Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 4:12 PM, CanadaSam said:

I think it's kind of disrespectful to our maker, who made the female body absolutely beautiful, and in my mind, kindof perfect!

 

Trying to change it's Godly beauty by man-made ink, is like trying to paint over the Mona Lisa, with water colours, by a retarded child.

Some try to, usually unsuccessfully, cover up their stretchmarks with tattoos. 

When a dancer has tattoos solely on her belly, you can bet she has offsprings that left off putting marks. 

Tattoos are inversely correlated with attractiveness. 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted

It is literally a tribal marking. They have accepted that they have joined this specific subculture and it is their tribe. Specific kinds of tattoos help identify members of the tribe. 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted

There's a youtuve vid out there why nasty chix get tats..

 

It's basically a billboard for fact they like it fast and wildside..."easy access enquire within".

Posted

Dont you asshats ever get tired of disparaging women with tattoos? 

like them or don't, they are commonplace with women of all most cultures (yes i realize there are exceptions). You should pretty much be used to them by now. 

I am one of the very few people I know who doesn't have a tattoo. Certainly most folks under 50 I know, male or female have at least one.

 

get over it.  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, henryford1958 said:

 

Yes i think tattoos serve a very useful social function. It clearly identifies the sort of person that you should avoid, unless of course you are looking for a hooker.

Should non-tattooed bargirls avoid customers with tattoos?

Posted

I started getting them in 1974, not sure what the controIMG_20201201_093553968.thumb.jpg.a7c4a0a7ef026793ac317018ac5482be.jpgversy is all about. Had the dragon re inked last year because it had faded so much.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just met her last night after being introduced by the owner of a very fine establishment. She's the bees knees. I think she could be the one. Her name is Angel. Mom's gonna love her!
 

DDAA061A-378F-4665-BC83-21C4B370D776.png.db7d85eb3f2342a5fdd91d7d23996513.png

  • Haha 1
Posted

Any reason to show off. My former next door neighbor used to set the alarm on his new BMW so people would come and stare.

                                                                              " WHAT ABOUT ME"

  • Agree 1
Posted

Has nothing to do with P4P girls but has everything to do with the remaining few that are still obedient and living the traditional thai scheme game rather than having become more free etc.

 

Go to any university and at least 50% will have a tattoo. Even many 'traditional' girls will have a small one that can be hidden with clothes.

 

But hey, ignorance is a bliss.

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 11:52 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

Personally, I prefer the beginners without tattoos. But obviously there are not many of them. 

 

20 odd years ago not so many of them had tattoos. They were still taboo for Thais even among bar-girls and go-go dancers. 
 

There were a few that had sak yant, small designs, baby coverups and a few even had tats on their naughty bits. 

 

How times have changed.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

 

20 odd years ago not so many of them had tattoos. They were still taboo for Thais even among bar-girls and go-go dancers. 
 

There were a few that had sak yant, small designs, baby coverups and a few even had tats on their naughty bits. 

 

How times have changed.


30+ years ago, not nearly as many tattoos, but there were lots of labia piercings using bits of shiny stainless steel. I was always worried I was gonna crack a tooth on one of them. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Hmm have you noticed that half the world have tats?

 

I sometimes feel I'm the only man on the planet without ink.

 

When I was a kid tats were the realm of drunken sailors and women of ill repute.

 

Today everyone gets them.

 

I begged my kids, pierce what you want but don't ink it.

 

Of course all three of them totally ignored me.

 

So definitely sure tats aren't nowadays restricted to ladies of the night, and most certainly not mental illness, although maybe I'd go with social pressure or todays norms.

  • Agree 1
Posted
10 hours ago, henryford1958 said:

 

Yes i think tattoos serve a very useful social function. It clearly identifies the sort of person that you should avoid.

Yes. So many lucky tattooed folks that don't need to tell you to bugger off

Posted

Most of the mongers that spend time with these girls are tatted up low lives and these girls are tying to emulate their benefactors. The mongers enjoy scarifying their skin to hide blemishes and sagging skin and many of these girls have the same problem.

  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

We humans function by social imitation. If you grow up in an environment where everybody has tattoos and having a tattoo is perceived to be 'cool', chances are you're gonna get a tattoo later too. Especially if you grow up in a society like Thailand, which has a pretty big tattoo scene. 

Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 4:35 PM, GinBoy2 said:

Hmm have you noticed that half the world have tats?

 

I sometimes feel I'm the only man on the planet without ink.

 

When I was a kid tats were the realm of drunken sailors and women of ill repute.

 

Today everyone gets them.

 

I begged my kids, pierce what you want but don't ink it.

 

Of course all three of them totally ignored me.

 

So definitely sure tats aren't nowadays restricted to ladies of the night, and most certainly not mental illness, although maybe I'd go with social pressure or todays norms.

The same with all my kids besides the 8 year old. They all have at least one,all are above average in IQ, and most have more, and my dad had one from the military, and his IQ was well into genius level, so that theory doesn't fly.Like most everything else that's accepted in the world today, people who get them think it's okay because so many others do.

Posted
On 12/4/2024 at 2:51 AM, rucus7 said:

I started getting them in 1974, not sure what the controIMG_20201201_093553968.thumb.jpg.a7c4a0a7ef026793ac317018ac5482be.jpgversy is all about. Had the dragon re inked last year because it had faded so much.

 

Looks cool.

Posted
On 12/2/2024 at 11:14 AM, BritManToo said:

I always thought it was an expression of self hatred, they quite often cut themselves as well.

I always thought it was peer pressure brought on by the older more seasoned whores convincing the newer ones how good they looked and how many customers they have because of their tats. Most women in the southern region do not get tats. It is a sign of a bad girl. Except for the occasional buddhist tats. 

Posted
2 hours ago, The Old Bull said:

What a pile of negative comments, personally I like a little ink. Best when it only shows if they undress.

I wasn't trying to be negative, but more practical.

 

I tried to tell my kids, unsuccessfully as it turned out, was something that can look great on 20 year old skin, may not be quite so great on a 50/60/70 year old body. Aging has a cruel way of tat's looking ridiculous

 

Piercing, well get fed up with it, take out the hardware and soon enough you're back to normal.

 

Tat's remember you live with them forever

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...