Trump's Legal Battles and Their Unintended Legacy of Backfiring

[Keep Right]

Interesting but 76,000,000 people do not seem to care or think the legal battles are a farce. Time will tell of course but I think game is over for the allegations. 

[herfiehandbag]

On 11/28/2024 at 10:18 AM, illisdean said:

constitutionally  illegal gag orders,

The gag orders were imposed to stop Trump from threatening jurors, witnesses and the families of the Judge.

 

On 11/28/2024 at 10:18 AM, illisdean said:

VERY biased left leaning supporting Biden judges, Total hoax, bogus indictments, made up crimes, barred by statute of limitations, fed misdemeanor crimes morphed into state felonies

The judges have bent over backwards to accommodate Trump. The indictments were in many of the cases a result of Grand Jury deliberations; the crimes for which he was charged and convicted ( by a jury remember) were crimes which could have been charged as either misdemeanors or felonies, the decision was taken to charge them as felonies.

 

You look forward and state "Trump's Department of Justice", and his "FBI Director" will prosecute and jail those who gained what were entirely proper convictions against him. That in itself more than hints that such prosecutions will be politically driven and a form of revenge. Of course everyone knows that to be the case, he has trumpeted that loud and often, and it is obviously what is driving his attempts to install his cronies in those posts - but perhaps ponder, such political prosecutions, if forced through, will be the "coup de grace" for an already greviously wounded judicial system.

 

Do you, or perhaps more pertinently 50% of the country, want to believe, and approve of the use of the FBI and the DOJ to get such blatant political revenge convictions?

 

You may, but I think most of the American public won't.

Edited 11 hours ago by herfiehandbag

[riclag]

1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

A great comeback by any measure, and well deserved after all the disgraceful attempts to eliminate him.

We got him this time vs Trump lies 

must be tied by now!

[illisdean]

3 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

Do you, or perhaps more pertinently 50% of the country, want to believe, and approve of the use of the FBI and the DOJ to get such blatant political revenge convictions?

Its not revenge, its administering rule of law justice. If you understand specific and general deterrence principles relating to crime prevention you might have a clue. If the prosecutors, state & federal colluded with the Biden and/or his WH counsel, then heads will roll, as they should. 

 

3 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

The judges have bent over backwards to accommodate Trump.

The bent over backwards to strip away his constitutional rights, commited Brady violations, destroyed attorney-client privilege and ruled against him on every objection and motion, planted and tampered with evidence in the MAL doc case, and changed statute of limitations laws to prosecute a bogus sex assault case from 27 years ago. The judges were biased and all handpicked to stack the deck against Trump but they all screwed up and failed. They

 

3 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

Grand Jury deliberations;

miserably and instead of jailing him THEY GOT HIM ELECTED. LOL. Chew on that one a bit....taste good? Grand juries can indict a hand sandwich and consist ONLY of prosecution testimony with no defense challenges or rebuttal evidence. How about the jury verdict of a federal election misdemeanor morphed to a statute barred felony that no one knows what felony was committed?  Is that judges "bending over" or rather bending over the defendant?  You make no sense, are not able to articulate the circumstances and you got NOTHING. If you call rule of law justice as revenge then you need an exam of whats going on between your ears or maybe call your comrade at the politburo for guidance or maybe some more vodka. In closing, Bidens own DOJ made a prima facia case for Biden committing espionage by knowingly  possessing and sharing classified documents and actually selling them for his book deal but was deemed too mentally unfit to face indictment for crimes committed 20 years prior BUT he can remain in office as president despite his mental impairment. Think about that and thing double standard, two sets of rules, double standard BUT also factor in Trump had right to declassify ANY doc under the PRA whereas Biden did not. 

[illisdean]

4 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

what were entirely proper convictions against him

no they were not, read the case law, and try to define this mysterious "felony" no one can describe but one or 4 jurors may have issued a verdict on. I'll wait for this so called felony the jury ruled on. Don't forget the original statute barred misdemeanor campaign finance violations were not considered for prosecution by the DOJ, SDNY, and the election commission due to no indication of prosecutable violations but a "DOJ" prosecutor from bidens DOJ (M Collangelo) joined up in Manhattan prosectors office to morph a federal statute bared misdemeanor into an undefined state felony NOBODY wanted to prosecute 7 years prior even if they could have. LOL....give your head a shake.

Edited 7 hours ago by illisdean

[impulse]

On 11/28/2024 at 4:04 PM, candide said:

You mean like the GOP Senate Committee which ridiculously failed after two years of fishing?

 

Failed?  If you read their reports, they have enough evidence to put Biden away for decades.  They just can't indict a sitting president without first impeaching him, which is a political process.  It would never happen with a Dem majority in the Senate. 

 

Once Joe becomes a private citizen, they can go after him with no holds barred.