dispute ignited by former U.S. President Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House, suggested Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds. Highlighting the UK's close trading ties with the EU, Reynolds underscored the need to balance relations with Brussels against pressures from Washington.  

 

Trump has reportedly considered imposing hefty tariffs of up to 60% on Chinese goods and up to 20% on imports from other nations, a move experts warn could spark a global trade war. European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has cautioned that such geopolitical shifts place the single market under significant strain.  

 

Speaking to the House of Lords International Agreements Committee, Reynolds addressed the implications for Britain: "Tariffs on UK goods entering the U.S. would be a difficult thing for us to contend with. The U.S. is a key trading partner with £300 billion in bilateral trade. But compared to the EU, with over £800 billion in trade, we would have to weigh the consequences of actions that risk our relationship with Europe."  

 

Reynolds also noted the UK’s heightened vulnerability in a trade confrontation with China due to its global trade dependencies. "If there were a broader trade conflict between China and the West, the UK, as a globally oriented trading nation, would face more pain than the U.S. Simply replicating policies proposed by other nations might be more damaging to us than many realize," he said.  

 

His remarks come as the Labour government seeks to recalibrate its diplomatic relationships, including with the U.S., where Reynolds's comments risk creating tensions. Conservative critics argue that prioritizing Brussels over Washington could squander a valuable opportunity for deeper trade ties with America.  

 

Maxwell Marlow of the Adam Smith Institute warned against aligning too closely with the EU, saying, "The EU is synonymous with heavy-handed regulation and red tape, while America champions innovation and dynamism. Embracing Europe’s degrowth agenda will make Britain poorer and alienate our American allies. Instead, the UK should pursue a full-fat free trade agreement with the U.S."  

 

Meanwhile, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the G20 summit in Brazil, marking the first high-level UK-China talks since 2018. President Xi appeared to endorse Labour's economic vision, saying, "The UK is working to fix its economic foundations and rebuild Britain."  

 

However, this meeting drew criticism from Conservative figures, including former Cabinet minister Sir Iain Duncan Smith, who accused Starmer of “kowtowing” to an authoritarian regime. "Those suffering under Xi’s genocidal policies and forced labor will feel betrayed," he said. Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge acknowledged the importance of dialogue but stressed the need to recognize China’s "huge threat" to democratic values.

 

As the geopolitical landscape becomes increasingly volatile, Britain’s position in navigating complex relationships with the U.S., EU, and China remains critical. The government's next steps will likely determine whether it can safeguard its economic and political interests without alienating key allies.

 

Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-20

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

Posted
4 hours ago, Social Media said:

Meanwhile, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the G20 summit in Brazil, marking the first high-level UK-China talks since 2018.

 

I'm sure they got on well. Many shared values such as communism, curtailing freedoms and liberty, limiting free speech etc.

 

2 peas in a pod.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

I'm sure they got on well. Many shared values such as communism, curtailing freedoms and liberty, limiting free speech etc.

 

2 peas in a pod.

Xi isn't a communist, he is a dictator representing capitalism without restraints which is how China became the worlds factory producing everything from Trump's bibles to advanced EV's, while Sir Keir Starmer is just an inept fool with a knighthood.

  • Agree 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, soalbundy said:

Xi isn't a communist, he is a dictator representing capitalism without restraints which is how China became the worlds factory producing everything from Trump's bibles to advanced EV's, while Sir Keir Starmer is just an inept fool with a knighthood.

 

Communist countries produce things. They just ensure the state controls the means of production. 

 

Communist countries also have dictators.

 

Agree on old 2 tier though. He is totally incompetent and will harm the uk immensely. In many ways deliberately.

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Communist countries produce things. They just ensure the state controls the means of production. 

 

Communist countries also have dictators.

 

Agree on old 2 tier though. He is totally incompetent and will harm the uk immensely. In many ways deliberately.

The word communism to describe certain countries always amuses me, there has never been a communist state, even the Soviet Union described itself as a Soviet Socialist Republic, it wasn't even socialist it was a dictatorship of oligarchs. Communism was a goal to achieve, first through socialism. There are Communist parties of course but they can only function as a party within the framework of the existing state. It's the same with Christianity, there is no such thing as a Christian country, only countries which have Christianity as its main religion but which behave in a secular, or as in the middle ages, dictatorial, repressive manner. One of the tenets of Communism is 'To each according to his needs, from each according to his abilities'. This sounds almost a Christian ideal, which is why, like Christianity, it can't function, mankind is too selfish and greedy. Jesus said, 'the poor will always be with us' and he was right, there will be the wealthy who control society and the mass who obey, no matter which form of government.

Posted

Don't panic.

 

The Tottenham Turnip will ensure peace and harmony between the US and UK

 

It is also interesting to note that the man tipped to be the next British Ambassador to the US, one Peter Mandleson, is recommending that Labour take up Nigel Farage's offer

 

Quote

Lord Peter Mandelson has urged Sir Keir Starmer to use Nigel Farage as a bridge between Donald Trump’s incoming administration and the UK.

The Labour peer, who is the favourite to be named as the next British ambassador to the UK, also warned that his party needs to end its feud with Trump ally and X (formerly Twitter) boss Elon Musk.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/peter-mandelson-keir-starmer-nigel-farage-trump-musk-b2649891.html

 

They would do well to remember that Musk probably has access to information that would crush most of the Labour Party 😀😀😀

Posted
29 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

It is also interesting to note that the man tipped to be the next British Ambassador to the US, one Peter Mandleson, is recommending that Labour take up Nigel Farage's offer

 

Starmer would never agree. He'd rather see the UK crash and burn than work with Farage. 

 

In fact he'd probably see further damage to the UK as a bonus of not working with our Nige.

 

Like most pearl clutching UK liberals they secretly hate the UK and it's working classes. 

  • Confused 1
Posted

If Americans voted for Trump to fill up their wallets, think again! Lol! You will be poorer than a state in the darkest Central Africa!  🤣

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...