Women’s Privacy vs. Inclusion: One Woman’s Stand Against Gender-Neutral Toilets

[Social Media]

 

Sarah Holman’s journey from a dedicated council employee to a passionate advocate for women’s rights highlights the complex interplay of inclusion policies and personal safety concerns. The 56-year-old, a mother of two, had long enjoyed her role at Bracknell Forest Council in Berkshire, regenerating land for housing. Yet, her principles and past experiences drove her to make a difficult decision: resigning after 12 years of service due to the council’s shift to gender-neutral toilet policies.  

 

 

For Sarah, the policy change resurfaced a buried trauma. More than three decades earlier, while on holiday abroad, she had been sexually assaulted in a unisex restroom. “I’d walked into the cubicle, and a man followed me, blocking the doorway and gesturing that he wanted sex,” she recalls. “He lunged at me, putting his hands on me. I was too startled to fight back.” The assault ended only when another man passed by, but the memory lay dormant until the council’s decision triggered a visceral response.  

 

“I saw the sign on the door, and memories came flooding back,” Sarah shares. “I had an anxiety attack—palpitations, a racing heart. It was the first time I’d felt unsafe at work.”  

 

Her concerns deepened when the council adopted a “Trans and Non-Binary Policy” that effectively removed all single-sex toilets in the office. While Sarah supports equality, she believes the move neglected women’s rights. “All a male has to do is say, ‘I’m going through gender reassignment,’ and they can access women’s toilets. That’s really insulting to women.”  

 

Sarah’s personal experiences added weight to her objections. In 2000, she suffered a miscarriage at work. Reflecting on that harrowing ordeal, she says, “I was in a toilet cubicle, crying and in pain. I can’t imagine how much worse it would’ve been in a shared space with men. Women need privacy for moments like this.”  

 

Despite raising her concerns, Sarah found little support. “The council said sharing toilets with males was no different than sharing a lift. If staff objected, they’d be referred to counseling. It felt dismissive.” When the council formalized its policies in mid-2023, Sarah felt compelled to resign.  

 

The council’s use of the Progress Pride flag also troubled Sarah. She saw its prominence—as screensavers, meeting backdrops, and outside the building—as disproportionate. “It felt like virtue signaling, prioritizing trans rights over women’s,” she explains. Her suggestion to include other flags, like one for menopause awareness, was met with indifference.  

 

Sarah’s departure has not been the end of her fight. She is taking the council to an employment tribunal, alleging discrimination for her gender-critical views. “Councils across the country are gaslighting women, brushing aside our concerns in favor of ideological policies. This has to stop.”  

 

Bracknell Forest Council defends its stance, with Chief Executive Susan Halliwell stating that the policies aim to promote equality and diversity. The council maintains that it offers both single-sex and gender-neutral facilities. Yet for Sarah, this is inadequate. “In their efforts to be inclusive, they’re excluding women. Women’s dignity, privacy, and safety are being compromised.”  

 

Her decision to step away from a job she loved was not easy, but Sarah stands firm in her belief that women’s voices deserve to be heard. “I’m not a radical feminist, just an ordinary woman standing up for what’s right.”  

 

Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-30

 

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

Good for her. The creeping takeover of public institutions by the loonies will not stop till the public become aware of what is happening.

[Yagoda]

Homosexuality and transgenderism are mental illnesses and we should pity and help the sufferers. Helping them does not mean indulging them with the fantasies that control their lives, but rather, respectfully trying to steer them to reality.

[soalbundy]

A case for DEI, can't get more inclusive than encouraging sexual molestation from the mentally disadvantaged. Maybe her boss drives a Faguar.

[MalcolmB]

I wouldn’t want to share a toilet with her. 

[LukKrueng]

38 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

I wouldn’t want to share a toilet with her. 

It's obvious she doesn't want to share toilets with you either.

[Peabody]

11 hours ago, Social Media said:

The council maintains that it offers both single-sex and gender-neutral facilities. Yet for Sarah, this is inadequate.

What a friggin' whiner.

[black tabby12345]

Gender Neutral Toilet.

It only benefits Perverts.

[spidermike007]

Ladyboys should use men's toilets. Period. And they should use men's locker rooms, if on a sports team. Don't let the 00.2% dictate policy. Just say no. 

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Ladyboys should use men's toilets. Period. And they should use men's locker rooms, if on a sports team. Don't let the 00.2% dictate policy. Just say no. 

On that I disagree. I don't want to share a public toilet with a pickpocketer, and they may go in a gang to demand money with menaces.

 

The answer is actually simple, have separate toilets for those who don't know what their gender is.

[MalcolmB]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Ladyboys should use men's toilets. Period. And they should use men's locker rooms, if on a sports team. Don't let the 00.2% dictate policy. Just say no. 

Well Mike you might like sharing with these perverts but I think we should be doing everything we possibly can to keep them out of our men’s toilets. 
I don’t know if you get out much but these ladyboys often get very touchy-feely with me. 
 

Women are always claiming equality, so let them deal with it.

[Albo]

This doesn't matter. It's done and over. Moreover, *gender affirming care* is about to legally go down in flames as well.

 

DEI and activist gay politics is finished in US.

[Albo]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Ladyboys should use men's toilets. Period. And they should use men's locker rooms, if on a sports team. Don't let the 00.2% dictate policy. Just say no. 

 

That's not how it works in Thailand but you wouldn't know that because you don't live here.

[impulse]

If they have Men's rooms, Women's rooms and Wheelchair Accessible rooms with one seat that they designate as "gender neutral", I don't see a problem.  I can't see justifying the expense of having 2 separate single seaters.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by impulse

[thaibeachlovers]

49 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

On that I disagree. I don't want to share a public toilet with a pickpocketer, and they may go in a gang to demand money with menaces.

 

The answer is actually simple, have separate toilets for those who don't know what their gender is.

They could call the rooms Men, Women and Confused.

[proton]

 

14 hours ago, black tabby12345 said:

Gender Neutral Toilet.

It only benefits Perverts.

 

You would have grown men in there with little girls, so yes it would

[black tabby12345]

2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Ladyboys should use men's toilets.

 

More than a decade ago, I have seen such a scene in Thai Karaoke video.

Those 'women' dancing behind the female singer, all rushed to Men's Room when they were given a break during the take.