Gop Speaker places a ban in the Capitol restrooms…

[riclag]

Symbolic recognition,of Traditions.
 

“Woman’s facilities in the capitol and house office buildings, such as restrooms, changing rooms,and locker rooms are reserved for individuals of that biological sex “.

 

"It is important to note that each Member office has its own private restroom, and unisex restrooms are available throughout the Capitol," he said. "Women deserve women's only spaces."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-speaker-bans-trans-women-from-using-capitol-womens-bathrooms-after-first-openly-trans-lawmaker-is-elected-180128453.html

[Jingthing]

So what about trans men?

No knee jerk phobic rule to harass them?

[EVENKEEL]

25 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

So what about trans men?

No knee jerk phobic rule to harass them?

Nobody is being harassed. Stop the drama 

[Cryingdick]

27 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

So what about trans men?

No knee jerk phobic rule to harass them?

 

They all moved to Minnesota because of tampon Tim's favorable bathroom policies. 

[Jingthing]

2 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Nobody is being harassed. Stop the drama 

Why make a new rule to shame one person? There wasn't a problem.

[riclag]

10 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Nobody is being harassed. Stop the drama 

Johnson mentions the numerous other

facilities available. 
Biological Woman & Girls  need safe spaces!

[Cryingdick]

2 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Why make a new rule to shame one person? There wasn't a problem.

 

Okay. So if there is a trans in some high school out there we don't make laws to guarantee access to the girls locker room? A law for only a tiny few? You just want it one way. We are just reasserting some sense of normalcy.

[pattayasan]

53 minutes ago, Cryingdick said:

Okay. So if there is a trans in some high school out there we don't make laws to guarantee access to the girls locker room? A law for only a tiny few? You just want it one way. We are just reasserting some sense of normalcy.

 

Careful what you're calling normal. Baseless, unrelenting vicious hatred of minorities isn't normal.

[Yagoda]

49 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Careful what you're calling normal. Baseless, unrelenting vicious hatred of minorities isn't normal.

Don't see much hatred, just see a desire not to have some mentally ill dude wave his pecker in the women's bathroom. Of course some folks are going to take the side of the mentally ill men due to the leftist desire to upend morality in there continual efforts to destroy the freedom of the western world, but we should protest against the left using the sick to fight their wars. Sort of like Hamas hiding behind women and children

[Cryingdick]

51 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Careful what you're calling normal. Baseless, unrelenting vicious hatred of minorities isn't normal.

I am gay. It is normal for people to use the appropriate restrooms for their biological sex. It isn't hatred. Many people are fed up with this baseless rabble rousing. The person in question can take a dump.

[Yagoda]

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Why make a new rule to shame one person? There wasn't a problem.

It's not shaming, it's objecting to the leftists spitting in the face of women. I don't think there's much issue over the fact that homosexuality and transgenderism is based on a misogynistic view of women

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, Cryingdick said:

I am gay. It is normal for people to use the appropriate restrooms for their biological sex. It isn't hatred. Many people are fed up with this baseless rabble rousing. The person in question can take a dump.

 

Being gay is a long way from needing a sex change. Keep praying.

[Hanaguma]

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Why make a new rule to shame one person? There wasn't a problem.

It IS a problem if a woman who has PTSD and is the survivor or rape says it is a problem. What happened to "believe all women"?

Plus laws are often spurred by a single event, but they do not target the particular person. They simply highlight the issue.  It ensures that other women won't have the same problem in the future. 

[Cryingdick]

29 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Being gay is a long way from needing a sex change. Keep praying.

You don't need a sex change it is about identifying. If you cut your pecker off okay I concede. If you are a bearded dude in a skirt, not so much. Laws only became necessary as common sense became uncommon. If you have a pecker don't do into a bathroom meant for more than one person. Otherwise all bathrooms are unisex.

[riclag]

7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

Okay. So if there is a trans in some high school out there we don't make laws to guarantee access to the girls locker room? A law for only a tiny few? You just want it one way. We are just reasserting some sense of normalcy.

Common sense

[Dcheech]

That can't be good for Lindsay Graham & staff.  

[Jingthing]

11 hours ago, riclag said:

Johnson mentions the numerous other

facilities available. 
Biological Woman & Girls  need safe spaces!

I don't know if that's really true. He's a notorious liar. For example if a trans tourist visits the house, are there really unisex facillities available to them? 

As far as making this house rule which is pure anti-trans showboating universal, that doesn't work because in most public places there are only sex segrated toilets. Do people really want a person who looks like a woman to use the mens and vice versa? REALLY? 

[jerrymahoney]

“I’m not here to fight about bathrooms. I’m here to fight for Delawareans and to bring down the costs facing families. Like all members, I will follow the rules outlined by Speaker Johnson, even if I disagree with them,” (Sarah) McBride said Wednesday in a statement posted to the social platform X.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5000611-sarah-mcbride-complies-bathroom-policy/