Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/28/2024 at 9:32 AM, GypsyT said:

The latest numbers show that in November, apprehensions hit a new low under Biden and sank lower than some months under Trump."

 

Border policy seems to be "Don't look, don't see." 

 

Apprehensions don't necessarily correlate to crossings, especially if 'crackdowns' in specific areas are publicized, giving illegals a heads up to illegally invade at less personed border areas.

Posted
1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

"A good start would be to reduce demand for illegal drugs "

 

The only way to do that is change the legal status of the drugs.

Otherwise it's like legislation to forbid rain on weekends and holidays, ain't gonna work.

And before anyone jumps to conclusions my only mood enhancing drug is caffeine; if it was made illegal

I would still try and get it.

I was specifically referring to opioids which killed over 80,000 people in the US last year. As I understand opioids primarily kill the less well off in the US. Whilst it seems helping out the less well off in the US goes against the grain the economic and societal damage of hard drug abuse must be significant. EU has less than 10% illegal drug deaths than the US., surely there are lessons to be learnt.

Posted
2 hours ago, transam said:

Noooo, western blokes who support a murdering dictator have that accolade.....:coffee1:..........😉

 

 

 

 

Proved my point, body of a 75 yr old, brain of a 12yr old

Posted
2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I suggest you look at what General Mark Milley said about it, before posting a lie.

 

Trump never got to fire him. Instead, he repeatedly denigrated Milley on Truth Social.

 

It's a familiar pattern, Trump appointing someone, only to claim the appointee was defective afterwards. Remarkable how poor a judge of character he repeatedly has been.

 

Just like your pattern of attacking posters who you disagree with, instead of addressing the facts.

So that's why Milley hates Trump and lies about him? He should have been court marshaled.

 

In any event, you claimed, "Trump wanted to attack Iran to bolster his electoral chances in 2019..." .

 

So why didn't he?

 

And do you have anything that supports your false claim?

Posted
52 minutes ago, simple1 said:

I was specifically referring to opioids which killed over 80,000 people in the US last year. As I understand opioids primarily kill the less well off in the US. Whilst it seems helping out the less well off in the US goes against the grain the economic and societal damage of hard drug abuse must be significant. EU has less than 10% illegal drug deaths than the US., surely there are lessons to be learnt.

Do you have anything that supports your claims?

Posted
1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

So that's why Milley hates Trump and lies about him? He should have been court marshaled.

 

In any event, you claimed, "Trump wanted to attack Iran to bolster his electoral chances in 2019..." .

 

So why didn't he?

 

And do you have anything that supports your false claim?

You seem to want it both ways - false claim, or why didn't Trump attack Iran? Maybe because he was not sure the order would be obeyed. He is a coward at heart, like all bullies.

 

The correct spelling is court martialed. Your ignorance of basic English is embarrassing.

  • Sad 1
Posted
9 hours ago, G_Money said:

 
So can the Cartels.

 

She is paid off quite well.

She is just a mouthpiece for the out going president, her mentor.  Now that the cartels can put the public elected judges in their pocket. Should be easy sailing for them.  The outgoing president was a real piece of work.

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, simple1 said:

I was specifically referring to opioids which killed over 80,000 people in the US last year. As I understand opioids primarily kill the less well off in the US. Whilst it seems helping out the less well off in the US goes against the grain the economic and societal damage of hard drug abuse must be significant. EU has less than 10% illegal drug deaths than the US., surely there are lessons to be learnt.

"A good start would be to reduce demand for illegal drugs "

 

No matter what drug is in question, how can demand be reduced?

Draconian penalties? That has been tried in the US and result has been a failure.

I am not trying to give you a hard time, but what ideas exist for reducing demand for drugs?

Anything new besides threat of punishment which doesn't seem to work?

Posted
1 minute ago, cdemundo said:

"A good start would be to reduce demand for illegal drugs "

 

No matter what drug is in question, how can demand be reduced?

Draconian penalties? That has been tried in the US and result has been a failure.

I am not trying to give you a hard time, but what ideas exist for reducing demand for drugs?

Anything new besides threat of punishment which doesn't seem to work?

 

Don't know, I'm not a drug addiction expert. Surely out of a population of 330 million plus, in addition to other countries input there is sufficient knowledge to commence targeted campaigns, plus addressing over subscription by the medical profession in the US. Many years ago I had an illegal drug addition, I didn't need countless counselling sessions, just woke up one day after an overdose and a nurse said to me do you want to die - so I never used again from my own will, no rehab etc etc. IMO opinion addiction is a state of mind and the only person who can stop the use is oneself - a lot of BS and hot air and god knows how much money is wasted

Posted
20 hours ago, transam said:

Where's all the Trump supporters on this one...........:clap2:

For what?

Enough brainless DemocRat supporters are here Transman!😁😁😁

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, transam said:

I never said it wasn't, I like coffee too, both are LEGAL..............🙄

So if coffee & alcohol were made illegal today, would you then look at them the same way as you do other 'brainwashing' drugs that numpties take?

  • Confused 1
Posted
13 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Proved my point, body of a 75 yr old, brain of a 12yr old

Is that from your Russian or farangy perspective...?....🤗

Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

So if coffee & alcohol were made illegal today, would you then look at them the same way as you do other 'brainwashing' drugs that numpties take?

They won't be, a lot of Churches would have to close their doors...........🤭

Posted
28 minutes ago, thaiger04 said:

For what?

Enough brainless Democrat supporters are here transam!😁😁😁

Dems that don't shy away from burying a Trump voter for posting nonsense, as you have also done.....😉

Posted
15 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Avoid the answer in true transman fashion

Because it was a very, very stupid question that deserved wit...........

I have told you before, to take more time thinking before you post.........🙄

Posted
36 minutes ago, transam said:

Because it was a very, very stupid question that deserved wit...........

I have told you before, to take more time thinking before you post.........🙄

Nah, it just hightlights fact you have no experience and your opinion has been made for you over years of media programming. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You seem to want it both ways - false claim, or why didn't Trump attack Iran? Maybe because he was not sure the order would be obeyed. He is a coward at heart, like all bullies.

 

The correct spelling is court martialed. Your ignorance of basic English is embarrassing.


While you’re criticizing other’s English try policing some of your own lefties to keep everything fair and balanced.

 

I recommend @Tug

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...