Jump to content

Rachel Reeves Under Fire: Career Claims Spark Controversy


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Rachel Reeves, Britain's current Chancellor of the Exchequer, finds herself at the center of a storm regarding her professional credentials. The controversy arises from claims that Reeves may have overstated her career in economics to bolster her political image, an issue that has garnered attention both online and in Parliament.

 

During her time as shadow Chancellor and in the lead-up to her election campaign, Reeves frequently highlighted her economic background. In interviews and speeches, she described herself as having spent her career as an economist at prestigious institutions like the Bank of England and Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS). “I started my career as an economist at the Bank of England and worked in financial services for many years,” she told Stylist magazine, presenting this experience as vital preparation for her role managing Britain’s economy.

 

Her official website once declared, “Rachel has spent her professional career as an economist,” and biographies for speaking engagements reiterated this narrative. However, recent updates to her online profile have cast doubt on these assertions. A discreet edit now states that Reeves worked in "retail banking" from 2006 to 2009, a far cry from the previously touted economist roles.

 

This revision followed viral social media posts, including one by Kevin Gillett, a former senior director at HBOS. Gillett claimed Reeves was a "complaints support manager" during her time at HBOS, not an economist as she had claimed. His post described her as holding a junior position, adding that she was "three levels below" him. He also alleged that Reeves faced disciplinary issues, including an expenses-related controversy and frequent absences attributed to non-work-related commitments. Gillett’s post alleged she ultimately resigned after being confronted with evidence.

 

Reeves’ team has strongly refuted these claims, particularly those about expense misuse and absences. A spokesperson declared, “We cannot stress how sharply we refute them.” They suggested the LinkedIn allegations were misleading, though they quietly updated her professional profile shortly after the posts gained traction.

 

The controversy reached Parliament, where Reeves faced criticism during Prime Minister's Questions. Tory MPs accused her of "misrepresenting" her credentials, with Reform Party MP Lee Anderson mockingly referring to her as "Rachel from Accounts" and suggesting her CV belonged "in the trash can."

 

While Reeves’ early career at the Bank of England remains undisputed, the details of her role at HBOS remain murky. Industry practices complicate matters, as personnel files from both institutions are routinely deleted after a decade, making it difficult to definitively prove or disprove the allegations.

 

For Reeves, who has cultivated an image as a disciplined economist prepared to handle the nation’s purse strings, the unfolding drama is a significant blow. Critics argue it undermines trust in her qualifications, while supporters maintain the changes to her CV were a clarification rather than an admission of exaggeration.

 

Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-25

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, steve187 said:

I think the PM and Reeves will resign.

The petition to 'call a general election' stands at 1,764,164, and going up at a fast rate, bearing in mind that it is early hours in the UK

Something strange going on with that petition, you posted that 4 hours ago, it is still only on 1,798,878, I am sure it was on 1.8 million before

 

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/700143

Posted
1 hour ago, James105 said:

 

In 2 years time when the UK has endured its 4th consecutive quarter of recession, the Starmer/Reeves clown show will still be repeating the same tedious and vacuous phrases of "22bn black hole", "fixing the foundations", "tough choices" and "cleaning up the mess left by previous government".  

 

Ahh ... predictions. Where's TransAm's crystal ball when you need it?

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, RayC said:

 

Ahh ... predictions. Where's TransAm's crystal ball when you need it?

 

Bookmark it if you like.   Rachel from the customer complaints team with her anti-growth policies will ensure it happens.   Economics 101 (obviously the class she skipped out on) is very clear that you cannot tax your way to growth.   My next prediction is that when growth does not happen, Labour will be back for more taxes, inhibiting growth even further. 

Posted
1 hour ago, James105 said:

will still be repeating the same tedious and vacuous phrases of "22bn black hole"

They could fill that alleged 22bn black hole with the 22bn earmarked for Millibrand to distribute to newly set up "consultancies" etc. it's just a matter of "tough choices", put up with the backlash of pulling back the promised pork from their own, or filling the alleged hole in public services budgets.

  • Like 1
Posted

I can quite believe the frequent absences were due to suffering from hangovers after a night on the piss.

 

Another lying politician, as the vast majority are...

 

The stuff and scandal coming out of the woodwork now is getting better than the corrupt Tories, polls at a all time low, inflation and economy trashed...

Posted
8 hours ago, steve187 said:

I think the PM and Reeves will resign.

The petition to 'call a general election' stands at 1,764,164, and going up at a fast rate, bearing in mind that it is early hours in the UK

 

 

They won't be beating the record set by Liz Truss with her very popular mini budget. 50 days to beat.

 

It is said if you pay peanuts you get monkeys,  We seem to be getting very well paid monkeys. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

You get what you vote for 

Looking at Labour Starmer Lammey Milliband Reeves could go on all 🤡

Interesting times coming up for the UK 

Glad I am here in Thailand 

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 hours ago, steve187 said:

I think the PM and Reeves will resign.

The petition to 'call a general election' stands at 1,764,164, and going up at a fast rate, bearing in mind that it is early hours in the UK

At most the petition will force a discussion in parliament.

Reeves was an economist. She was economical with the truth.😋

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Denim said:

We seem to be getting very well paid monkeys. 

We seem to be getting very well paid idiotic money grabbing, two faced, on the scrounge monkeys! 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, RayC said:

 

Ahh ... predictions. Where's TransAm's crystal ball when you need it?

He's probably busy making up his childish emojis, pathetic 🙄 

Posted
58 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

We seem to be getting very well paid idiotic money grabbing, two faced, on the scrounge monkeys! 

 

Come on. Don't hold back. Get it off your chest and say what you feel.

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, James105 said:

 

With 14 years to prepare for this as well it takes a special kind of stupid to perform as badly and be as incompetent as these clowns.  In 2 years time when the UK has endured its 4th consecutive quarter of recession, the Starmer/Reeves clown show will still be repeating the same tedious and vacuous phrases of "22bn black hole", "fixing the foundations", "tough choices" and "cleaning up the mess left by previous government".  

 

She and her boss are already getting ready for there next performance.

Just need the spinning bowtie and large shoes.

Caaaaapture.PNG

  • Like 1
Posted

Rachel from accounts should resign immediately.

 

How can anyone respect such a blatant liar who is also completely inept?

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
22 hours ago, Seppius said:

Something strange going on with that petition, you posted that 4 hours ago, it is still only on 1,798,878, I am sure it was on 1.8 million before

 

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/700143

3 hours ago it was over 2.3 million . Unfortunately this petition will not force a new election , at best a Commons debate . A mass demonstration may have more effect but Starmer has already bought the railway workers , who are unlikely to make a protest , which could have had a massive impact .  It's just the start of the UK winter and the first spell of bad weather . There will be no doubting of major issues for this manslaughter Labour government in the months to come . RR & KS are devils in disguise along with other cabinet members . How do you think the labour candidates will do in the new year by- elections ?

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...